XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    296 Posts 34 Posters 91.9k Views 50 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F Offline
      flakpyro @dinhngtu
      last edited by

      @dinhngtu Ah okay, i was wondering if "d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f" indicated i was back on the safe certs since it is the same on all VMs since reverting and clicking "Copy the pools default UEFI Certificates to the VM"

      So i need to run

      varstore-rm f9166a11-3c3f-33f1-505c-542ce8e1764d d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f dbx
      

      while powered off to be safe?

      F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • F Offline
        flakpyro @flakpyro
        last edited by

        Awesome thanks for the response. I took a snapshot and tried rebooting a VM and it booted back up without issue simply by clicking the propagate button on each affecting VM after reverting and running "secureboot-certs install"

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A Offline
          acebmxer
          last edited by

          @stormi would this issue cause this behavior? VM stuck at startup...

          Screenshot 2025-10-24 091455.png

          Screenshot 2025-10-24 091510.png

          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D Offline
            dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @acebmxer
            last edited by dinhngtu

            @acebmxer Looks like it. You can recover by installing a preliminary test update here:

            wget https://koji.xcp-ng.org/repos/user/8/8.3/xcpng-users.repo -O /etc/yum.repos.d/xcpng-users.repo
            yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-ndinh1 varstored varstored-tools
            secureboot-certs clear
            

            Then propagate SB certs to make sure that subsequent dbx updates will run normally.

            Sorry for the inconvenience.

            G A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • G Offline
              Greg_E @dinhngtu
              last edited by

              @dinhngtu

              I was just getting ready to go update my pool... So is it safe now? And do these certs only affect Secure Boot VMs or UEFI VMs as well?

              D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Offline
                acebmxer @dinhngtu
                last edited by acebmxer

                @dinhngtu Thank you for that reply.

                Just to clarify I have 4 host. 2 host i updated to latest update once they became available to public via pool updates. The other 2 host I had to push the second beta release to get command secureboot-certs install to work. Then I pushed the rest of the update again once they became public.

                So far im only seeing 1 vm having the issue on the later 2 host the had the beta updates installed. There that test PC and 1 windows server (Printsrver), xoproxy, and xoce.

                Should i run those commands on all 4 host or just the later 2 with the troubled vm?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D Offline
                  dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Greg_E
                  last edited by

                  @Greg_E said in XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing:

                  @dinhngtu

                  I was just getting ready to go update my pool... So is it safe now? And do these certs only affect Secure Boot VMs or UEFI VMs as well?

                  This problem will affect UEFI VMs. See the announcement above for more details.

                  In short, if you haven't updated, you should be safe; the offending update has been withdrawn and no longer available from yum update (as long as you're not using the testing branch).

                  @acebmxer said in XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing:

                  @dinhngtu Thank you for that reply.

                  Just to clarify I have 4 host. 2 host i updated to latest update once they became available to public via pool updates. The other 2 host I had to push the second beta release to get command secureboot-certs install to work. Then I pushed the rest of the update again once they became public.

                  So far im only seeing 1 vm having the issue on the later 2 host the had the beta updates installed. There that test PC and 1 windows server (Printsrver), xoproxy, and xoce.

                  Should i run those commands on all 4 host or just the later 2 with the troubled vm?

                  I haven't tested using different versions of varstored within the same pool.

                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A Offline
                    acebmxer @dinhngtu
                    last edited by acebmxer

                    @dinhngtu

                    All 4 host have the same version. They were just not updated the same way at the same time was the point i was making and that so far only 1 vm seems to be affected.

                    But i guess to play it self i should downgrade all 4 host.

                    Edit - ran the following commands on master host of pool with the vm with issue. VM now boots up.

                    Sorry for all the questions.

                    wget https://koji.xcp-ng.org/repos/user/8/8.3/xcpng-users.repo -O /etc/yum.repos.d/xcpng-users.repo
                    yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-ndinh1 varstored varstored-tools
                    secureboot-certs clear
                    

                    Should run that above commands on all the remaining host?

                    Or should i run this command on any of the four host?

                    yum downgrade varstored-1.2.0-2.3.xcpng8.3
                    
                    D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D Offline
                      dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @acebmxer
                      last edited by dinhngtu

                      @acebmxer You can confirm if there are other affected VMs using this command:

                      xe vm-list --minimal | xargs -d, -Ix sh -c "echo Scanning x 1>&2; varstore-ls x" > /dev/null
                      

                      If there are still affected VMs, you must fix them on varstored-1.2.0-3.2 by secureboot-certs clear + propagating before downgrading to 2.3 (if you wish).

                      Note that downgrading to 2.3 with pool certs cleared means you'll need to set up guest Secure Boot again. So I recommend staying on 3.2 if it's possible for you.

                      F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • F Offline
                        flakpyro @dinhngtu
                        last edited by

                        @dinhngtu The output of that command seems to result in the output of "Scanningn every UUID in my pool", most of which do not use SB. Im guessing that normal and i do not have any affected VMs any longer?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A Offline
                          acebmxer
                          last edited by

                          I opened a support ticket #7746470

                          I get the following from different host...

                          Pool1 Master host:
                          [09:48 xcp-ng-vyadytkn ~]# xe vm-list --minimal | xargs -d, -Ix sh -c "echo Scanning x 1>&2; varstore-ls x" > /dev/null
                          Scanning ab9e8cde-fad8-5089-29c8-c904a810857a
                          Scanning d2025b59-6268-6bb9-28cd-e4812395563c
                          Scanning 4567b8da-3a3c-00a4-cf6b-ccdae302a645
                          Scanning 291f9d05-88c8-fc37-107a-368a55c649be
                          Scanning 88d7ba09-e65a-dd82-8d45-ec3df3e3f9d4
                          Scanning bcc182c6-dbb7-33c4-3e8b-c7db9b246e7b
                          Scanning 5a2c18ca-e9ce-abfc-8bd7-2794f94c6c3a
                          Scanning f4a4669a-2baf-47f2-b16a-08f60963e922
                          Scanning d4352870-d73c-5cda-9470-ffd7cd01e251
                          Scanning b0c21701-7309-dd9c-fa2a-bdc84a24565e
                          Scanning 342b470e-fac9-6579-f82d-2517b8de6112
                          Scanning 2c21c005-9230-f3f3-cdf6-2d39407b3456
                          Scanning 102a5ac2-ab7f-68ca-9fa1-b549d64ec4a9
                          Scanning c9dadc90-6fb8-eee7-d3e5-e1ae1024a77f
                          Scanning 5703adef-d804-6b15-ba2f-7b3357a711bb
                          Scanning a8858f86-ceab-2d5d-5d46-1b083c3fa399
                          Scanning 82b191df-a63c-4357-b618-4467f714008a
                          
                          Pool 2 Master host (Problem VM)
                          
                          [10:02 localhost ~]# xe vm-list --minimal | xargs -d, -Ix sh -c "echo Scanning x 1>&2; varstore-ls x" > /dev/null
                          Scanning ece6db75-533b-5359-1a99-28d5dc1a6912
                          Scanning c81f1f1b-9f95-38ec-f96e-5ce8fea073e6
                          unserialize_variables: Tolerating oversized data 60440 > 57344
                          Scanning 4fb6dee8-c251-93e6-0c20-b1c1c67351ba
                          Scanning 8a570993-6522-c837-0931-6fd1812dbd96
                          Scanning b31749b8-bc1a-0e8a-a864-50a06391592e
                          Scanning bf1b61d5-14ca-9f0e-7040-24c177693cea
                          Scanning af6eeff7-5640-28a9-dbdb-87f094a04665
                          Scanning 43ba924b-8bf7-4a50-b258-2e977f6f2f0c
                          Scanning 5a625c92-3702-2ce6-1790-39497745e83c
                          Scanning 9f36a8c5-c988-8546-b0f9-30ac9d0a5015
                          Scanning a7f5b1bb-7fe2-d0b5-5187-f29e5d4d15d7
                          
                          
                          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • G Offline
                            Greg_E
                            last edited by

                            My production pool upgraded fine as far as I can tell, but not so good with the windows drivers, I'll make a thread on the drivers.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • D Offline
                              dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @acebmxer
                              last edited by

                              @flakpyro said in XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing:

                              @dinhngtu The output of that command seems to result in the output of "Scanningn every UUID in my pool", most of which do not use SB. Im guessing that normal and i do not have any affected VMs any longer?

                              Yes, it'll produce an error message in unserialize_variables when there's a problem.

                              @acebmxer Scanning on 1 host will scan the whole pool at once.

                              In the output you posted, there's only c81f1f1b-9f95-38ec-f96e-5ce8fea073e6 which needs fixing.

                              A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • A Offline
                                acebmxer @dinhngtu
                                last edited by

                                @dinhngtu

                                @acebmxer Scanning on 1 host will scan the whole pool at once.

                                In the output you posted, there's only c81f1f1b-9f95-38ec-f96e-5ce8fea073e6 which needs fixing.

                                That is the same pool/host i ran the following command on.

                                wget https://koji.xcp-ng.org/repos/user/8/8.3/xcpng-users.repo -O /etc/yum.repos.d/xcpng-users.repo
                                yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-ndinh1 varstored varstored-tools
                                secureboot-certs clear
                                

                                The vm being called out is the vm that would not boot that is booting now after running the above command.

                                Is this the command i need to run?

                                varstore-rm c81f1f1b-9f95-38ec-f96e-5ce8fea073e6 d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f dbx
                                
                                D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • D Offline
                                  dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @acebmxer
                                  last edited by

                                  @acebmxer Yes, that'll fix the situation.

                                  Note that we're discussing a different approach for the official update, which will involve using a manual repair tool.

                                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • A Offline
                                    acebmxer @dinhngtu
                                    last edited by

                                    @dinhngtu
                                    Thank you for all the help. See output below. Please let me know if you would like for me to test anything from my side.

                                    [10:02 localhost ~]# xe vm-list --minimal | xargs -d, -Ix sh -c "echo Scanning x 1>&2; varstore-ls x" > /dev/null
                                    Scanning ece6db75-533b-5359-1a99-28d5dc1a6912
                                    Scanning c81f1f1b-9f95-38ec-f96e-5ce8fea073e6
                                    unserialize_variables: Tolerating oversized data 60440 > 57344
                                    Scanning 4fb6dee8-c251-93e6-0c20-b1c1c67351ba
                                    Scanning 8a570993-6522-c837-0931-6fd1812dbd96
                                    Scanning b31749b8-bc1a-0e8a-a864-50a06391592e
                                    Scanning bf1b61d5-14ca-9f0e-7040-24c177693cea
                                    Scanning af6eeff7-5640-28a9-dbdb-87f094a04665
                                    Scanning 43ba924b-8bf7-4a50-b258-2e977f6f2f0c
                                    Scanning 5a625c92-3702-2ce6-1790-39497745e83c
                                    Scanning 9f36a8c5-c988-8546-b0f9-30ac9d0a5015
                                    Scanning a7f5b1bb-7fe2-d0b5-5187-f29e5d4d15d7
                                    
                                    [10:23 localhost ~]# varstore-rm c81f1f1b-9f95-38ec-f96e-5ce8fea073e6 d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f dbx
                                    unserialize_variables: Tolerating oversized data 60440 > 57344
                                    [11:40 localhost ~]# xe vm-list --minimal | xargs -d, -Ix sh -c "echo Scanning x 1>&2; varstore-ls x" > /dev/null
                                    Scanning ece6db75-533b-5359-1a99-28d5dc1a6912
                                    Scanning c81f1f1b-9f95-38ec-f96e-5ce8fea073e6
                                    Scanning 4fb6dee8-c251-93e6-0c20-b1c1c67351ba
                                    Scanning 8a570993-6522-c837-0931-6fd1812dbd96
                                    Scanning b31749b8-bc1a-0e8a-a864-50a06391592e
                                    Scanning bf1b61d5-14ca-9f0e-7040-24c177693cea
                                    Scanning af6eeff7-5640-28a9-dbdb-87f094a04665
                                    Scanning 43ba924b-8bf7-4a50-b258-2e977f6f2f0c
                                    Scanning 5a625c92-3702-2ce6-1790-39497745e83c
                                    Scanning 9f36a8c5-c988-8546-b0f9-30ac9d0a5015
                                    Scanning a7f5b1bb-7fe2-d0b5-5187-f29e5d4d15d7
                                    [11:40 localhost ~]#
                                    
                                    D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • D Offline
                                      dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @acebmxer
                                      last edited by

                                      @acebmxer All looks good from the output. There might be some VMs that need fixes for Windows dbx updates to work properly, I'll try to add that in the official version.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • First post
                                        Last post