<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[XCP-NG 9.0 Support for GRAID Tech GPU-accelerated RAID cards.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I have started a conversation with them about getting support for XCP-NG, for the VROC and the Supreme RAID solutions. I am looking at this as a forward looking effort. In these efforts I have found that Alma 10 is roughly what 9.0 is based upon.  What do I need to get pulled together to make this happen.  I actually am having a call with there DEV team today. To pull what is on there end that needs rot make it work.  I will update this with what happens on the call today.  I use there GPU-cards in 4 nodes that an are separate, each is part of GPU cluster.  I have wanted to build out the next customers clusters with XCP-NG with the accelerators in them.</p>
<p dir="auto">Mike George<br />
Bitrefinery</p>
]]></description><link>https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/12436/xcp-ng-9.0-support-for-graid-tech-gpu-accelerated-raid-cards.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 17:43:46 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/12436.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 15:39:40 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to XCP-NG 9.0 Support for GRAID Tech GPU-accelerated RAID cards. on Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:44:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks for chasing this with them, and for offering to post back after the call. <img src="https://xcp-ng.org/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f64f.png?v=f084dd9e819" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--pray" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":pray:" alt="🙏" /></p>
<p dir="auto">Your Alma 10 read looks right (the 9.0 demonstrator is Xen 4.19 with a dom0 loosely based on AlmaLinux 10 and a 6.12 kernel), but <a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/forum/user/yann" aria-label="Profile: yann">@<bdi>yann</bdi></a> said in July they're out of prototyping and rebuilding the foundations component by component, so I wouldn't treat that kernel as the one their driver ends up targeting. <img src="https://xcp-ng.org/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f937.png?v=f084dd9e819" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--shrug" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":shrug:" alt="🤷" /><br />
On the packaging side, the kernel module policy page is the nearest thing I've found to an answer for what you'd need to pull together: <a href="https://docs.xcp-ng.org/project/development-process/kernel-module-policy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">https://docs.xcp-ng.org/project/development-process/kernel-module-policy</a></p>
<p dir="auto">For VROC, my understanding is that it sits on VMD, though I could have that backwards. VMD stalled boot on the demonstrator kernel back in January until yann said he'd include a patch for it, so that stretch of the thread is worth a read before your call: <a href="https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/11698">https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/11698</a></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't know enough about driver packaging to say what Vates would actually need from GRAID, so it might be worth pulling in <a class="plugin-mentions-group plugin-mentions-a" href="/forum/groups/team-hypervisor-kernel" aria-label="Profile: Team-Hypervisor-Kernel">@<bdi>Team-Hypervisor-Kernel</bdi></a>, since drivers are their scope.<br />
If the call gives you a list of what they need from our side, that's probably the most useful thing to bring back here.</p>
]]></description><link>https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/108113</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/108113</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[poddingue]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:44:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>