\o/

Next release will have multi-VM import 🙂

@lawrencesystems said in XCP-ng 8.3 public alpha 🚀:

I did not find any issues and nothing broke using it so I need to try harder. 😉

Maybe we should incentivize with a bounty: find bugs in XCP-ng 8.3, get a T-shirt 😄

Good news!!

@jchua We currently don't have a test version planned for XCP-ng 8.3. Only 8.2 is supported for the moment.

@stormi

@stormi said in New patch - sudo:

Better not install security patches that require a reboot without rebooting. All you create is a discrepancy between what resides in memory and what is on disk, and in rare cases things may break, for no added security.

Isn't this only true with specific patches? I'm no expert here so really just curious. Regardless I ALWAYS plan to reboot with ANY patches coming out and think others should do the same.

@stormi said in New patch - sudo:

We want to provide better metadata associated with updates, for XO to display. This is not ready yet, so for the time being, check the instructions for each update on the official blog. The update tag will list only update announcement: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/tag/update/

This is great news, love to see it!

I'd like to get first to build our XO Packer plugin, that will help us a load to build those 🙂 So as soon we got it, we'll create more templates, including Fedora 🙂

Indeed, there's no reason to reinvent the wheel. We always prefer to work together, there's too many things to do 🙂

@wyatt-made No such thing is known. I just haven't checked the compatibility yet.

I've set up a test-environment and indeed it worked. Commvault was (is?) checking for specific version/agent string when connecting to XS/CHV/XCP-ng and in older versions refused to connect to XCP-ng.

I successfully installed the agent on a proxy-vm (it uses a proxy to ro-mount the VM-VHDs and backup the content), connected the pool, delivered the VM-inventory and also ran a successful backup:
171c0956-e3e2-4fb9-a93b-48a2be6751bb-grafik.png

In other words: If you're using Commvault (11.28+) you're not any longer locked on Citrix.

So as everyone could spot, XenServer is now a dedicated business unit inside Cloud Software Group. Funnily enough, they are back with the old name, and are more independent.

IMHO, that's good news, and we hope to continue to develop our partnership with them!

It is, and it's XOSTOR 😉

Don't get me wrong: constructive feedback is ALWAYS welcome 🙂
This is just the pricing "cards", but there's already the information that you have initial setup assistance, upgrade help and direct access to XCP-ng devs. Sounds more than just "send us an email when you need". What would you have wrote then?

Also, regarding not paying the project but hire people to contribute on it: I'm very fine with it!

@KPS Hi. This thread is now inactive sop please open a new thread dedicated to your issue.

You can import the VHD file via our REST API, see https://xen-orchestra.com/docs/restapi.html#vdi-import

Great. Thanks for checking this. 🙂