@stormi Installed on our 2 production pools, DR and remote sites, 46 hosts total ranging from Dell, Lenovo, HP, and Supermicro servers, no issues to report!
Best posts made by flakpyro
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
@gduperrey Updated my usual test hosts, (Minisforum and Supermicro X11) as well as an two sets of 2 host AMD pools (one pool of HP DL320 Gen10s and another of Asus Epyc servers of some sort, and lastly a Dell R360 without issue.
-
RE: log_fs_usage / /var/log directory on pool master filling up constantly
One of our pools. (5 hosts, 6 NFS SRs) had this issue when we first deployed it. I engaged with support from Vates and they changed a setting that reduced the frequency of the SR.scan job from 30 seconds to every 2 mins instead. This totally fixed the issue for us going on a year and a half later.
I dug back in our documentation and found the command they gave us
xe host-param-set other-config:auto-scan-interval=120 uuid=<Host UUID>Where hosts UUID is your pool master.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
@stormi Installed on my usual test hosts (Intel Minisforum MS-01, and Supermicro running a Xeon E-2336 CPU). Also installed onto a 2 host AMD epyc pool. Updates went smooth, backups continue to function as before.
3 windows 11 VMs had secure boot enabled. In XOA i clicked "Copy pool's default UEFI certificates to the VM" after the update was complete. The VMs continued to boot without issue after.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
installed on 2 test machines
Machine 1:
Intel Xeon E-2336
SuperMicro board.Machine 2:
Minisforum MS-01
i9-13900H
32 GB Ram
Using Intel X710 onboard NICBoth machines installed fine and all VMs came up without issue after. My one test backup job also seemed to run without any issues.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
@gduperrey installed on 2 test machines
Machine 1:
Intel Xeon E-2336
SuperMicro board.Machine 2:
Minisforum MS-01
i9-13900H
32 GB Ram
Using Intel X710 onboard NICBoth machines installed fine and all VMs came up without issue after.
I ran a backup job after to test snapshot coalesce, no issues there.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
@stormi Updated a test machine running only couple VMs. Everything installed fine and rebooted without issue.
Machine is:
Intel Xeon E-2336
SuperMicro board.
One VM happens to be windows based with an Nvidia GPU passed though to it running Blue Iris using the MSR fixed found elsewhere on these forums, fix continues to work with this version of Xen.
-
RE: CBT: the thread to centralize your feedback
@dthenot @olivierlambert thanks guys ill hold off on submitting a ticket for now to keep the conversation centralized here but if you need any more info, would like me to try anything or would like a remote support tunnel opened just let me know!

-
RE: Host failure after patches
@McHenry i think the command you need to run on a current slave is
xe pool-emergency-transition-to-master followed by xe-toolstack-restartThis will make that slave the new pool master. You should only do this though if the current pool master for sure dead.
This may also be useful:
https://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xenserver/8/dr/machine-failures.html -
RE: XO (self build) tasks spamming
@olivierlambert On my test instance which is admittedly not very busy (only 2 hosts) this fixed the issue!
Latest posts made by flakpyro
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
@stormi Installed on my usual test hosts probably an hour after your initial post and let them run thoughout the day (Intel Minisforum MS-01, and Supermicro running a Xeon E-2336 CPU). Also installed onto a 2 host AMD epyc pool. Updates went smooth, backups continue to function as before.
A couple of windows VMs had secure boot enabled on our test pool. After the initial reboot i ran " secureboot-certs clear" on the pool master, then In XOA i clicked "Copy pool's default UEFI certificates to the VM" after that. The VMs continued to reboot without issue after. Strange to see someone else having issues with VMs not booting.
-
RE: CBT disabling itself / bug ?
@Pilow Sounds very similar to my experiences with CBT.
Check out my post here (and keep reading from that point down)
https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/88968Can you check with the same commands i used?
-
RE: log_fs_usage / /var/log directory on pool master filling up constantly
One of our pools. (5 hosts, 6 NFS SRs) had this issue when we first deployed it. I engaged with support from Vates and they changed a setting that reduced the frequency of the SR.scan job from 30 seconds to every 2 mins instead. This totally fixed the issue for us going on a year and a half later.
I dug back in our documentation and found the command they gave us
xe host-param-set other-config:auto-scan-interval=120 uuid=<Host UUID>Where hosts UUID is your pool master.
-
RE: Lock file is already being held whereas no backup are running.
@henri9813 This is 100% related to the merge process still running in the background. I have seen it happen myself.
-
RE: [Old thread] XCP-ng Windows PV tools 9.0.9030 Testsign released: now with Rust-based Xen Guest Agent
@dinhngtu Thanks. We plan to migrate all Windows VMs from the Citrix tools down the road and only have a handful of VMs running these so far so will maybe hold off until the next version. Have been running the Linux rust tools for over a year with zero issues..

-
RE: [Old thread] XCP-ng Windows PV tools 9.0.9030 Testsign released: now with Rust-based Xen Guest Agent
@dinhngtu An issue i ran into in testing the final signed release.
On a Server 2025 VM after installing the tools the version is properly displayed in XOA, however after a migration the version is not displayed and instead "Management agent not detected" is shown, memory stats also stop displaying in XOA. After restarting the Rust tools service in windows however XOA picks up on the tools running within the VM again.
-
RE: VM start stuck on "Guest has not initialized the display (yet)."
@dinhngtu said in VM start stuck on "Guest has not initialized the display (yet).":
You must run secureboot-certs clear if you're updating from 1.2.0-2.4 or 1.2.0-3.1 and have previously run secureboot-certs install with the above versions installed.
Should we run this before installing the update or after 1.2.0-3.2 has been installed?
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
@dinhngtu The output of that command seems to result in the output of "Scanningn every UUID in my pool", most of which do not use SB. Im guessing that normal and i do not have any affected VMs any longer?
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
Awesome thanks for the response. I took a snapshot and tried rebooting a VM and it booted back up without issue simply by clicking the propagate button on each affecting VM after reverting and running "secureboot-certs install"
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
@dinhngtu Ah okay, i was wondering if "d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f" indicated i was back on the safe certs since it is the same on all VMs since reverting and clicking "Copy the pools default UEFI Certificates to the VM"
So i need to run
varstore-rm f9166a11-3c3f-33f1-505c-542ce8e1764d d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f dbxwhile powered off to be safe?