XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 7.6 RC1 available

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    71 Posts 12 Posters 45.0k Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • W Offline
      wayne @stormi
      last edited by

      @stormi my problem isn't the bug, there always be bugs.

      My problem is that there is no proper communication about it still. I think it is a serious issue about which you know before the 7.6 release as it was tested in rc phase apparently.

      It should have been mentioned when 7.6 was released, so anybody be aware what they're risking with upgrading.

      Anyhow, I'm glad that the fix is coming.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stormiS Offline
        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
        last edited by

        @wayne while it was found during the testing phase for 7.6, it was already present in 7.5 and hadn't been detected until late, so it let us assume that only few users were affected and that is was not worse to release 7.6 with it (and fix it fast) than it had been releasing 7.5 with it. We did not foresee that people still in 7.4 would skip 7.5 and discover the bug with 7.6.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stormiS Offline
          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
          last edited by

          That last comment is not intended as criticism of users who'd skip a release. It's just an explanation of why we thought it would not harm to release the 7.6 release as it was.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C Offline
            conradical
            last edited by

            FYI The newly released xcp-emu-manager-0.0.6-2.x86_64.rpm has resolved the migration issues that i could produce.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stormiS Offline
              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
              last edited by

              Thanks, this is good news!

              C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C Offline
                conradical @stormi
                last edited by

                @stormi Yes it is!!

                stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stormiS Offline
                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @conradical
                  last edited by

                  @conradical Since you had issues in 7.5 also, would you mind testing xcp-emu-manager-0.0.3-1.2.x86_64.rpm which is still in the updates_testing repository too?

                  yum install xcp-emu-manager --enablerepo='xcp-ng-updates-testing'
                  
                  C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C Offline
                    conradical @stormi
                    last edited by

                    @stormi
                    I don't have that pool anymore because I just yum updated it. If I get time i'll deploy 7.5 again.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by

                      Yeah, the current patch is able to make it working if the load is not too huge. We are still working to get it fully functional 🙂

                      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C Offline
                        conradical @olivierlambert
                        last edited by

                        @olivierlambert said in XCP-ng 7.6 RC1 available:

                        e it working if the load is not

                        I had this happen on VMs even when they had no load, but now they work. I suspect it's ignoring other progress messages that were the problem in my case.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • G Offline
                          glipschitz
                          last edited by

                          This issue still appears to be present in 7.6.
                          It it resolved in 7.6.3? I'm reluctant to pull hosts down without being able to move VM's safely without having to stop them.

                          Cheers
                          Greg

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stormiS Offline
                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                            last edited by

                            There is no such thing as XCP-ng 7.6.3 (but there's XCP-ng Center 7.6.3). There's just XCP-ng 7.6 with latest updates applied.

                            The migration issues discussed above have been fixed in an update to the xcp-emu-manager package. That specific update does not require a reboot of the hosts: only a toolstack restart.

                            You can either apply it from Xen Orchestra, or from command line with yum update xcp-emu-manager. Then xe-toolstack-restart.

                            Once all hosts have the update, migration should be smooth.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stormiS Offline
                              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                              last edited by

                              Then I recommend that you apply all the other updates, but you may want to wait for one day or two because there are security fixes on their way.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stormiS Offline
                                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                last edited by stormi

                                Actually, looks like I had already written something about it in the Updates Howto: https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/wiki/Updates-Howto#a-special-word-about-xcp-ng-75-76-and-live-migrations

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post