Subcategories

  • All Xen related stuff

    540 Topics
    5k Posts
    olivierlambertO

    It's very likely in Xen itself since a part of the power management is done there. Another topic to bring during the Xen Winter Meetup @TeddyAstie 😉

  • The integrated web UI to manage XCP-ng

    12 Topics
    229 Posts
    E

    @DustinB

    Hi Dustin,

    It's amazing what one can miss when setting something up, and I surely did miss that part. I now see much more in the way of management items. My project for the weekend will be XO/XOCE from source for my home rack. Thanks so much for seeing what I didn't.

    Take care,

    Eric

  • Section dedicated to migrations from VMWare, HyperV, Proxmox etc. to XCP-ng

    77 Topics
    958 Posts
    DanpD

    @taghjichte Try importing the OVA files using XOA (Import > VM).

  • Hardware related section

    95 Topics
    964 Posts
    D

    @Shrubbery said in xcp-ng 8.3 not recognizing all host memory:

    The issue was memory reserved for the integrated graphics card

    haha.. that is such a silly thing... but good to know then next time I'm working on some hardware and wondering where the RAM is going too...

  • The place to discuss new additions into XCP-ng

    231 Topics
    3k Posts
    olivierlambertO

    No specific plans as this kind of feature isn't really useful in Datacenters. However, if there's a way that's relatively universal, it's doable with the help of the community (ie contributions are very welcome and we'll review it seriously)

  • Migrate windows from Xeon Silver to older Xeon or AMD?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1 Views
    No one has replied
  • Openstack vs xcp-ng (XO)

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    39 Views
    olivierlambertO

    Hi,

    It's a very vast question, but in a way, yes, you can achieve a similar result. OpenStack is directly design with the public cloud in mind, XO is not. However, you can leverage the API and even use existing features to enjoy something that can answer your needs.

  • XCP-ng host - Power management

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    235 Views
    A

    @tjkreidl We don't need performance, but we do need to test how XCP-ng pools, networking, migration, live migration, backup, import from VMware and so on work. It's just a playground where we can have relatively many XCP-ng hosts, but it's not about performance, it's about efficiency and low requirements, because it's just a playground where we learn, validate how things work, and prepare the process for the final migration from VMware to XCP-ng. We originally had two R630s ready for this, then 4, but that would have been unnecessary, given the power consumption, to have physical hypervisors, so in the end we decided to virtualize it all. Well, on ESXi it's because XCP-ng works seamlessly there in nested virtualization.

  • Citrix or XCP-ng drivers for Windows Server 2022

    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    710 Views
    F

    @WayneSherman

    Thanks for this.

  • 1 Votes
    8 Posts
    86 Views
    S

    @spcmediaco

    FYI, I never figured out how to fix. I am doing backup recovery now.

  • 0 Votes
    20 Posts
    561 Views
    A

    @dinhngtu It happened again to me.... Windows 10 22H2 on XCP 8.2.1...

    Same issue as others. Windows reports a USB driver issue. Disabling/re-enabling the windows driver makes it work again.

    To answer your question, Yes, reverting to a snapshot with memory keeps the problem of a failed USB/mouse.

  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    119 Views
    julien-fJ

    @Bambos A timeout error means that the host did not reply in the expected delay, which, if I'm remembering correctly is 5 minutes.

    I suspect a problem on your host but we will take a look further on your support ticket.

  • GRUB waits for confirmation

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    179 Views
    J

    @techknowbabble said in GRUB waits for confirmation:

    What did finally work was re-installing with the 'no serial' option and everything seems to be working as expected now. I only have a handful of XCP-NG installations under my belt but I wonder if this is a known bug or if anyone else has had a similar experience.

    It's not something I've ever seen before and I've done quite a few installations but I can think of some possibilities as to why something like that might fix the problem. My best guess is that there's something built into, connected to, or otherwise in your system that looks like a serial port (maybe even a real serial port) that spits out a character or two into the system at boot time, confusing GRUB and stopping the normal boot process. The bad KVM I mentioned before was doing something like that, throwing a bogus keypress into the system at boot time.

  • Wide VMs on XCP-ng

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    336 Views
    planedropP

    @plaidypus Ah gotcha, this makes sense.

    I second scaling out instead of up.

    If you're getting new hosts, I'd also keep in mind newer CPUs do have much higher per core performance (not sure what your current stuff is), so you also might be able to get away with less vCPUs and lower likelihood of NUMA spanning.

    Either way though I think scaling out is the better direction to go.

  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    4 Views
    No one has replied
  • VM cannot be migrated after NICs of one host died

    Solved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    80 Views
    DanpD

    @hansve You're welcome.

  • block tdc: sector-size: 512/512 capacity: 20938752

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    65 Views
    K

    @apz I see. Thanks.

  • 0 Votes
    21 Posts
    471 Views
    daveD

    @R2rho yeah, there are Supermicro systems with AM5 which can handle a decent amount of load, like based on the h13sae-mf, like:

    https://www.supermicro.com/de/products/system/mainstream/1u/as-1015a-mt
    (with less depth)

    Seem to be stable, but we have a small issue regarding onboard graphics ATM:

    https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/9976/black-screen-after-install-on-supermicro-h13sae-mf-with-ryzen-9950x/3?_=1734419502978

  • VM not booting after attaching GPU

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    50 Views
    DanpD

    You should start by checking the logs. https://docs.xcp-ng.org/troubleshooting/log-files/

  • XCP-ng v8.3 Host Crashing Upon Console Login and Performing Any Action

    Solved
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    144 Views
    bleaderB

    Thanks for letting us know, and I'm happy you have thing working nicely now.
    I think to mark this as resolved you need to convert your original post as a question, and it can then be marked as resolved. I actually cannot do it myself, I think only a few people have the permission to do it for others at Vates.

  • Change VM RAM

    Solved
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    95 Views
    olivierlambertO

    Enjoy XO & XCP-ng then 🙂

  • host time and xoa time are not consistent with each other

    Solved
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    120 Views
    C

    @olivierlambert

    I resolved it, logged in the XCP-ng console and set the NTP servers to default. All good now.
    Thanks

    xcp-ntp2.png

  • reboot of host does it stop or kill running VM's?

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    533 Views
    V

    I have yet to successfully reboot a host from XO. I have tools installed on three out of four VM. I try shutting down the VM without tools, then issue reboot host in XO GUI. Get warning:
    Some VMs cannot be migrated without first rebooting this host. Please try force reboot.

    Is this a setting perhaps?

    I'm always needing to shutdown all VMs before I can reboot the host. It is a single host environment, so there will never be an available server to migrate VMs to.

    Rebooting in XSCONSOLE causes the host to be unavailable in XO. I have to remove then add the host back in XO.

    Can anyone shed light as to what I'm doing wrong?

    Do I just need to always run the following after a reboot?
    xe host-enable host=xxxx

  • Cloning Windows VMs

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    99 Views
    D

    Preferably after, since the PV drivers contain some VM-specific settings that may be wiped by Sysprep.

  • Issues with XCP-ng Windows PV Tools 9.0.9000.0 Testsign Pre-release

    6
    1 Votes
    6 Posts
    159 Views
    W

    @dinhngtu said in Issues with XCP-ng Windows PV Tools 9.0.9000.0 Testsign Pre-release:

    With 9.0.9000.0, you could sometimes run into this issue if you reboot too early after installing. This will also be fixed in the next release.

    I just did two more tests and the boot-up failure happened both times. On the last test I waited some time (like 30 to 60 sec) after the driver installation before rebooting (using Windows restart from the start menu). Even though I waited before rebooting I still encountered the boot-up problem:

    Windows is spinning on this screen and doesn't finish booting:
    ef30a370-5897-41e6-a0f1-41fa3720dacb-image.png