Node v24 should work fine. The reason for your failure is here -- error eslint-visitor-keys@5.0.1: The engine "node" is incompatible with this module. Expected version "^20.19.0 || ^22.13.0 || >=24". Got "23.11.0" Either upgrade Node to v24 or downgrade it to v22.

@Pilow Yes NFS on vm storage and on backup storage. All vms are now on qcow2 except for the windows vm what was vhd. However i just mirgrated it over to qcow2. the Nics in all systems are the intel 10gb either x520 or x540

@abudef I don't know. I forwarded the question.

@MajorP93 I am not sure of which branch. can you switch to https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/9725 then when running this branch : wait for the memory to fill find the process running xo ( dist/cli.mjs ) send signal : kill -SIGUSR2 a file is created in `/tmp/xo-server-${process.pid}-${Date.now()}.heapsnapshot` Note that these exports can contain sensitive data. This will freeze you xo from a few seconds to 2 minutes, and the memory consumption after will be higher after, but this will be very usefull to identify exactly what is leaking The file will be a few hundred MB fbeauchamp opened this pull request in vatesfr/xen-orchestra open Fix(xo-server): TLSSocket memory leak — stoppable + http-server-plus incompatibility #9725

@ataxyanetwork I managed to install XOA (Current version: 6.2.2 - XOA build: 20251219) and did some more testing. I am experiencing the same issue when trying to restore from an existing backup. When I create a new backup job, I can perform a filelevel restore without any problems. However, when I rerun the job, I am no longer able to restore from the most recent backup. It only works with the initial backup. Can you also reproduce this ?

@McHenry said: Thanks. The old snapshots are being removed as the total never increases beyond 16, so when a new snapshot is added, the old one is removed. immediatly removed, yes, but then Garbage collection takes place. and perhaps with 19x16 GC to process it can't be done in one hour, and then next CR is launched, etc etc...

@Bytevenidos That's an interesting way of doing this, I'll have to remember it. I think the Fuel Ignition tool has a vhd output, it also produces both ignition and combustion parts for you. Worked pretty good on one test machine, but I need to go deeper into some of the other choices you can type in.

Hello @MathieuRA , @florent Moving the discussion to this thread as it seems to be tackling the same issue: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/11892/xoa-memory-usage/28?_=1776334896974 I reported my findings so far over there Best regards

Thank you so much for your feedback, @Vagrantin !

@denis.grilli The problem is not the performance of the scan ... the problem is, that this storage device only consists of block devices (disks) that should go into standby mode when not used ... but I think I've found a code line that checks if other-config for an SR contains auto-scan: false... I think ...

@yannsionneau Thanks for the update! We are eagerly awaiting your findings! Thanks for looking into it.

@Pilow Thanks for the heads-up, you should be able to add back concurrency as it was before and get similar performance to before the refactoring.

Thank you for your feedback @kratos !

it's only possible to change management interface. [image: 1776174536719-d5cbdf34-9bd7-42fd-9866-6f7474550be7-image.jpeg] nothing can be done with other NICs. weird, what is this? [image: 1776174634577-5630d95a-79e5-421f-811c-1da5746b8812-image.jpeg]

@archw Could the results you are observing be due to the fact that some of the files weren't modified in the specific delta backup that you selected as your restore point? For example: In another subdirectory there are supposed to be 7 files but in the selection window there are only two. When were these 5 "missing" files last modified?

@Aleksander There are plenty of examples on this forum. We have used Nvidia T4, it works very well.

@anthoinebThe problem still persists; when can we expect it to be resolved?

perhaps "in the context of a proceeding RPU, do not start halted VMs" ? or "boot only halted VMs that have HA enabled" ? but I can imagine corner cases where this is not wanted. some chicken & egg problem.