Subcategories

  • All Xen related stuff

    625 Topics
    6k Posts
    AtaxyaNetworkA
    Hello everyone ! I rebuild a new OME appliance with the latest version (4.7) What i did on the rebuild: Via live CD add xen-blkfront and xen-netfront driver, and rebuild the initrd change root password activate SSH. Via TUI Change admin password Set interface to DHCP Via SSH sed -i -e 's/sda/xvda/g' /opt/dell/omc/utilities/tui/bin/ome_disk_config.sh sed -i -e 's/sda/xvda/g' /opt/dell/mcsi/appliance/scripts/appliance_resources.sh bash /mnt/Linux/install.sh # To install XCP-ng tools As usual, please send a DM if you want the link to the VHD Also, if you want to build it yourself, the driver are here https://cecilemorange.fr/drivers/xen-netfront.ko https://cecilemorange.fr/drivers/xen-blkfront.ko Feedback is welcome ! (Disclamer: This build is something I create on my free time and to help people who have difficulty running Dell appliances on XCP-ng. I do not guarantee a fully functional appliance, but I do my best to make it work. If you have a support contract with Dell and require official support for OME, please contact Dell and request compatibility with XCP-ng.)
  • The integrated web UI to manage XCP-ng

    29 Topics
    367 Posts
    olivierlambertO
    The same as @john.c and also XO Lite tends to be less a priority because less critical than the full fledged XO (the priority is to replace entirely XO 5 in the next releases). Why you would need XO Lite outside basic actions? It's mostly meant to bootstrap XO itself and do basic operations (which is already the case, at least with many basic features already). Initially, the goal hasn't moved: replacing XenCenter. We are moving in that direction, but again, I think it's more important to get XO 6 finished first. I'm curious to understand more the use case of XO Lite in your context @unreal-shizzle ?
  • Section dedicated to migrations from VMWare, HyperV, Proxmox etc. to XCP-ng

    129 Topics
    1k Posts
    poddingueP
    Thanks, keep us posted!
  • Hardware related section

    176 Topics
    2k Posts
    No new posts.
  • The place to discuss new additions into XCP-ng

    255 Topics
    3k Posts
    dicode-nlD
    New version: https://github.com/dicode-nl/xcp-ng-ceph-rbd/releases/tag/v20260903 This one includes native Ceph rbd SXM over SMAPIv3! GitHub updated with the latest commits and changes. As always, use with caution. I did run a lot of test scenario's but please do test yourself and let me know your findings!
  • xe-gues-utilities woes on openSUSE Leap 16

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    D
    @MajorP93 that’s fine - I never use ballooning anyway so I guess I am covered good
  • 0 Votes
    21 Posts
    5k Views
    poddingueP
    The sr.scan-driven SMlog growth angle that gumbo2k surfaced is a real lead; there's some context in the storage-related log files reference, but the docs don't go as far as "here's how to throttle it safely on a pool where the underlying disks should spin down." Soft ping to @Team-Storage and @Team-Hypervisor-Kernel: could one of you weigh in on whether other-config:auto-scan=false on the SR is the supported way to reduce scan pressure, or if there's a better lever? I don't want to send anyone down a path that breaks an SR. Apologies if this has already been answered somewhere I haven't seen.
  • XOA vulnerabilty to "copy fail" and "dirty frag" bug

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    R
    Quick update now that Vates has published their official advisory. First, kudos to the Vates security team for the thorough and timely response. VSA-2026-014 is well-documented and covers the full picture, including a third CVE I had not covered in my earlier posts. VSA-2026-014 confirms what I outlined above: XCP-ng is affected by CVE-2026-43284 (XFRM-ESP) and is NOT affected by CVE-2026-43500 (no RxRPC support). The CVE I had missed: CVE-2026-46300 ("Fragnesia") also affects XCP-ng via the XFRM ESP-in-TCP subsystem. The same esp4/esp6 blacklist mitigation applies, with the same caveat @semarie raised: it will break encrypted private networks on XCP-ng. Now that the VSA and official mitigation guidance are public, I'm releasing the diagnostic script I built. It's Python 3.6, no external dependencies, safe to run on production dom0. It tests whether an unprivileged process can engage the esp4 engine via the XFRM interface inside a user namespace — without touching any exploit code. Since both CVE-2026-43284 and CVE-2026-46300 (Fragnesia) require esp4 or esp6 to be reachable from an unprivileged namespace, and share the same mitigation, a positive result confirms exposure to both. Blacklist esp4/esp6, then run the script again — ACCESS DENIED means both CVEs are mitigated. One important note before running it: please read the code before executing it on any of your systems. This is good practice with any script from the internet, regardless of the source. The code is intentionally short and straightforward so you can review it quickly and satisfy yourself that it does exactly what it says. VSA-2026-014: https://docs.vates.tech/security/advisories/2026/vates-sa-2026-014/ Diagnostic tool: https://github.com/grabesec/XCP_ng_CVE-2026-43284_tester A kernel patch from Vates is in progress. Apply as soon as it lands.
  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    I
    @yomeyo I had this also, but problem disappeared itself. https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/issues/793 [image: a3dcbb0b-fe7a-4389-addc-247190039a18]
  • Revert to snapshot, resets creation date. Intended behaviour?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    666 Views
    J
    @poddingue Thanks for your input. Yes I'm aware that basically everything on the VM is incorporated into the snapshot. Including settings and metadata. This is acctually why I was surprised that the creation date wasn't preserved as part of that metadata. And as you say, if one uses that metric to track VM history. Then it can, and will, throw you off. I'll gladly submit this as a feature request. But my gut feeling is that it is more akin to a bug than missing feature per se. Thanks!
  • Question about pools

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views
    P
    @vlamincktr XO PROXY from source is pretty reliable at no cost either use @acebmxer script or @ronivay here is a quick tuto on an ubuntu VM https://omnibox.huducloud.com/shared_article/QJ9y1bRSPj9VTbWp6NKaV7yn/installation-xoa-a-partir-des-sources-github-ronivay first part is XO CE, second part is XO PROXY CE beware as you delegate some jobs to XO PROXY, to ever upgrade XO PROXY when you upgrade XOA, so that they have the same backup mechanisms/code
  • [SOLVED] Just FYI: current update seams to break NUT dependancies

    29
    0 Votes
    29 Posts
    7k Views
    F
    Hi, I just wanted to comment that the provided packages work for all my server. Thank you!
  • Alcatel OXE on XCP-ng – anyone done this before?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    849 Views
    olivierlambertO
    Ah very good, so it was even easier than this. You had the Xen blk driver but instead of using an UUID, the appliance was having a hardcoded sda. Keep us posted
  • Storage domain server & Rolling pool upgrade

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    747 Views
    henri9813H
    @gregoire said: @olivierlambert I added this feature request in the backlog regarding RPU improvements. Hello, Thanks all ! Totally agree with @poddingue , be able to exclude VM which has: PCI attached devices Local storage ( maybe ? ) Could be a great option !
  • Install XCP-ng in old HP ProLiant DL160 G6 (gen 6)

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    For my reference later. wget http://downloads.hpe.com/pub/softlib2/software1/pubsw-linux/p1257348637/v76502/hpacucli-9.20-9.0.x86_64.rpm yum install -y --nogpgcheck hpacucli-9.20-9.0.x86_64.rpm hpacucli controller slot=0 physicaldrive all show
  • Boot device: Hard Disk - Success

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    632 Views
    O
    @fnf games If it hangs right after detecting the disk, it could be a bootloader or filesystem inconsistency from the snapshot state. Can you try booting the VM with a recovery ISO to check disk integrity or rebuild the bootloader?
  • XCP-NG upgrade 8.2 to 8.3

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    861 Views
    R
    To add a bit more detail on the upgrade path: strictly speaking, you do not need to apply outstanding 8.2 patches before upgrading. When you upgrade to 8.3, you are replacing the entire base system with the 8.3 release which already incorporates everything from the 8.2 patch stream. Any 8.2 patches you hadn't yet applied will simply be superseded. That said, applying them first is still a reasonable approach if you want a clean upgrade history and a fully-patched 8.2 baseline before jumping to 8.3. A few things worth checking before you start on a production pool: Check VM compatibility. Run a quick review of your VMs for any that might have specific OS or toolstack dependencies tied to 8.2. Most guests upgrade cleanly but it is worth knowing your environment. Use rolling pool upgrade if you have more than one host. XCP-ng supports rolling upgrades: you migrate VMs off each host, upgrade it, rejoin the pool, then proceed to the next. This maintains VM availability throughout the process. The XO interface handles this workflow if you have XOA. Back up before the jump. Export critical VM configurations or snapshots beforehand. If you use Xen Orchestra for backups, trigger a manual full backup job before starting. The upgrade itself via yum is straightforward: add the 8.3 repo, yum update, reboot. The toolstack and XAPI will handle pool registration after the host comes back up. After upgrading all hosts, run the post-upgrade checks from the docs (pool metadata sync, storage rescans) and verify HA is healthy if you use it.
  • Cannot shutdown VM or migrate

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    354 Views
    C
    Not sure the issue, but rebooted the host and everything is fine again. I definitely had rebooted the host twice though after applying the patches and physically unplugged and moved the host.
  • Nested virtualization

    9
    2
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    M
    @olivierlambert Can you provide insights? Is nested virtualization as in running Hyper-V inside a XCP-ng VM expected to work?
  • Hot-adding a resource

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    528 Views
    U
    Thank you all for your answers—now it's clear.
  • xcp-ng patches install fail

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    597 Views
    P
    https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/11951/just-fyi-current-update-seams-to-break-nut-dependancies
  • XCP-ng center 25.04.0 does not see guest-tools.iso

    5
    1
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    805 Views
    D
    Thank you for the input everyone. I've tested XenAdminQt and it sees iso library, thank you for advice! Reason for using XCP-ng center is ease of use/simplicity during quick testing deployments in comparison to XO.
  • Issues with new vm after latest 8.3 updates (priror to release)

    Solved
    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    888 Views
    olivierlambertO
    No worries, it happens! Glad you found the problem
  • USB-Passthrough does not survive reboot of VM

    3
    1
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    558 Views
    C
    @DustinB doesn't it use the exact same mechanism? I have to find out.
  • Issues joining pool with less pif on the newest host

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    2k Views
    A
    @semarie This pool is still on 8.2.1, we are trying to add this host in order upgrade with little to no downtime.