Subcategories

  • All Xen related stuff

    624 Topics
    6k Posts
    poddingueP
    Rocky 10 is affected and has no fix in it. I pulled the source RPM for kernel-6.12.0-211.16.1.el10_2.0.1, which is your -211: jiffies.c still ends on core_initcall(init_jiffies_clocksource) with no cs_jiffies_registered, so f24df84cbe05 hasn't landed, and max_raw_delta sits in clocksource.h with nothing setting it early, so the regression is still there. So tsc_mode=2 and nomigrate stay the answer on Rocky until Red Hat picks it up. One more thing, because this thread reads like an AMD problem if you skim it. @dvinni measured the same stalled clock on Intel Xeon Gold in the sibling thread, and the upstream fix came from @teddyastie bisecting it on a Xen HVM guest. I read source rather than booting a Rocky VM, so if you have one behaving differently I'd like to hear it.
  • The integrated web UI to manage XCP-ng

    29 Topics
    367 Posts
    olivierlambertO
    The same as @john.c and also XO Lite tends to be less a priority because less critical than the full fledged XO (the priority is to replace entirely XO 5 in the next releases). Why you would need XO Lite outside basic actions? It's mostly meant to bootstrap XO itself and do basic operations (which is already the case, at least with many basic features already). Initially, the goal hasn't moved: replacing XenCenter. We are moving in that direction, but again, I think it's more important to get XO 6 finished first. I'm curious to understand more the use case of XO Lite in your context @unreal-shizzle ?
  • Section dedicated to migrations from VMWare, HyperV, Proxmox etc. to XCP-ng

    128 Topics
    1k Posts
    acebmxerA
    If i recall from my migration I belive thats all there is to it. I know the docs mention about doing a test migration but mine just migrated and it just worked as you stated after making the needed adjustments. Let other chime in but i think you are good to go. And you could delete the snapshot from the vm.
  • Hardware related section

    174 Topics
    2k Posts
    poddingueP
    @seanmcg182 's post might be the answer to the original question, two years late. Your lspci -s 0000:05:00.0 -v at post 8 shows (rev ff) and !!! Unknown header type 7f, which is the same pair he had, and in his case it came from bifurcating the wrong PCIe port in the BIOS rather than from anything XCP-ng was doing. He says the unknown header is what then produced the device or resource busy error on VM start, which is the error you opened with. I don't know whether your board exposes bifurcation the way his X10DRH-CT does, so it might not transfer at all. @kuznetcoff777 if that machine is still around, it'd be worth a look either way.
  • The place to discuss new additions into XCP-ng

    254 Topics
    3k Posts
    olivierlambertO
    It's more like "partially"/loosely based on Alma (10, not 9). And yes, the kernel will be far more recent, same for Xen and so on.
  • Smart Reboot blocked in XO, and no Rolling Pool Update

    Unsolved
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    280 Views
    D
    @poddingue said: What I can't tell you is what set that particular combination on your VM in the first place. Does it ring a bell? I have no Idea. I had it on "Protect from accidental shutdown" but turned that off again, later. Doing this again (on, off) helped, as you said. Thank you so much!
  • VM autostart stopped working

    Unsolved
    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    349 Views
    O
    @poddingue Thank you for the analysis. I'd give you a rep if I could
  • Sudden boot issues, emergency shell, root-lfgrma does not exist

    Solved boot dracut
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    59 Views
    S
    After a good sleep, I resolved half of my issue. I got my LSI Cards messed up, I accidentally hidan internal LSI3108 (Address 01:00.0) instead of the PCI Card LSI3008 (Address 05:00.0)... My Boot Drives run off of the internal card. From the fallback kernel, I was able to Modify /etc/grub-efi.cfg to remove the internal card form the hidden list. I now have a separate issue, but will make another post.
  • Autostart behaviour after upgrade 8.2 -> 8.3

    Solved
    6
    1
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    225 Views
    poddingueP
    I put both of your questions on a spare host, because I couldn't answer either from memory. On colons: xe creates a key literally called auto_poweron:true with an empty value, so the entries you saw were three separate keys and none was the real auto_poweron, and typing false afterwards just made another one. It exits 0 and prints nothing every time, which I'd call a rough edge rather than a feature, though other-config is free-form by design so I don't know that the CLI is meant to validate keys at all. On the sleep: with rc.local executable and no sleep, it fired at 16 seconds of uptime and xe appliance-start came back with Error: Connection refused (calling connect ), exit 1, in under a tenth of a second. The VM stayed halted and nothing was reported anywhere, since rc.local has no terminal to print to. rc-local.service only orders after basic.target and network.target, nothing toolstack-related, while xapi-wait-init-complete.service took 30 seconds on that host, which is presumably why 60 was barely enough for you. There's an xapi-init-complete.target that looks like the right thing to order a unit against instead of guessing at a delay, though I haven't tried it so treat that as a lead rather than advice. The executable-bit half is in the docs now, it went onto the troubleshooting page after you reported it: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/troubleshooting/common-problems
  • 0 Votes
    5 Posts
    195 Views
    M
    Hard reboot sorted itself out
  • Get a price quote on a plan

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    106 Views
    DanpD
    Hi, I found your original request. I will make sure someone from the Sales team responds ASAP. Regards, Dan
  • CPU Usage of empty server

    Unsolved
    15
    3
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    1k Views
    marcoiM
    i think im seeing the same with fake cpu spikes. I started a second pool yesterday to patch and left it on over night. typically i just shut it down once done so the servers dont get too far behind patching. Under the pool stats im seeing spikes but under hosts nothing. It doesnt really bother me, but figure i add to the thread that im also seeing it. [image: 1784817154694-c75fecec-d618-4f05-a931-edea6bc6ecce-image-resized.jpeg] [image: 1784817189696-1b9ea5aa-d349-4ff8-af89-30a970d36fbb-image-resized.jpeg] [image: 1784817219194-0f579999-cd96-4216-a0d4-d637ea5febf1-image-resized.jpeg]
  • The Lowest Priority Bug Ever? (/etc/udev/rules.d/z10-xen-vcpu-hotplug.rules)

    Unsolved
    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    poddingueP
    Two PRs out of the lowest priority bug ever, that made my morning.
  • Unable to live migrate VM between 2 local storages SR

    Solved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    442 Views
    poddingueP
    I converted the topic to a question, then marked it solved. Thanks!
  • 0 Votes
    5 Posts
    726 Views
    gthvn1G
    PRs upstream are in review
  • Can't restart stopped VMs; unclear error message

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    772 Views
    acebmxerA
    @the_jest Not showen in this picutre but this is where the message would be displayed. Next to the name of the host... [image: 1782931263879-screenshot-2026-07-01-144023.png]
  • Start: no host available?

    9
    2
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    1k Views
    olivierlambertO
    For your storage question, it's fully explained in the doc: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/storage/#-how-to-modify-an-existing-sr-connection And yes, it's planned to get the complete error visible in XO, sadly, it's not "obvious" since the error message isn't returned by XAPI when you try to start but by another method we need to call after it fails ("assert can be started here" from the top of my head). Let me ping @julienXOvates
  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    1k Views
    N
    @Danp said: Smart Reboot option found on the host's Advanced tab does what you are asking Very nice!
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    389 Views
    bleaderB
    @AlexanderK you could try to install perl-interpreter manually maybe? I happened to have a test host at hand that hasn't been updated since december, and the yum update went fine, perl interpreter was not installed before and yum update did install it on its own as a depency for openssl 3. Maybe others will have ideas as to why this would happen in your case.
  • cifs-utils LPE (CVE-2026-46243) / 8.3 dom0 vulnerability inquiry

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    R
    Closing the loop on this one — VSA-2026-021 went up yesterday (June 10) covering CIFSwitch / CVE-2026-46243: https://docs.vates.tech/security/advisories/2026/vates-sa-2026-021 A few things worth flagging for anyone following along: Severity landed at Moderate 🟠 — same ballpark as CopyFail/DirtyFrag, as Lucien anticipated. XCP-ng 8.3 and XOA both confirmed affected. XCP-ng 8.3 fix isn't in the main repo yet. The advisory notes there's a publicly available package with the fix, but it's not in the standard channel — Vates is asking people to reach out for the install procedure so you don't break future Rolling Pool Updates. So don't go hand-rolling the kernel commit yourself if you want to stay on the RPU path. XOA is already handled — fixed in Debian kernel 6.1.174-1, pushed via the unattended update mechanism. Just note the XOA VM needs a restart for it to take effect, and anything older than Debian 11/12 won't get the update and needs an OS upgrade first. Mitigation is unchanged from what we discussed: blacklist the cifs module if you're not using SMB-based SRs (which breaks SMB SRs, so only if you don't rely on them). Good turnaround given the disclosure-to-advisory window. Thanks again @LucienLassalle and the security team.
  • Adding new host to pool fails - Stunnel SSL certiticate verification failure

    Solved
    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    2k Views
    LucienLassalleL
    @Bryanvh No problem The issue you encountered wasn't very clear. Therefore, I've proposed a change to the XAPI to make the error more explicit (this will likely be implemented in future XAPI releases). So instead of SSL Certification failure the message will be: POOL_JOINING_MASTER_CERTIFICATE_NOT_IN_POOL_BUNDLE. Thank you very much for your patience and for bringing this issue to our attention. References: https://github.com/xapi-project/xen-api/pull/7112
  • Ubuntu 24.04 VMs not reporting IP addresses to XCP-NG 8.2.1

    13
    5
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    6k Views
    olivierlambertO
    Because it works already better than the GO tool from Citrix… There's no urgent fix to do, I personally use it in my production since it's available. It's just less a priority for extra features because it's already ultra stable. Right now, we choose to work in priority on XCP-ng 9.0 than the Rust tools, we can't do everything at once yet.
  • [Solved] SR_SOURCE_SPACE_INSUFFICIENT - Problems enabling HA

    Solved
    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views
    J
    @olivierlambert Thanks again for your input and recomendations! I'll verify that this is solved by having the LUN expanded to 8GB instead. Afterwards I'll mark your answer as the solution!
  • Citrix or XCP-ng drivers for Windows Server 2022

    19
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    9k Views
    ForzaF
    @iams3le we have switched to the signed xcp-ng drivers. We also replaced our older 2022 servers.
  • xe-gues-utilities woes on openSUSE Leap 16

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    D
    @MajorP93 that’s fine - I never use ballooning anyway so I guess I am covered good