This is not just a powerful symbolic thing: by closing issue n°1, we are really reaffirming our independance and our capacity to build everything without using any binary provided by Citrix.

It's really a great news for XCP-ng's future!

https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/issues/1

olivierlambert created this issue in xcp-ng/xcp

closed Build components from the sources #1

Since last week, we have a new team member @ronan-a is now part of Vates XCP-ng team, with @stormi and myself.

@r1 and @johnelse are still with us as external contributors.

@ronan-a , feel free to introduce yourself here (and the stuff you are working on)

https://xcp-ng.org/docs/

It's far from being complete, but it's a great first step in improving XCP-ng existing documentation and also visibility/credibility!

Everyone can still contribute (link on the bottom of each page), even if it's a bit more difficult than the wiki.

Let me know what you think about it

What about the wiki? We'll probably to continue to have very specific content there, and "promote" content to the doc if it "fits" for enough people.

https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2020/04/17/100-000-downloads-for-xcp-ng/

So you probably spotted the news, feel free to comment here

What about this one?

To avoid splitting the community, we'll merge XO forum in this category. It seems not possible (or very not trivial) to fetch the previous XO threads here, so we'll probably have a transition time until we redirect directly XO forum URL toward this category directly.

Maybe it wasn't clear? French gov won't do anything in the project, they just support it as a research and dev project boosting innovation, and indirectly contributing to create more jobs that can't be replicated easily elsewhere.

There's no "control" on how we decide to do the R&D, as long as we put resources into it as we said.

XCP-ng is a free and community project, and everybody who want to contribute can do it. There's no "link" between us and any government.

So far we got 4 templates available:

• Debian 10 cloudinit ready/disk growable/DHCP
• CentOS 8 cloudinit ready/disk growable/DHCP
• PfSense 2.4
• Alpine Linux 3.10

Would you like other OS? Or even apps installed in those OS? Let us know!

1. Why not using XO from the sources?
2. Fast clone shouldn't be restricted to Enterprise, sounds more like a bug than anything else. In short, XOA Free should cover all features of XCP-ng Center.
3. We also have possible plans for XO lite, a "XCP-ng Center" like embed in the host UI directly.

Less yellowish terminal to use less different colors and keeping the variations in the logo:

A remote is mounted from XO virtual Appliance (XOA), not from your host.

So you need to add an interface in that network, and create a fixed IP that can reach your TrueNas.

Cf https://xcp-ng.org/docs/ecosystem.html#protectli-vault-6-port

And https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2020/09/09/edge-case-2-protectli-hardware/

What you see is the snapshot, not the actual backup. Check the remote location, you'll have files there.

The issue is there: platform record got device-model: qemu-upstream-uefi; but it shouldn't.

If you have decent perf with your apps on it, I would say it's fine.

64KHz seems a display bug more than a real number to me.

On my Dell R620 I have Avg freq 2473030 KHz.

It might be easier for us to assist with a support ticket, so we can use a remote tunnel to check directly on your XOA

Hi,

I assume you are using XOA. What's the result of xoa check?

First thing I have in mind is to use xo-cli, but I'm not sure you can play with vUSB in this CLI.

A kind of workaround would be to have a cron in the host that will shutdown and unplug the USB device (just before the backup job), and then will do the opposite few minutes later.

Thanks for the feedback @mathiashedberg !

Report plugin is what you need.