@ronan-a
[...]
64 bytes from 172.27.18.161: icmp_seq=21668 ttl=64 time=0.805 ms
64 bytes from 172.27.18.161: icmp_seq=21669 ttl=64 time=0.737 ms
64 bytes from 172.27.18.161: icmp_seq=21670 ttl=64 time=0.750 ms
64 bytes from 172.27.18.161: icmp_seq=21671 ttl=64 time=0.780 ms
64 bytes from 172.27.18.161: icmp_seq=21672 ttl=64 time=0.774 ms
64 bytes from 172.27.18.161: icmp_seq=21673 ttl=64 time=0.737 ms
64 bytes from 172.27.18.161: icmp_seq=21674 ttl=64 time=0.773 ms
64 bytes from 172.27.18.161: icmp_seq=21675 ttl=64 time=0.835 ms
64 bytes from 172.27.18.161: icmp_seq=21676 ttl=64 time=0.755 ms
1004711/1004716 packets, 0% loss, min/avg/ewma/max = 0.712/1.033/0.775/195.781 ms
I am attaching simple ping stats for last 11 days. I don't think we can blame the network