@AshleyDe It was exactly that, but complicated by the abandoned status of the fuse-native module being used for XOA in 2023. That module contained binary blobs, but unfortunately no binary for aarch64. Being abandoned meant getting aarch64 into that module was not possible. My horrible bodge was to swap to an alternative module for fuse-native that built from source. Thus it avoided the missing aarch64 blob, but required additional dependancies for the compile to work. I'm no longer using XOA on the aarch64 platform in my home lab so I haven't kept up to date on whether this is still needed in 2026.

If you're looking for a quick way to verify those files without running a full restoration test every single time, you can usually run a checksum comparison (MD5 or SHA256) against the original data. For a more 'point and click' approach to double-check specific files or verify hashes quickly, I've used https://thetoolapp.com/utilities/file-integrity-checker/ before. It’s pretty handy for a quick integrity check if you aren't in the mood to mess around with the command line for every single backup set.

Hello @tsukraw , normally your client should be able to bind the new license on their XOA. BTW, you talk about binding the license to a pool but an XOA license is bound to an XOA. I suggest your customer open a support ticket so we can help them with that issue.

For my reference later. wget http://downloads.hpe.com/pub/softlib2/software1/pubsw-linux/p1257348637/v76502/hpacucli-9.20-9.0.x86_64.rpm yum install -y --nogpgcheck hpacucli-9.20-9.0.x86_64.rpm hpacucli controller slot=0 physicaldrive all show

Hi @Pilow, Thanks for the report. We are aware that there are many problems with the FLR. We would like to fix them but they are not easy to fix, and we can't give an estimation date for a fix. I've linked this topic to our investigation ticket. For the moment, when FLR fails, we recommend to manually restore your files by following this documentation: https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/blob/master/%40vates/fuse-vhd/README.md#restore-a-file-from-a-vhd-using-fuse-vhd-cli

@flakpyro Hi, I am looking into it.

@jerry1333 nothing obvious.. except for NETDATA popping on your host [image: 1775539979730-7a0648b8-058a-4b28-8a8e-b7f0b47fff75-image.jpeg] did you enable advanced telemetry ? could be it

@benapetr configure dhcp\static mode.

Replying to an old thread because this one popped up in a search. There is an open source and locally running ignition/combustion generator that I've used on bare metal. To use it with XCP-ng, we would need the ability to have a second "cd rom" drive during the install phase, one for the OS installer, one for the combustion/ignition ISO generated from the tool. https://opensuse.github.io/fuel-ignition/ They say it only runs locally, no info is send out to the web. I didn't monitor my connection on the one time I used it, and probably won't the next time (coming soon to a bare metal cluster in my lab). For the record, I'm using the LEAP version of Micro for my tasks.

@TheNorthernLight Thanks for pointing that out, that totally makes sense, I should have realized to look it up that way. I guess I just think of XCP-ng as its own product so much that I forget it's based on Xen even though I know that.

Ping @Team-XO-Backend

@DustinB thank you! I suspected as much, but as my wife points out all the time, I am terrible at finding things, so I figured I would ask.

Still working fine But after this work You put in it seems like VDI-size in VMs VDIS is back to showing size of snapshot instead of size of VM. I'l update the XO6 thread https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/11604/xo-6-dedicated-thread-for-all-your-feedback/169

@geometry game 2 This usually happens when dependencies are out of sync after pulling updates. Did you try removing node_modules and the lock file and then running yarn install again before starting XO?

@simonp - Can you reshare the dashboards. The link says json is not available for any of these dashboards,

La remarque a été intégrée dans l'article: https://www.myprivatelab.tech/xcp_lab_v2_ha#perte-master Merci encore pour le retour.

I've seen this happen after a BIOS update or if a CMOS battery starts failing. Sometimes the motherboard resets to 'Legacy' instead of 'UEFI' (or vice versa), and GRUB just loses its mind because it can't find the partition it expects. It’s worth a quick check in your firmware settings to make sure the boot mode and the drive order haven't shifted on you.

Support tunnel is active but I have troubles to access support "Oops, something went wrong! Don't worry, our team is already on it". I'll keep trying, thanks.

That is a frustrating loop to be in, especially with TrueNAS. Usually, when the VM fails to start after a change, it’s because XCP-ng is trying to pass through a PCI device (like an HBA) that isn't being released properly by the host. Have you checked if the "hide" parameters in your grub config are still correct? Sometimes an update can reset those, and the host grabs the controller before the VM can. Another thing to try is toggling the BIOS/UEFI mode in the VM settings - TrueNAS can be picky about that depending on which version you’re running.