XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

acebmxer

Updated AMD Ryzen pool at home and update two Intel Dell r660 and r640 pools at work. No issues to report back.

marcoi

updated my two hosts without issues.

stormi

IMPORTANT NOTICE!

After publishing the updates, we discovered a very nasty bug when using the UEFI certificates that we distribute. Long story short, they're too big, and there's only limited space (57K), and combined to a preexisting bug in varstored, this will cause the VM to stop booting after Windows or any other OS attempts to append to the DBX (revocation database).

We pulled the varstored update, but those who updated can be affected.

There are conditions for the issue:

Existing VMs are not affected, unless you propagated the new certs to them
New VMs are affected only if you never installed UEFI certs to the pool yourself (through XOA or secureboot-certs install), or cleared them using secureboot-certs clear in order to use our default certificates.

If you have the affected version of varstored (rpm -q varstored yields varstored-1.2.0-3.1.xcpng8.3) :

on every host, downgrade it with yum downgrade varstored-1.2.0-2.3.xcpng8.3. No reboot or toolstack restart required.
if you have affected UEFI VMs, that is VMs that meet the conditions above but are not broken yet, don't install updates, turn them off, and fix them by deleting their DBX database: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/guides/guest-UEFI-Secure-Boot/#remove-certificates-from-a-vm. This has to be done when the VM is off. Your OS will add its own DBX afterwards.
If you already have broken VMs (this warning reaching you too late), revert to a snapshot or backup. Other ways to fix them will require a patched varstored currently in the making.

manilx

@stormi Downgraded all hosts @home and @office. I have not done anything to running Windows Server VM's or touch anything regarding certs. So I guess I'm all good.

stormi

@flakpyro Thanks for letting us know. I suppose there was a mirror that was not ready yet, or had a transient issue, and unfortunately XOA's rolling pool update feature is not very resilient to that at the moment.

flakpyro

@stormi

I reverted the package however i initially followed the directions provided by vates in the release blog post and ran "secureboot-certs clear" then on each VM with Secure boot enabled i clicked "Copy the pools default UEFI Certificates to the VM".

After reverting the updates and running secureboot-certs install again i went back and clicked "Copy the pools default UEFI Certificates to the VM" again thinking it would put the old certs back.

It sounds like this may not be enough and i need to remove the dbx record from each of these VMs. Am i correct or was that enough to fix these VMs?

Per the docs:

varstore-rm <vm-uuid> d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f dbx

Note that the GUID may be found by using varstore-ls <vm-uuid>.

When i run the command i see

Exmaple:

varstore-ls f9166a11-3c3f-33f1-505c-542ce8e1764d
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c SecureBoot
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c DeployedMode
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c AuditMode
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c SetupMode
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c SignatureSupport
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c PK
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c KEK
d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f db
d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f dbx
605dab50-e046-4300-abb6-3dd810dd8b23 SbatLevel
fab7e9e1-39dd-4f2b-8408-e20e906cb6de HDDP
e20939be-32d4-41be-a150-897f85d49829 MemoryOverwriteRequestControl
bb983ccf-151d-40e1-a07b-4a17be168292 MemoryOverwriteRequestControlLock
9d1947eb-09bb-4780-a3cd-bea956e0e056 PPIBuffer
9d1947eb-09bb-4780-a3cd-bea956e0e056 Tcg2PhysicalPresenceFlagsLock
eb704011-1402-11d3-8e77-00a0c969723b MTC
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c Boot0000
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c Timeout
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c Lang
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c PlatformLang
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c ConIn
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c ConOut
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c ErrOut
9d1947eb-09bb-4780-a3cd-bea956e0e056 Tcg2PhysicalPresenceFlags
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c Key0000
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c Key0001
5b446ed1-e30b-4faa-871a-3654eca36080 0050569B1890
937fe521-95ae-4d1a-8929-48bcd90ad31a 0050569B1890
9fb9a8a1-2f4a-43a6-889c-d0f7b6c47ad5 ClientId
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c Boot0003
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c Boot0004
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c Boot0005
4c19049f-4137-4dd3-9c10-8b97a83ffdfa MemoryTypeInformation
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c Boot0006
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c BootOrder
8c136d32-039a-4016-8bb4-9e985e62786f SecretKey
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c Boot0001
8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c Boot0002

So the command would be:

varstore-rm f9166a11-3c3f-33f1-505c-542ce8e1764d d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f dbx correct? 

Does "d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f " indicate the old certs have been re-installed?

dinhngtu

@flakpyro It's in the middle. But the "d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f dbx" part is always the same across all VMs.

After reverting the updates and running secureboot-certs install again

This will create a pool-level dbx which does not have the problem seen in varstored-1.2.0-3.1. So as long as you propagated the variables to all affected VMs without any errors, there's no need to delete them manually. But you can always delete them again if you're not sure.

flakpyro

@dinhngtu Ah okay, i was wondering if "d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f" indicated i was back on the safe certs since it is the same on all VMs since reverting and clicking "Copy the pools default UEFI Certificates to the VM"

So i need to run

varstore-rm f9166a11-3c3f-33f1-505c-542ce8e1764d d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f dbx

while powered off to be safe?

flakpyro

Awesome thanks for the response. I took a snapshot and tried rebooting a VM and it booted back up without issue simply by clicking the propagate button on each affecting VM after reverting and running "secureboot-certs install"

acebmxer

@stormi would this issue cause this behavior? VM stuck at startup...

Screenshot 2025-10-24 091455.png

Screenshot 2025-10-24 091510.png

dinhngtu

@acebmxer Looks like it. You can recover by installing a preliminary test update here:

wget https://koji.xcp-ng.org/repos/user/8/8.3/xcpng-users.repo -O /etc/yum.repos.d/xcpng-users.repo
yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-ndinh1 varstored varstored-tools
secureboot-certs clear

Then propagate SB certs to make sure that subsequent dbx updates will run normally.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Greg_E

@dinhngtu

I was just getting ready to go update my pool... So is it safe now? And do these certs only affect Secure Boot VMs or UEFI VMs as well?

acebmxer

@dinhngtu Thank you for that reply.

Just to clarify I have 4 host. 2 host i updated to latest update once they became available to public via pool updates. The other 2 host I had to push the second beta release to get command secureboot-certs install to work. Then I pushed the rest of the update again once they became public.

So far im only seeing 1 vm having the issue on the later 2 host the had the beta updates installed. There that test PC and 1 windows server (Printsrver), xoproxy, and xoce.

Should i run those commands on all 4 host or just the later 2 with the troubled vm?

dinhngtu

@Greg_E said in XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing:

@dinhngtu

I was just getting ready to go update my pool... So is it safe now? And do these certs only affect Secure Boot VMs or UEFI VMs as well?

This problem will affect UEFI VMs. See the announcement above for more details.

In short, if you haven't updated, you should be safe; the offending update has been withdrawn and no longer available from yum update (as long as you're not using the testing branch).

@acebmxer said in XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing:

@dinhngtu Thank you for that reply.

Just to clarify I have 4 host. 2 host i updated to latest update once they became available to public via pool updates. The other 2 host I had to push the second beta release to get command secureboot-certs install to work. Then I pushed the rest of the update again once they became public.

So far im only seeing 1 vm having the issue on the later 2 host the had the beta updates installed. There that test PC and 1 windows server (Printsrver), xoproxy, and xoce.

Should i run those commands on all 4 host or just the later 2 with the troubled vm?

I haven't tested using different versions of varstored within the same pool.

acebmxer

@dinhngtu

All 4 host have the same version. They were just not updated the same way at the same time was the point i was making and that so far only 1 vm seems to be affected.

But i guess to play it self i should downgrade all 4 host.

Edit - ran the following commands on master host of pool with the vm with issue. VM now boots up.

Sorry for all the questions.

wget https://koji.xcp-ng.org/repos/user/8/8.3/xcpng-users.repo -O /etc/yum.repos.d/xcpng-users.repo
yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-ndinh1 varstored varstored-tools
secureboot-certs clear

Should run that above commands on all the remaining host?

Or should i run this command on any of the four host?

yum downgrade varstored-1.2.0-2.3.xcpng8.3

dinhngtu

@acebmxer You can confirm if there are other affected VMs using this command:

xe vm-list --minimal | xargs -d, -Ix sh -c "echo Scanning x 1>&2; varstore-ls x" > /dev/null

If there are still affected VMs, you must fix them on varstored-1.2.0-3.2 by secureboot-certs clear + propagating before downgrading to 2.3 (if you wish).

Note that downgrading to 2.3 with pool certs cleared means you'll need to set up guest Secure Boot again. So I recommend staying on 3.2 if it's possible for you.

flakpyro

@dinhngtu The output of that command seems to result in the output of "Scanningn every UUID in my pool", most of which do not use SB. Im guessing that normal and i do not have any affected VMs any longer?

acebmxer

I opened a support ticket #7746470

I get the following from different host...

Pool1 Master host:
[09:48 xcp-ng-vyadytkn ~]# xe vm-list --minimal | xargs -d, -Ix sh -c "echo Scanning x 1>&2; varstore-ls x" > /dev/null
Scanning ab9e8cde-fad8-5089-29c8-c904a810857a
Scanning d2025b59-6268-6bb9-28cd-e4812395563c
Scanning 4567b8da-3a3c-00a4-cf6b-ccdae302a645
Scanning 291f9d05-88c8-fc37-107a-368a55c649be
Scanning 88d7ba09-e65a-dd82-8d45-ec3df3e3f9d4
Scanning bcc182c6-dbb7-33c4-3e8b-c7db9b246e7b
Scanning 5a2c18ca-e9ce-abfc-8bd7-2794f94c6c3a
Scanning f4a4669a-2baf-47f2-b16a-08f60963e922
Scanning d4352870-d73c-5cda-9470-ffd7cd01e251
Scanning b0c21701-7309-dd9c-fa2a-bdc84a24565e
Scanning 342b470e-fac9-6579-f82d-2517b8de6112
Scanning 2c21c005-9230-f3f3-cdf6-2d39407b3456
Scanning 102a5ac2-ab7f-68ca-9fa1-b549d64ec4a9
Scanning c9dadc90-6fb8-eee7-d3e5-e1ae1024a77f
Scanning 5703adef-d804-6b15-ba2f-7b3357a711bb
Scanning a8858f86-ceab-2d5d-5d46-1b083c3fa399
Scanning 82b191df-a63c-4357-b618-4467f714008a

Pool 2 Master host (Problem VM)

[10:02 localhost ~]# xe vm-list --minimal | xargs -d, -Ix sh -c "echo Scanning x 1>&2; varstore-ls x" > /dev/null
Scanning ece6db75-533b-5359-1a99-28d5dc1a6912
Scanning c81f1f1b-9f95-38ec-f96e-5ce8fea073e6
unserialize_variables: Tolerating oversized data 60440 > 57344
Scanning 4fb6dee8-c251-93e6-0c20-b1c1c67351ba
Scanning 8a570993-6522-c837-0931-6fd1812dbd96
Scanning b31749b8-bc1a-0e8a-a864-50a06391592e
Scanning bf1b61d5-14ca-9f0e-7040-24c177693cea
Scanning af6eeff7-5640-28a9-dbdb-87f094a04665
Scanning 43ba924b-8bf7-4a50-b258-2e977f6f2f0c
Scanning 5a625c92-3702-2ce6-1790-39497745e83c
Scanning 9f36a8c5-c988-8546-b0f9-30ac9d0a5015
Scanning a7f5b1bb-7fe2-d0b5-5187-f29e5d4d15d7

Greg_E

My production pool upgraded fine as far as I can tell, but not so good with the windows drivers, I'll make a thread on the drivers.

dinhngtu

@flakpyro said in XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing:

@dinhngtu The output of that command seems to result in the output of "Scanningn every UUID in my pool", most of which do not use SB. Im guessing that normal and i do not have any affected VMs any longer?

Yes, it'll produce an error message in unserialize_variables when there's a problem.

@acebmxer Scanning on 1 host will scan the whole pool at once.

In the output you posted, there's only c81f1f1b-9f95-38ec-f96e-5ce8fea073e6 which needs fixing.