Hi @tony yes I understand that, actually I made a post a while back spanning different aspects of the XOA and where I feel Center is more intuitive but as suggestion for XOA improvement if anyone cares to consider it.

Regarding the adding of SR's to pools, I leave my suggestion here, have a selector for pool instead of host, it'd be more intuitive imho. Cheers all.

Hi @tony yes I understand that, actually I made a post a while back spanning different aspects of the XOA and where I feel Center is more intuitive but as suggestion for XOA improvement if anyone cares to consider it.

Regarding the adding of SR's to pools, I leave my suggestion here, have a selector for pool instead of host, it'd be more intuitive imho. Cheers all.

@Danp ok thanks for the clarification. I didn't get that, thought it would be to add any SR. (using the remotes)

@tony what puzzles me about New > Storage is that I have to select a "host" which is different from Center, I only need to select the kind of storage (NFS, NFS ISO, iSCSI etc) and put the path to it, I'm not required to select a host. This sometimes messes with my head as I'm doing a change that affects the pool not hosts individually so this confuses me a bit. But all good, thanks for the answers.

Hi all,

So as some may recall I'm more used to XCP-ng Center and I've been trying to make the move to XOA and use it as default...

In the meanwhile as I deployed a new storage setup for the cluster (NFS) and at the time I was at the Center when I added the NFS Storage. All is working marvellously.
But when I go to XOA I know the NFS storage should be added through Settings > Remotes, but when I open it its empty and doesn't show any server there.
If I select Home > Storages the storage is there, no problems so far, migrating disks was a breeze.

So not having the NFS in the Remotes is thes expected behaviour, like when you add a server to a pool and the server disappears from the list? Thanks.

thank you @olivierlambert !

Hi all,

After some talks in IRC I promised that I'd come by the forum and give feedback regarding Xen Orchestra.
I usually prefer XCP-ng Center for the following reasons:

• The left hand menu where I can have an immediate overview at all times to all the hypervisors and VM's on the pool;
• The ability to select "Console" view when selecting an hypervisor or VM and after navigating away from that machine, coming back it will remember the view I had selected. For example if I select console on three different VM's and then cycle through them on Center I'll always be in the Console view. It's turning 1 click into several on XO: selecting the VM's, then opening the VM, then navigating to the view I want, every time;

Also I observe differences from XO and XCP-ng Center networking and an issue regarding adding networks that are specifically associated with a host.

Allow me to elaborate:

I have two /29 public subnets. One is routed to server1 and the other is routed to server2.
On XO if you go to:

• Pool > Network
  OR
• Hosts > hypervisor

Then select the network view you cannot select the PIF of the second hypervisor on the pool. It only displays the PIF of the first server in the pool. So if I want to configure the second /29 subnet I have to use Center, so it gets connected to the physical interface on server2.

The things mentioned here so far are what keeps me using Center instead of XO. If I find more I'll come back to this topic, I'm trying to use one and another and share the user experience.

e porque é que tem http e https na mesma porta?
pode funcionar, mas está errado. não é essa a abordagem correcta.