• 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    41 Views
    florentF
    @Pilow said: (file:///usr/local/lib/node_modules/@x fix is here https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/9667 fbeauchamp opened this pull request in vatesfr/xen-orchestra open fix(backups): schedule reference is missing #9667
  • Restore only showing 1 VM

    Backup
    8
    1
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    55 Views
    P
    @Bastien-Nollet I don't know, played around with it a little bit, all seemed to work, so I updated to master a6c50 as @acebmxer did and it still seems OK, so maybe we can put this on hold for now and put the energy on something else
  • VM Migration | PIF is not attached

    Compute
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    22 Views
    P
    had the same on one pool that needed 97 updates. RPU was going great, but couldn't migrate VM post-upgrade it is a pool of 2 hosts, second hosts still had 97 patches to pass... even if RPU was finished. we waited 10 min and the 97 patches disappeared, and then we could migrate the VM
  • Comparison with Ceph

    XOSTOR
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    39 Views
    olivierlambertO
    Different use cases: Ceph is better with more hosts (at least 6 or 7 minimum) while XOSTOR is better between 3 to 7/8. We might have better Ceph support in the future for large clusters.
  • Axios NPM attack

    Xen Orchestra
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    58 Views
    olivierlambertO
    I think I added it after the video ^^ (between the recording and the official release)
  • OIDC login - Internal Server Error

    Advanced features
    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    305 Views
    P
    @dlgroep Thank you, we will take thin/thick token into account and use 'claims' part for other properties.
  • XCP-NG upgrade 8.2 to 8.3

    XCP-ng
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    65 Views
    R
    To add a bit more detail on the upgrade path: strictly speaking, you do not need to apply outstanding 8.2 patches before upgrading. When you upgrade to 8.3, you are replacing the entire base system with the 8.3 release which already incorporates everything from the 8.2 patch stream. Any 8.2 patches you hadn't yet applied will simply be superseded. That said, applying them first is still a reasonable approach if you want a clean upgrade history and a fully-patched 8.2 baseline before jumping to 8.3. A few things worth checking before you start on a production pool: Check VM compatibility. Run a quick review of your VMs for any that might have specific OS or toolstack dependencies tied to 8.2. Most guests upgrade cleanly but it is worth knowing your environment. Use rolling pool upgrade if you have more than one host. XCP-ng supports rolling upgrades: you migrate VMs off each host, upgrade it, rejoin the pool, then proceed to the next. This maintains VM availability throughout the process. The XO interface handles this workflow if you have XOA. Back up before the jump. Export critical VM configurations or snapshots beforehand. If you use Xen Orchestra for backups, trigger a manual full backup job before starting. The upgrade itself via yum is straightforward: add the 8.3 repo, yum update, reboot. The toolstack and XAPI will handle pool registration after the host comes back up. After upgrading all hosts, run the post-upgrade checks from the docs (pool metadata sync, storage rescans) and verify HA is healthy if you use it.
  • 1 Votes
    3 Posts
    76 Views
    B
    @AtaxyaNetwork Merci becuoup pour ce retour. Je vais compléter l'article dans ce sens.
  • Loss of connection during an action BUG

    Xen Orchestra
    18
    3
    0 Votes
    18 Posts
    241 Views
    P
    @User-cxs peut etre un clnflit IP ou la VM prenait l'IP du master... courage pour la suite !
  • HOST_NOT_ENOUGH_FREE_MEMORY

    Xen Orchestra
    6
    5
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    195 Views
    U
    @Danp Okay thanks you
  • Backup Info under VM tab in v6 never loads...

    Backup
    64
    2
    0 Votes
    64 Posts
    463 Views
    A
    @MathieuRA said: @ph7 @acebmxer Hi, regarding your backups which do not appear on the XO5 restore page, I suggest you to open a new topic so that this one remains focused on XO6 dashboards Once I updated back to master are restore points are visible again. Issue only appears with this test branch.
  • Timestamp lost in Continuous Replication

    Backup
    27
    2
    0 Votes
    27 Posts
    772 Views
    florentF
    @joeymorin said: I observed similar behaviour. Two pools. Pool A composed of two hosts. Pool B is single-host. B runs a VM with XO from source. Two VMs on host A1 (on local SR), one VM on host B1 A2 (on local SR). Host A2 has a second local SR (separate physical disc) used as the target for a CR job. CR job would back up all four VMs to the second local SR on host A2. The behaviour observed was that, although the VM on B would be backed up (as expected) as a single VM with multiple snapshots (up to the 'replication retention'), the three other VMs on the same pool as the target SR would see a new full VM created for each run of the CR job. That rather quickly filled up the target SR. I noticed the situation was corrected by a commit on or about the same date reported by @ph7. Incidentally, whatever broke this, and subsequently corrected it, appears to have corrected another issue I reported here. I never got a satisfactory answer regarding that question. Questions were raised about the stability of my test environment, even though I could easily reproduce it with a completely fresh install. Thanks for the work! edit: Correction B1 A2 sometimes it's hard to find a n complete explanation without connecting to the hosts and xo, and going through a lot of logs , which is out of the scope of community support I am glad the continuous improvement of the code base fixed the issue . We will release today a new patch, because migrating from 6.2.2 to 6.3 for a full replication ( source user that updated to the intermediate version are not affected )
  • Every VM in a CR backup job creates an "Unhealthy VDI"

    Backup
    20
    1
    0 Votes
    20 Posts
    1k Views
    J
    This issue appears to have been resolved by a recent change.
  • fell back to full and cannot delete snapshot

    Backup
    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    25 Views
    No one has replied
  • Unable to copy template

    Management
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    161 Views
    Tristis OrisT
    While I was updating all the pools, a micro-update for 5 packages was released again. They come out every week now. Same issue with basic migration. Now it impossible.
  • Backing up from Replica triggers full backup

    Backup
    14
    6
    1 Votes
    14 Posts
    248 Views
    florentF
    @Pilow open a dedicated topic on this . I will ping the relevant team there is it iscsi + CBT ?
  • How to Setup IPMI in XO

    Management
    30
    0 Votes
    30 Posts
    2k Views
    A
    Come on everyone! Click Here to vote to support HP IPMI info in XO!
  • backup mail report says INTERRUPTED but it's not ?

    Backup
    119
    5
    0 Votes
    119 Posts
    8k Views
    florentF
    yes, the last changes are released in latest ( 6.3) tomorrow if everything proceed as intended mostly : https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/9622 https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/9557 and this one was in 6.2 : https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/commit/e36e1012e20c9678efa15148179941cb284c39a6 that's nice to hear fbeauchamp opened this pull request in vatesfr/xen-orchestra closed feat(xo-server): use index for getAllUnhealthyVdiChainsLength #9622 fbeauchamp opened this pull request in vatesfr/xen-orchestra closed fix(backups): better handling of generator cleanup #9557 0 fbeauchamp committed to vatesfr/xen-orchestra fix(xo-web): reducing polling for patches and license
  • 🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!

    Pinned Xen Orchestra
    169
    7 Votes
    169 Posts
    18k Views
    S
    @AlexanderK xo 6 is rolling out features regularly, for many functions, you must continue to use x05. backup is one of those at this time
  • ACL V2 is coming soon and we need your feedbacks!

    Xen Orchestra
    1
    4 Votes
    1 Posts
    87 Views
    No one has replied