@acebmxer Hello, could you look into the xen and kernel logs for errors?
Team - Hypervisor Kernel
Posts
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
-
Enabling Intel APICv for better performance
Consider this feature as experimental 
Many Intel CPUs have support for Intel APICv (APIC Virtualization) features that aims at reducing the number of APIC-related VM-Exits in guests, hence improving performance.
This has been introduced circa Intel Ivy Bridge-EP, and is also available on somewhat recent client CPUs as well. But keep in mind that not all SKUs have support for it.Xen has support for it since roughly Xen 4.3, yet XenServer (and XCP-ng) originally disabled by default due to issues at this time around live migration between hardware that supports it and ones that don't.
Internal testing on the feature shows performance improvements in various benchmarks (5-10% in I/O benchmarks up to 30% on nginx with a Ice Lake Xeon). We didn't test on other CPUs, but older CPUs (in particular those affected by L1TF/Foreshadow) may observe larger improvements.
How to enable
This feature exists in the Xen version shipped in XCP-ng, but disabled by default, you can enable support on the host with
/opt/xensource/libexec/xen-cmdline --set-xen apicv=1 # then rebootOnce enabled, you can check hardware support with
xl dmesg | grep -A 25 "VMX: Supported advanced features"And look for
APIC Register VirtualizationandVirtual Interrupt Delivery.The feature can be disabled with
/opt/xensource/libexec/xen-cmdline --delete-xen apicv # then rebootWhat to test
Along with general feedback on the feature (does it work, supported hardware, ...), we're interested on :
- interactions with live migration, especially with hosts that have different configuration of APICv
- performance on various workloads (web server, databases, I/O, ...)
What about AMD ?
AMD counterpart is AVIC (Advanced Virtualized Interrupt Controller) introduced (in practice) with Zen 2 (but also existed on some Carrizo CPUs) then improved with x2AVIC with Zen 4.
Xen support for (x2)AVIC is currently work in progress.
Refer to Denis Mukhin's presentation on AVIC for Xen (Xen Summit 2026) : https://youtu.be/RhaJsOU_PIA -
RE: Support for newer Emulex LPe37xxx amd LPe36xxx Fiber channel adapters on XCP-ng 8.3 - your testing is needed
@jr-m4 thank you so much for testing this updated driver.
Just to make sure, I understand now that you confirm the driver is working as expected and the issues you had were not related to it? Or are there any problems still with this new driver?
Many thanks again for spending the time to test and report.
-
RE: 9.2.385 snapshot/backup corruption fix: which versions were affected, and does it apply to XenServer VM Tools?
@cg @trelane I've updated the release notes and added a link to the 9.2.351 patch.
For the IP loss bug when toggling the "Manage Citrix PV..." setting, this bug should not happen on XCP-ng tools. In theory, it should not happen on the XenServer 9.6.0 drivers either, but I haven't tested.
If you need to reconfigure your VM's IP, check out the commands
xe vif-configure-ipv4/ipv6. Currently it supports configuring IP/prefix/gateway; DNS configuration is coming soon. -
RE: PCIe Pass-through lanes and lane performance
I finally got access to a machine with Intel Arc machine.
There are issues around hvm-pirq, hence hvm-pirq=0 is required (see https://docs.xcp-ng.org/troubleshooting/common-problems/#pci-passthrough-error-unsupported-msi-delivery-mode-7).
For some reason, Fedora Workstation has a issue with this GPU (a Fedora bug I guess), but CachyOS (desktop iso) works fine.
Ran a clpeak bench, and performance looks normal for this class of GPU.
Host-device transfer is a bit slower than "theorical", but definetely not PCIe 1x1 and more PCIe 3x8-ish (matching reality as it's plugged as PCIe 3.0).in-VM
inxi -CGMMachine: Type: Xen System: Xen product: HVM domU v: 4.17 serial: 2c66cb09-57db-340c-ad8e-f505eb25ca3e Mobo: N/A model: N/A serial: N/A Firmware: UEFI vendor: Xen v: 4.17 date: 10/06/2026 CPU: Info: 6x 1-core model: Intel Xeon Silver 4112 bits: 64 type: SMP cache: L2: 6x 1024 KiB (6 MiB) Speed (MHz): avg: 2594 min/max: N/A cores: 1: 2594 2: 2594 3: 2594 4: 2594 5: 2594 6: 2594 Graphics: Device-1: driver: bochs-drm v: N/A Device-2: Intel Battlemage G21 [Arc Pro B50] driver: xe v: kernel Display: unspecified server: Xwayland v: 24.1.13 driver: gpu: bochs-drm tty: 212x48 API: EGL v: 1.5 drivers: iris,swrast platforms: gbm,surfaceless,device API: OpenGL v: 4.6 vendor: mesa v: 26.1.6-arch3.1 note: console (EGL sourced) renderer: Mesa Intel Arc Pro B50 Graphics (BMG G21), llvmpipe (LLVM 22.1.8 256 bits) API: Vulkan v: 1.4.357 drivers: intel surfaces: N/A Info: Tools: api: clinfo, eglinfo, glxinfo, vulkaninfo de: kscreen-console,kscreen-doctor gpu: gputop, intel_gpu_top, lsgpu, nvidia-smi wl: wayland-info x11: xdpyinfo, xprop, xrandrRaw numbers
Backend: Vulkan Device 0: Intel(R) Arc(tm) Pro B50 Graphics (BMG G21) Driver version : 26.2.4 API version : 1.4.354 VRAM : 16048 MB Single-precision compute float : 9.47 TFLOPS float2 : 9.48 TFLOPS float4 : 9.52 TFLOPS Half-precision compute fp16xfp16+fp16 half : 18.3 TFLOPS half2 : 18.8 TFLOPS half4 : 19.1 TFLOPS Double-precision compute double : 650 GFLOPS double2 : 647 GFLOPS double4 : 640 GFLOPS Mixed-precision compute fp16xfp16+fp32 mp : 9.31 TFLOPS mp2 : 9.32 TFLOPS mp4 : 9.42 TFLOPS BF16 compute bf16xbf16+fp32 bf16 : 9.17 TFLOPS bf16_2 : 9.30 TFLOPS bf16_4 : 9.28 TFLOPS Integer compute int32 int : 1.81 TOPS int2 : 1.88 TOPS int4 : 1.82 TOPS INT8 dot-product compute int8_dp : 28.0 TOPS int8_dp2 : 26.3 TOPS int8_dp4 : 27.1 TOPS Cooperative matrix fp16 : 67.3 TFLOPS fp16 f16acc : 68.9 TFLOPS bf16 : 68.9 TFLOPS int8 : 141 TOPS Global memory bandwidth float : 196 GB/s float2 : 206 GB/s float4 : 212 GB/s Local memory bandwidth float : 2.55 TB/s float2 : 3.65 TB/s float4 : 4.23 TB/s Image memory bandwidth float4 : 213 GB/s Transfer bandwidth h2d : 4.81 GB/s d2h : 5.48 GB/s Kernel launch latency dispatch : 48.7 us roundtrip : 113 usReal performance is much higher than the "displayed"
Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1. -
RE: Win Server 2012 R2 VM: repeated BSOD 0xD1 in xenvbd.sys (Citrix 8.1.0.130) - where to get VM Tools 9.2.3?
@john.c Indeed I skipped over the part that the host is still on 7.6, that's a rather big upgrade blocker I think.
Member List
|
74
Posts
38
Reputation
|
|
2
Posts
1
Reputation
|
|
20
Posts
16
Reputation
|
|
178
Posts
51
Reputation
|