Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    145 Topics
    5k Posts
    D
    @yomeyo It's a client shutdown being misreported as a client error. I'll fix this in the next release. The warning on upgrade should be harmless and you can simply close the application/click OK as you've done.
  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    15k Posts
    poddingueP
    I put both of your questions on a spare host, because I couldn't answer either from memory. On colons: xe creates a key literally called auto_poweron:true with an empty value, so the entries you saw were three separate keys and none was the real auto_poweron, and typing false afterwards just made another one. It exits 0 and prints nothing every time, which I'd call a rough edge rather than a feature, though other-config is free-form by design so I don't know that the CLI is meant to validate keys at all. On the sleep: with rc.local executable and no sleep, it fired at 16 seconds of uptime and xe appliance-start came back with Error: Connection refused (calling connect ), exit 1, in under a tenth of a second. The VM stayed halted and nothing was reported anywhere, since rc.local has no terminal to print to. rc-local.service only orders after basic.target and network.target, nothing toolstack-related, while xapi-wait-init-complete.service took 30 seconds on that host, which is presumably why 60 was barely enough for you. There's an xapi-init-complete.target that looks like the right thing to order a unit against instead of guessing at a delay, though I haven't tried it so treat that as a lead rather than advice. The executable-bit half is in the docs now, it went onto the troubleshooting page after you reported it: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/troubleshooting/common-problems
  • 3k Topics
    29k Posts
    poddingueP
    That question has come round three times on this thread since 2020, so it isn't a one-off. I'd rather not promise documentation I can't deliver, but I can take it to the people who decide and come back here either way, including if the answer is that proxy deployment stays an XOA thing. On the licensing side I'd sooner not encourage patching those checks out, mostly because I don't know what they're guarding. In the meantime, the two community scripts in this thread are what people are actually running, which is worth saying plainly even though it isn't the documented path you asked for.
  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    50 Topics
    796 Posts
    olivierlambertO
    Great, thanks for the feedback!
  • 37 Topics
    134 Posts
    AtaxyaNetworkA
    Déja une piste intéressante, on dirait que pour une raison quelconque l'iso est mount deux fois [image: 1786437651889-14d66748-1d54-411a-b62a-a3691d6decd9-image.jpeg]