• Tesco and XCP-ng

    News
    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    99 Views
    P
    @john.c yeah i'm assuming the 40K is probably VMs, so better density of physical servers anyway, big players...
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    43 Views
    bleaderB
    @AlexanderK you could try to install perl-interpreter manually maybe? I happened to have a test host at hand that hasn't been updated since december, and the yum update went fine, perl interpreter was not installed before and yum update did install it on its own as a depency for openssl 3. Maybe others will have ideas as to why this would happen in your case.
  • XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Pinned News
    601
    1 Votes
    601 Posts
    309k Views
    A
    @rzr Again, installed on several active pools. Running correctly for my use.
  • TrueNAS VM failing to start

    Compute
    24
    0 Votes
    24 Posts
    2k Views
    E
    @tuxen Doing some research, it doesn't look like the Xeon's I have are affected. But I'm willing to try the next time I need to reboot. Will report back after that.
  • Slow boot on rocky linux 10 latest kernel

    Compute
    25
    2
    0 Votes
    25 Posts
    999 Views
    henri9813H
    Hello, Thanks for all !
  • 0 Votes
    28 Posts
    4k Views
    jgraftonJ
    @laszlobortel Hehe yeah, those are pretty old kernels. I'd say there's a good chance kernel upgrades will go a long way to alleviating the CPU hangs. I can't say it's exclusively a problem with lvmohba storage, that's just what we use because of our previous VMware infrastructure was block storage over fiber channel. We knew a physical infra overhaul wasn't in the cards for us for this migration so we stayed with our existing storage system. This bug bit us half way through the migration until we figured out upgrading the kernel generally fixed it.
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    168 Views
    M
    @psafont Thanks for the quick response and clarification. I appreciate you opening a work item for this. Looking forward to seeing this improvement in a future release.
  • 0 Votes
    33 Posts
    28k Views
    S
    For people running XCP-ng, wanting to use NUT client to power down gracefully during longer power outages, it could be interesting to note that Unifi now has two very affordable UPS models that feature a built in NUT server. So no need to run your own NUT server.
  • Slow response between XCP-NG and cloud stack syncing

    Compute
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    88 Views
    olivierlambertO
    Hi, XCP-ng got an event system that will propagate things like this instantly, at least that's the way it works normally Do you have the same behaviour in Xen Orchestra? Have you reported the issue to CloudStack? If you have an XCP-ng support subscription, you can also open a ticket so we can take a look on XCP-ng status to catch any obvious issue.
  • XO Backup Error: VDI_IN_USE(OpaqueRef:.., destroy)

    Backup
    16
    2
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    618 Views
    itservicesI
    Quick Update: Was looking good with commit cf26d. After the transfer completed the VDI of that particular VM was still in use, according to XO. So still failure on the job. Regards, Marc
  • Xen 8.2 isos

    Off topic
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    64 Views
    TeddyAstieT
    @TrapoSAMA https://updates.xcp-ng.org/isos/8.2/ And https://updates.xcp-ng.org/8/8.2/ appears fine.
  • XO Lite - network management "coming soon"

    XO Lite
    6
    1
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    811 Views
    olivierlambertO
    The same as @john.c and also XO Lite tends to be less a priority because less critical than the full fledged XO (the priority is to replace entirely XO 5 in the next releases). Why you would need XO Lite outside basic actions? It's mostly meant to bootstrap XO itself and do basic operations (which is already the case, at least with many basic features already). Initially, the goal hasn't moved: replacing XenCenter. We are moving in that direction, but again, I think it's more important to get XO 6 finished first. I'm curious to understand more the use case of XO Lite in your context @unreal-shizzle ?
  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    701 Views
    TeddyAstieT
    The rule is oddly written, and may conflict with another similar one that already exist in the distro (hence may not be useful to begin with). The modern generic rule for doing vCPU hotplug is, which would be preferable to the current z10-xen-vcpu-hotplug.rules. ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="cpu", ATTR{online}=="0", ATTR{online}="1"
  • unacceptable message conflict

    Backup
    8
    3
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    270 Views
    S
    @pierrebrunet ticket created https://help.vates.tech/#ticket/zoom/59723
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    136 Views
    poddingueP
    Good to hear, thanks a lot for your feedback.
  • Potential bug with Windows VM backup: "Body Timeout Error"

    Backup
    62
    3
    2 Votes
    62 Posts
    11k Views
    nikadeN
    @poddingue My colleage managed to workaround the issue by re-installing the lab on other hardware, I think it is now Cisco UCS-servers. It was HP ProLiant-servers before. Maybe it was an issue with some of the NIC or firmware, im not really sure, but it works now.
  • Need FeedBack: New version of the File level restore

    Pinned Backup
    12
    2 Votes
    12 Posts
    492 Views
    florentF
    the new code is now in master
  • Unable to create XOSTOR volume

    XOSTOR
    9
    1 Votes
    9 Posts
    631 Views
    poddingueP
    Thanks for coming back to close it out. That's useful to know. So I was plenty wrong, as it was the XOSTOR licensing backend rather than the repo side I guessed at; those -32000 errors really don't give much away. For anyone landing here later: sounds like -32000 on XOSTOR creation can come from either end, a licensing/entitlement issue that support sorts, or a host not reaching the package repo, so both are worth checking. @alcoralcor, did support get yours sorted too, or is yours still the repodata / repo-reachability one? Glad you're unblocked either way.
  • Replication is leaving VDIs attached to Control Domain, again

    Backup
    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    836 Views
    A
    @poddingue Since setting NBD=1, I have not seen the problem. SR is NFS on dual 40G ethernet with a TrueNAS scale 25.10 server using all NVMe SSD, so storage performance is as good as I can make it. I'll have to enable NBD=2 again to see if it still happens and if I can find the relevant part of the logs. As this is a random problem I can't recreate it on a normal test environment.
  • Ghost PCI device - how to remove?

    Hardware
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    151 Views
    poddingueP
    That leftover NIC is probably a stale PIF that XAPI is still holding, even though the card is physically gone, and the Refresh button re-scans rather than removing it. The docs have proper "remove a physical NIC" steps that end in forgetting the old PIF with xe pif-forget: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/networking/#remove-a-physical-nic. For the GPU side, the PCI passthrough flow (hiding the device from dom0, then assigning it) is here: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/compute#detaching-a-pci-device. If the GPU still won't show up as assignable once the stale PIF is gone, it might be worth a mention to @Team-Hypervisor-Kernel.