1. Home
  2. XCP-ng

Subcategories

  • All Xen related stuff

    622 Topics
    6k Posts
    P
    @flakpyro said: EDIT: The solution here is to get "Power/Performance Bias:" to OS Controlled in the servers BIOS. This restores functionality. hey nice ! I did the modification on a slave server and I now have all informations (previously FAILED) [image: 1786472883253-32aede5f-d4bb-44fd-acad-029715ca1bdf-image.jpeg] it's an HPE DL380 Gen 11 modified in the iLO web ui, but then needed to reboot host was previously on DYNAMIC POWER SAVINGS [image: 1786472960757-f2d02bca-04eb-4a06-8844-c073e9d9b93a-image.jpeg]

  • The integrated web UI to manage XCP-ng

    29 Topics
    367 Posts
    olivierlambertO
    The same as @john.c and also XO Lite tends to be less a priority because less critical than the full fledged XO (the priority is to replace entirely XO 5 in the next releases). Why you would need XO Lite outside basic actions? It's mostly meant to bootstrap XO itself and do basic operations (which is already the case, at least with many basic features already). Initially, the goal hasn't moved: replacing XenCenter. We are moving in that direction, but again, I think it's more important to get XO 6 finished first. I'm curious to understand more the use case of XO Lite in your context @unreal-shizzle ?

  • Section dedicated to migrations from VMWare, HyperV, Proxmox etc. to XCP-ng

    128 Topics
    1k Posts
    acebmxerA
    If i recall from my migration I belive thats all there is to it. I know the docs mention about doing a test migration but mine just migrated and it just worked as you stated after making the needed adjustments. Let other chime in but i think you are good to go. And you could delete the snapshot from the vm.

  • Hardware related section

    174 Topics
    2k Posts
    gduperreyG
    @yllar Hello, We are still validating the ISOs, but we are getting closer to releasing them. We hope to make them available soon.

  • The place to discuss new additions into XCP-ng

    254 Topics
    3k Posts
    Maelstrom96M
    @benapetr Good news, seems like the latest version for SM will implement vdi_revert which should work nicely with Ceph RBD. The only thing now is to have the newer Ceph kernel drivers in XCP-ng since the current driver is very old... (v12 I believe, we're now at v20, soon v22)
Log in to post
Load new posts
  • ?

    XCP-ng v8.3 Host Crashing Upon Console Login and Performing Any Action

    Solved
    6
    1
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    892 Views
    bleaderB
    Thanks for letting us know, and I'm happy you have thing working nicely now. I think to mark this as resolved you need to convert your original post as a question, and it can then be marked as resolved. I actually cannot do it myself, I think only a few people have the permission to do it for others at Vates.
  • C

    Change VM RAM

    Solved
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    olivierlambertO
    Enjoy XO & XCP-ng then
  • C

    host time and xoa time are not consistent with each other

    Solved
    4
    1
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    @olivierlambert I resolved it, logged in the XCP-ng console and set the NTP servers to default. All good now. Thanks [image: 1733066154172-xcp-ntp2.png]
  • C

    Cloning Windows VMs

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    D
    Preferably after, since the PV drivers contain some VM-specific settings that may be wiped by Sysprep.
  • W

    Issues with XCP-ng Windows PV Tools 9.0.9000.0 Testsign Pre-release

    6
    1
    1 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    W
    @dinhngtu said in Issues with XCP-ng Windows PV Tools 9.0.9000.0 Testsign Pre-release: With 9.0.9000.0, you could sometimes run into this issue if you reboot too early after installing. This will also be fixed in the next release. I just did two more tests and the boot-up failure happened both times. On the last test I waited some time (like 30 to 60 sec) after the driver installation before rebooting (using Windows restart from the start menu). Even though I waited before rebooting I still encountered the boot-up problem: Windows is spinning on this screen and doesn't finish booting: [image: 1732291273907-ef30a370-5897-41e6-a0f1-41fa3720dacb-image.png]
  • M

    Best way for automatic creation of Linux FDE VMs with secure boot and VTPM using IaC

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    olivierlambertO
    I wasn't aware of this plugin even existing (thanks for the discovery). I'm not sure it's really maintained, but we have a clear goal of getting one officially maintained anyway.
  • G

    Windows Admin Center extensions for XCP?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    G
    @olivierlambert Which one, powershell or WAC. They are kind of one in the same when you look at how WAC makes the calls to do the work, there's a button to reveal the powershell behind the button clicks so you might be able to get both at once. But WAC draws nice graphs and gives us a GUI to get the work done. Yes I know, real Admins don't use GUI. Whatever, AI will eat our jobs anyway, just trying to stick it out another 9 years at this point. When I get time, I'll still probably take a swing at this task for WAC, because to me this would be valuable. Big learning curve though. Now if MS would finally add Group Policy to WAC and fix some of the DHCP and DNS features that are still in preview...
  • D

    xenserver - net 9.1.7.65 issues

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    931 Views
    D
    @dinhngtu Ah thank you! Idk why I couldn't find that on my own, I searched for a while.
  • M

    Xapi service missing

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    DanpD
    According to the documentation, you only need xfsprogs.
  • J

    Error migration

    3
    1
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    524 Views
    olivierlambertO
    I'm not aware of such problem it's like the VM was kept in limbo. You did the right thing with your commands.
  • M

    Can pass through all NICs except one

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    283 Views
    No one has replied
  • J

    SMB share write performance issue windows server 2019

    4
    3
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    D
    Hello, I've tried benchmarking several Windows VMs from another client and am getting expected performance: Read: .\diskspd.exe -c1G -d10 -Su -Sw g:\data.dat Write: .\diskspd.exe -c1G -d10 -Su -Sw -w100 g:\data.dat Windows Server 2022: Read IO thread | bytes | I/Os | MiB/s | I/O per s | file ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 | 1151533056 | 17571 | 109.72 | 1755.53 | g:\data.dat (1GiB) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ total: 1151533056 | 17571 | 109.72 | 1755.53 Write IO thread | bytes | I/Os | MiB/s | I/O per s | file ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 | 966000640 | 14740 | 92.12 | 1473.98 | g:\data.dat (1GiB) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ total: 966000640 | 14740 | 92.12 | 1473.98 Windows 11 24H2 (with Eset): Read IO thread | bytes | I/Os | MiB/s | I/O per s | file ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 | 1100283904 | 16789 | 104.81 | 1677.01 | g:\data.dat (1GiB) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ total: 1100283904 | 16789 | 104.81 | 1677.01 Write IO thread | bytes | I/Os | MiB/s | I/O per s | file ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 | 931594240 | 14215 | 88.82 | 1421.07 | g:\data.dat (1GiB) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ total: 931594240 | 14215 | 88.82 | 1421.07 Several questions: Are you running benchmarks on a separate virtual disk? If not, could you try again using a share created from a separate virtual disk? Could you run CrystalDiskMark locally on these VMs and see the performance? You mentioned that Eset security takes up 100% CPU during the benchmark. Could you try temporarily uninstalling Eset and testing again?
  • J

    USB Passthrough speed issue

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    6k Views
    olivierlambertO
    Thanks for your feedback. In the meantime, I will plan a "spike" to investigate the status of USB speed on passthrough.
  • A

    8.3 USB Passthrough - Win Server 2019 BSOD

    19
    1
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    4k Views
    M
    @andsmith windbg is also a regular win32 app and is included in any recent windows SDK. Here: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/downloads/windows-sdk/ You just need windbg so deselect all the other crap.
  • H

    VDI export of running VM

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    olivierlambertO
    Yes, you can use XO webhooks (IIRC) to trigger something before or after a backup and send the request to a custom agent you made inside the VM. But I'm not sure to get it, can you provide what do you want to achieve, not the technical solution (script VM backup is already a solution, not the problem you are trying to solve)
  • K

    Is Cold Migration of VMs from XCP-ng 8.3 back to 8.2.1 Not Supported?

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    stormiS
    @andrewperry The release notes warn about PV guests.
  • L

    8.3 cannot contact other host using TLS

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    470 Views
    No one has replied
  • P

    XO-lite issue - 8.3 / IPv6

    2
    1
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    586 Views
    BenjiReisB
    @PimAarts hi! Thx for the report - I reproduced the issue and am investigating. Meanwhile clicking on Cancel will give you access to XOLite
  • M

    Failed upgrade to 8.3 now stuck on grub

    7
    2
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    olivierlambertO
    2 times the charm I have no idea why it failed initially, but at least you tested the magic rollback As you can see, it's really a GREAT feature
  • T

    Host not running VMs after update

    16
    2
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    4k Views
    T
    We are now live again with all the VMs - which is a relief. The above steps from @stormi were great, the one thing I notced was the /etc/stunnel/certs directory didn't exist. I created that manually and everything else seemed happy. I did have to mess about a bit with the fibre NICs, but I've repeated the previous renaming and that's now running fine. Thanks very much for all the help - I appreciate it.