@henri9813 Hi, There should be a new "reclaimSpace" in next release which help you to clean repositories. Just to let you know, we prefer to not remove orphan backups in case a VM removal is accidental and you want to bring back it from a backup repository

@carloum70 I can't really help you with anything specific but I must make a note that when analyzing network setup you must also take into account the Open vSwitch. Looking at the classic Linux networking, bridging and routing facilities is not enough to get you the full picture. For example, if I remember correctly, Active-Active bonding (non LACP) is implemented by Open vSwitch with so called balance-slb mode. This mode is not available with classic Linux kernel bonding options. What you are seeing (duplicated IPs) is maybe perfectly normal for this kind of setup with Open vSwitch. I would search for the cause of the issue somewhere else like network congestion. Heart beats are very sensitive to network congestion and can easily fail if you do not dedicate network links for this kind of traffic. If you are sharing the links over which heart beats are sent with some high traffic stuff (storage maybe?), it can easily make problems. UPDATE: unfortunately I don't have access to these kind of bonded setups any more so I can't check if the configuration differs in any way from yours. My home lab thingies are single network interface only.

@poddingue Turns out it is all secondary-to-secondary out of sync. So that makes it less intense, though if primary dies I wonder how it will resolve this, or if it will become split brained. Still unsure of how it happened, but the ones I manually cleaned up have not come back. Going to continue to manually clear them up. If it happens again I will have an alert setup to notify me, and I have all the xcp-ng logs and everything to be able to see what happened. If that happens I will post here with details and logs for the resource so we can see how it occurs. [image: image.jpeg]

@ronan-a For testing purposes, I did the following: I created a VM on the local SR of a host, installed Linux on it, and configured an ISCSI target. I then added that ISCSI target as an ISCSI SR within xcp-ng pool, and created a small VM on that repository, using XO. While the machine was running, I performed a migration without losing a single ping.I assume this confirms my previous assertion regarding the use of a standard storage system.

Thanks, @Jonathon !

@poddingue Thanks for taking a look. Yes it is this part that tells me that it should start the VM automatically once the import has completed. "After the transfer, the VM on XCP-ng side is started:" Followed by, "This process is fully automated, without any human intervention after it starts on step 1." [image: image.jpeg] https://docs.xcp-ng.org/installation/migrate-to-xcp-ng/ But my findings/experience is that the VM does not start once the import/transfer has completed. So either the docs are wrong. Or the function is not behaving as intended. I'm acctually fine either way. As long as I know what to expect. However, I would like to have it auto-start the VMs after transfer completion. Which would make the procedure "Fully automated". Update: Am I assuming correctly that "the XO V2V guide says to start the VM yourself once the migration is complete " you're reffering to, is part of the "test migration"-procedure? Not the acctual production mgiration? Because: "Final migration Run the production migration When you're ready for the final migration: Shut down the source VM completely. Start the V2V migration in Xen Orchestra with the Stop source option enabled. This ensures the final sync happens while the VM is powered off, and prevents any inconsistencies." In my mind doesn't state that the VM should be started manually post-transfer. Great thanks in advance for discussing! Cheers!

@Kajetan321 Hi, sorry. I am away from office and I can't tell you that off the top of my head right now. I get back to you during the week.

I wasn't even aware about this being a Windows limitation by itself

Wonderful !

@fohdeesha Hi all, I apologize that it's taken a while to get all the issues sorted, fixed and properly verified. I have pushed the corrected version up to my GitHub, and everything seems to be working much better (thanks to the efforts of everyone here)! A big shout out to all of you, as this is exactly how open source is supposed to work! Let me know if there are any other issues that arrise - and Happy Day to one and All!

@jerry1333 @poddingue First of all, XO and XCP-ng are running very well on all hosts and VMs, and I am using XO-5 without any issues. I have been noticing the same exact issue jerry1333 had, or may still have, with an annoying message that appears just after 30 seconds of connecting to the Xen Orchestra version 6 initial home screen with a Chrome browser (version 153) on my Windows 11 PC. In the past, the error message at the top of the window used to cycle on and off, over and over every 30 seconds. Now, if I don't click on "Retry", the "Unable to connect" message remains indefinitely. Xen Orchestra is up to date: Master, commit fc571 [image: image.jpeg] I consider this to be a mere annoyance, but if I am the only one experiencing this, perhaps someone can give me a suggestion on where to look for a solution. Thank you.

I ran into the same problem with DR replicas. Ignoring VMs by tag would solve the problem, but so would excluding the ip address information.

@samuelolavo Hello, Could the fact that this is a local LVM SR on a non-master host be relevant to how make_chain_rw is being handled? Yes, it's indeed what's happening. The check for the SRMaster (for a shared SR it's the master but for a local it's supposed to be done on the host directly) is failing and always saying False. I'll fix this. Thank you for the help

@JamesG, Yea i ended up having to go with a bare metal ubuntu install + docker containers for everything and have been off to the races, I would still like a hypervisor but unfortunately had to move on. The software stack on these intel's gpus is still maturing but i'm running some pretty impressive models on them and for the money it has been a good investment, hopefully these will gain some popularity and get better support all around. GPU hosting definitely deserves some attention from xcpng. I would buy some licenses for some production use cases but things like this and nested virtualization (completely unrelated but also something i ran into this past week) needs attention.

Just recieved another update from veeam... Regarding the general earlier errors: Warning : Failed to use CBT: [Task e75c4247-2ee1-7b51-088c-b970ace60f3d (Async.VDI.list_changed_blocks) failed: . SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_460. . Failed to calculate changed blocks for given VDIs. [opterr=Source and target VDI are unrelated] Our QA team did hear back from Vates support, who says its tied to a recent bug they've found with blktap calls: https://github.com/xapi-project/blktap/pull/444 Our QA engineer hasn't heard back yet on ETA when it will be pushed out in a general release yet though

@poddingue Thank you!!!