XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Andrew
    A
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 5
    • Topics 42
    • Posts 704
    • Groups 1

    Andrew

    @Andrew

    Top contributor
    564
    Reputation
    216
    Profile views
    704
    Posts
    5
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined
    Last Online
    Location Hartford, CT, USA

    Andrew Unfollow Follow
    Top contributor

    Best posts made by Andrew

    • RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing

      @stormi Microcode updated on affected Gen11 i7. Running normally.

      posted in News
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing

      @gduperrey I jumped in all the way by mistake... I updated a wrong host, so I just did them all. Older AMD, Intel E3/E5, NUC11, etc. So far, so good. Add/migrate/backup/etc VMs are working as usual. Good for guest tools too, but mine are mostly Debian 7-11. Stuff is as usual so far.

      posted in News
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: Can I just say thanks?

      I agree and I'll say it again, Thanks! It's not just Linux/Xen stuff. It is XCP-ng and XO that make everything work as a cohesive vertical open-source solution (some nice buzz words). Thanks to the Vates team and community that have built and support it. I look forward to ongoing continuous improvement and innovation!

      posted in Off topic
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing

      @bleader Installed and running.

      posted in News
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing

      @bleader Updates running on several old and new intel machines (including microcode update). Working fine so far. Rolling Pool Reboot is a helpful feature.

      posted in News
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing

      @bleader I installed it on a bunch of busy hosts. All are fine, but none used PCI passthrough. The Rolling Pool Reboot in XO was very helpful.

      posted in News
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: Windows 2025 Standard 24H2.11 (iso release of sept 25) crash on reboot with "INACCESSIBLE BOOT DEVICE 0x7B" in XCP 8.2.1 and XCP 8.3

      @dinhngtu On a quick test, the ISO boots and installs. When the VM boots from the HD it crashes (and on reboots).

      Updating XCP 8.3 with qemu-4.2.1-5.2.12.2~fixvwc1.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64 solves the issue and the installed windows image boots correctly without any additional changes.

      posted in XCP-ng
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: "Block migraton" option on the VM´s Advanced tab

      @abudef @olivierlambert @thomas-dkmt I agree. I read block the same way... how about disable or prevent. (French? empêcher)

      posted in Management
      A
      Andrew
    • Ability to delete XO task logs. Thanks!

      @julien-f @olivierlambert

      Thanks for the ability to delete XO task logs feature! (XO commit f6e6e)

      posted in Management
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      @gduperrey Installed and running on Intel systems, and Zen3 system that sees the microcode update.

      posted in News
      A
      Andrew

    Latest posts made by Andrew

    • RE: Old DELL 2950 with E5430@2.66GHz

      @whyberg Nope... that feature is part of the CPU. But is that the actual problem? Maybe... As that machine is too old to do any real work, it's a fine toy. There are better faster cheap test machines available.

      posted in Hardware
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: Replication is leaving VDIs attached to Control Domain, again

      @florent Delta backup is also leaving old snapshots on some VMs. It should only have one (current) snapshot for the nightly backup. This is an issue on 1 of 100 VMs.

      XCP (Jan 2026 update) and XO (91c5d) are current.

      30de9803-0b8d-488d-b160-57c623f66e78-image.png

      posted in Backup
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: Old DELL 2950 with E5430@2.66GHz

      @whyberg Normally not 10x...

      posted in Hardware
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: Old DELL 2950 with E5430@2.66GHz

      @whyberg The E5430 does not support EPT/SLAT.... without EPT the system uses shadow paging so virtual machines will be slower. Also, you can't run XCP 8.3.

      posted in Hardware
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: Replication is leaving VDIs attached to Control Domain, again

      @florent Yes.

      posted in Backup
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: Windows 11 (Win11_25H2_English_x64.iso) Fails to Install

      @busthead Try turning off Secure Boot.

      posted in XCP-ng
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: Replication is leaving VDIs attached to Control Domain, again

      @florent With CR running and NBD enabled for 2, I see both exports and one import (per disk). It's never the import that's stuck and only one (not both) of the exports (if it happens).

      I have updated XCP 8.3 to the new January 2026 patch and XO to current master and will keep an eye on it again.

      posted in Backup
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      @gduperrey Standard XCP 8.3 pools updated and running.

      posted in News
      A
      Andrew
    • RE: Replication is leaving VDIs attached to Control Domain, again

      @florent Different random ones.

      posted in Backup
      A
      Andrew
    • Replication is leaving VDIs attached to Control Domain, again

      Using updated XCP 8.3 and XO (current master 21767) Continuous Replication is sometimes (1%) leaving VDIs attached to Control Domain.... again. The backups and tasks do finish correctly.

      I don't know exactly when it started happening (may be around 8448b4d the 6.0 release, but not exactly that version) and it's not something that happens all the time. Sometimes once a day, other days several times.

      This problem was happening a long time again and then it was fixed in XO (a year ago) and everything was good. This may be a timing issue again that XO is just not finishing removing the attached VDI for backup (need longer waiting and retries?)

      I know it's not a lot of info. This is more of a "be on notice" that something is happening, maybe others have the same issue again.

      posted in Backup
      A
      Andrew