@ufm Thanks for the report. With the current implementation, it seems to be normal. Could you show me where it says that in the documentation and we'll discuss with the team whether it should be changed or not. Thanks!

@samuelolavo Yes, I do use NUT, but I don’t want to install any additional packet on XCP-ng. The way I found leverage the SSH authorized keys restrictions, and so you only need to change one file. Thanks for the link anyway

I had the same question but the responses here was amazing and the following blogpost nailed it. I hope it helps someone else too: https://techdirectarchive.com/2026/01/25/a-z-of-xcp-ng-and-xen-orchestra-setup-and-vm-creation/

@stormi Thanks, that sounds great! If there is something I can test / provide please let me know!

@LoTus111 Hello, I attempted to reproduce the issue without success. Could you please share the logs with us so we can conduct a deeper investigation? Feel free to send them to me via PM.

I managed to do the migration by splitting over the two storages the remove system has. This made it work and I managed to move that one VM. However I still have a second one It's thick provisioned (LVM - never can remember the terms thin/thick). Offline isn't an option unfortunately since I need the services running, can't take if off for 15 hours. But since two of the services are docker containers, both having a separate disk of 500GB, I can make it work by setting up a two new systems and moving everything from the container there. Which would reduce the size by 1TB and make thing easier to manage. Was hoping I could finally upgrade the main xcp-ng last weekend.

You must select a template, you can configure everything after (as @pilow said). It's meant to have some low level specifics you don't want to learn (BIOS/UEFI mode, some virt modes etc.)

I just released 0.0.3 https://github.com/benapetr/XenAdminQt/releases/tag/v0.0.3-alpha it brings it even closer to the original client, with packages for macos, debian12, debian13, ubuntu 22, ubuntu 24, Fedora 43, windows

Hi, Have you followed https://help.vates.tech/kb/en-us/8-technical-support/15-open-a-support-ticket ?

Hmm that's interesting. I suppose you can remove it via xe CLI, but XO shouldn't prevent you to remove it. Let me ping @Team-XAPI-Network for the xe command to remove this parameter, and ping @bastien-nollet to see how we could get rid of this limitation that blocks removing bogus devices.

Worth asking @Team-OS-Platform-Release

@dinhngtu said in Execute pre-freeze and post-thaw: There used to be quiescent snapshot capabilities in older versions (mainly for Windows VSS support), but it has since been removed. I'd say @Team-XAPI-Network knows more about the reason. We have vmware with ppdm backups and the vss part is actually causing some annoying issues such as quite long io stalls. But I do understand the reason for vss, especially for applications that aren't crash safe.

@tsukraw Your best option is to open a support ticket so that we can assist you on updating the XOA registration.

Nice find! Is there's any plan for Debian to backport that patch?

@florent increasing the timeout value was the solution. Thank you.

@florent said in Problems import vm Vmware to Xcp-ng from import Vmware and OVA: @olivluca skip ssl check in the import form I already did that. In fact it connects and I can get a list of VMs to import.

Does it work as you wanted now? If yes, probably something we can put in our official doc! Ping @thomas-dkmt

Indeed, it's hosted in Lyon, so an issue could happen in many places in the middle ^^

@florent I think you meant it was locking the xoa via .tar.gz but not via .zip which seemed to be the case Yeah I just decompressed the restored .zip and checked number of files and size via ncdu, result: "Total disk usage: 194,5 MiB Apparent size: 193,1 MiB Items: 613" In case I can provide more information for investigating this issue, please let me know. Thanks and best regards