XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    /dev/xvda not appearing in guest

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Compute
    21 Posts 3 Posters 4.3k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K Offline
      keeely @olivierlambert
      last edited by

      @olivierlambert I found only this under advanced:

      f7eb4f1b-7c04-4d31-aa58-6d5d390c47b6-image.png

      Also under general section for the VM:

      93ede9ad-b089-43fa-ba0b-5774633efc29-image.png

      So what does that mean? HVM? If so where is the PVHVM option?

      Interestingly under disks, I see this:

      69614458-39a0-42e8-b7e1-ecd885fa3c57-image.png

      So the device is listed as xvda, however dmesg in the guest shows sda has been detected.

      62a2fba1-a229-4ea4-b508-1b4714be6748-image.png

      K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K Offline
        keeely @keeely
        last edited by

        @keeely Looking at the XOA appliance, it does seem to have the right mode:

        a88b6518-ff45-4b90-823c-45fad63ca8fd-image.png

        Shame there is no /proc/config.gz on that VM so I can lift the kernel config.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          So it means there's no emulated PV drivers installed (or they aren't loaded) 😕

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R Offline
            r1 XCP-ng Team
            last edited by

            Can you try and compile it with "M" and push them in initrd?

            Without PV drivers (Pure emulation mode) it generally detects as /dev/hda, seems it can also do /dev/sda.

            K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K Offline
              keeely @r1
              last edited by

              @r1 said in /dev/xvda not appearing in guest:

              Can you try and compile it with "M" and push them in initrd?

              I have been avoiding this due to the insane amount of time it takes to do the full module compile using nested virtualisation (Slackware under XCP-ng under VMWare Fusion). But assuming that I do do it, why do I need initrd? Can't I just boot using /dev/sda1, and load the vbd frontend driver after boot? Won't both those devices still be present?

              R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R Offline
                r1 XCP-ng Team @keeely
                last edited by

                @keeely Once the disk is opened by a program (emulated driver), and OS runs from it, I don't think it will allow Xen blkdev to take over. Thus the new module would render useless.

                By putting in initrd, the kernel will load it at boot time and then disk is opened to continue boot.

                CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_FRONTEND=y should have worked too but I guess that's another troubleshooting.

                K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K Offline
                  keeely @r1
                  last edited by

                  @r1 That's very useful info. I will try to make initrd.

                  K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • K Offline
                    keeely @keeely
                    last edited by

                    There is no need to use initrd, and I finally have this booting with kernel 4.4.14 and optimised IO.

                    Here are the kernel options I used:

                    # cat .config | grep XEN
                    CONFIG_XEN=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_DOM0=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_PVHVM=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_512GB=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_SAVE_RESTORE=y
                    # CONFIG_XEN_DEBUG_FS is not set
                    # CONFIG_XEN_PVH is not set
                    CONFIG_PCI_XEN=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_FRONTEND=y
                    # CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_BACKEND is not set
                    CONFIG_XEN_SCSI_FRONTEND=y
                    CONFIG_NETXEN_NIC=m
                    CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND=y
                    # CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_BACKEND is not set
                    CONFIG_INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND=y
                    CONFIG_HVC_XEN=y
                    CONFIG_HVC_XEN_FRONTEND=y
                    # CONFIG_TCG_XEN is not set
                    # CONFIG_XEN_WDT is not set
                    CONFIG_XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON=y
                    # CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON_MEMORY_HOTPLUG is not set
                    CONFIG_XEN_SCRUB_PAGES=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_DEV_EVTCHN=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_BACKEND=y
                    CONFIG_XENFS=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_XENFS=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_SYS_HYPERVISOR=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_GNTDEV=m
                    CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DEV_ALLOC=m
                    CONFIG_SWIOTLB_XEN=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND=m
                    # CONFIG_XEN_SCSI_BACKEND is not set
                    CONFIG_XEN_PRIVCMD=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m
                    # CONFIG_XEN_MCE_LOG is not set
                    CONFIG_XEN_HAVE_PVMMU=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_EFI=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_AUTO_XLATE=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_ACPI=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_SYMS=y
                    CONFIG_XEN_HAVE_VPMU=y
                    

                    XCP-ng Center reports IO Optimised.
                    XOA still reports the VM as HVM.

                    I can finally see the /dev/xvda device inside the guest however.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R Offline
                      r1 XCP-ng Team
                      last edited by

                      So some issue in between 4.4.14 (why not 4.4.229?) vs 5.4.21 (or 5.4.50?).

                      K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K Offline
                        keeely @r1
                        last edited by keeely

                        @r1 I haven't done a 'make oldconfig' using the 4.4.14 kernel config, which would obviously be the next step. There's a long time-period between those two kernels unfortunately, a lot could have changed. The config options in the kernel are somewhat different.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K Offline
                          keeely
                          last edited by

                          It seems I got a kernel panic for some other reason with 5.4.21. It's all working now, thanks.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D Don.Gould.NZ referenced this topic on
                          • First post
                            Last post