XCP-ng

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    XenServer 8.0 - Major update due Q1 2019

    Development
    18
    89
    18361
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • _danielgurgel
      _danielgurgel last edited by

      When I adjust the FIXED memory to 100GB, and the minimum dynamic to 40GB and maximum dynamic to 60GB.

      But when I click Ok, the static memory gets the same value as the maximum dynamic.
      At least in XenServer 7.1 CU2, the configuration you report does not work for me.

      step1.jpg
      step2.jpg

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambert
        olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Founder & CEO 🦸 last edited by olivierlambert

        Please try with Xen Orchestra. You should be able to have this setting done once for all when the VM is halted, and then enjoy to set within the whole dynamic setting while it's up.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • _danielgurgel
          _danielgurgel last edited by

          @olivierlambert said in XenServer 8.0 - Major update due Q1 2019:

          Please try with Xen Orchestra. You should be able to have this setting done once for all when the VM is halted, and then enjoy to set within the whole dynamic setting while it's up.

          I LOVE XOA! hehehehe
          That'S exactly what I wanted.
          Thanks so Much for the help and sorry for the persistence.

          lovexoa.jpg
          xoamem.jpg
          xsmen.jpg

          But See the problem, VM Guest recognizes total memory.
          Is That a bug?

          memoria.jpg

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierlambert
            olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Founder & CEO 🦸 last edited by

            I need to run some tests on XCP-ng, but IMHO you shouldn't be able to see the static max inside the VM. You should be able to see dynamic max.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambert
              olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Founder & CEO 🦸 last edited by

              It's as expected in XCP-ng:

              Capture d’écran de 2019-04-01 20-03-32.png Capture d’écran de 2019-04-01 20-03-40.png

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • _danielgurgel
                _danielgurgel last edited by

                I tested on other VMs and the memory displayed is always the maximum static.
                Will a Bug on XS 7.1?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierlambert
                  olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Founder & CEO 🦸 last edited by

                  Possible, dynamic memory management changed a lot since 7.1

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stormi
                    stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team πŸš€ last edited by

                    If I remember correctly what I read, I think Windows guests see all the memory (static max or dynamic max, I don't remember) but there's a special device that "eats" the memory that is not available to the VM, so that what's really available to it corresponds to the dynamic value (between dynamic min and dynamic max).

                    C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambert
                      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Founder & CEO 🦸 last edited by

                      It's dynamic max. But I'm pretty sure it was heavily changed in 7.2

                      _danielgurgel 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        cg @stormi last edited by

                        @stormi It has always been the way that the daemon of xentools bloated up, when you need to free up dynamic memory within the range. I just have 7.1 LTSR running, can't verify for any CR, right now.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • _danielgurgel
                          _danielgurgel @olivierlambert last edited by

                          @olivierlambert I Did a test with the XS 7.6 and CentOS7 (HVM) and the memory calculation does not work correctly.

                          Sometimes it decreases the memory in the Guest VM, but never displays the values correctly. I am reinstalling the Host for XCP 7.6 and perform new tests. I'll open a new thread for that matter.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierlambert
                            olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Founder & CEO 🦸 last edited by

                            Behavior should be the same in XS and XCP-ng 7.6

                            If you have lower than dyn max in your VM, it's due to pressure of other VMs on the host. Also during a live migration, Xen will "deflate" the VM to dynamic min to allow faster migration.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • C
                              cg last edited by

                              Did anyone notice, that Citrix not only sucks with improvments for (non VDI) server admins, but also doesn't keep their promised releasedates? πŸ˜‰
                              Q1 is gone for some days and still no updates...
                              In fall our support contract ends, I'm following xcp-ngs roadmap and changes quite intense...

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • stormi
                                stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team πŸš€ last edited by

                                Well, in software development I prefer slipping release dates over broken software, so I won't throw the stone here πŸ™‚

                                C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • C
                                  cg @stormi last edited by

                                  @stormi said in XenServer 8.0 - Major update due Q1 2019:

                                  Well, in software development I prefer slipping release dates over broken software, so I won't throw the stone here πŸ™‚

                                  I could say: They had 3 months to geht their job done. πŸ˜‰

                                  stormi 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stormi
                                    stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team πŸš€ @cg last edited by

                                    @cg 3 months is short.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • C
                                      cg last edited by

                                      Just came in:

                                      alt text
                                      https://twitter.com/ismonkeyuser/status/1113783781238898688

                                      ;D

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • _danielgurgel
                                        _danielgurgel last edited by

                                        And we continue without any news ...

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • olivierlambert
                                          olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Founder & CEO 🦸 last edited by olivierlambert

                                          Yep, it seems they have some troubles internally to make it real. Hopefully, we'll have something soon. And yes, we agree that their (lack of) communication is disastrous.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • nikade
                                            nikade last edited by

                                            This is typical Citrix... XS isn't really a priority over there and havent been for many years.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post