XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Wyse 5070 VM won't booting after update bios 1.27

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    21 Posts 4 Posters 2.8k Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T Offline
      t.chamberlain @olivierlambert
      last edited by

      @olivierlambert Completely agree, years old consumer/non-HCL compliant hardware shouldn't rate in overall development progress & a pin is about the best we should hope for.

      It might just be time for some home labbers to start shopping & retire come gear!

      The XCP-NG community & platform are amazing...keep up the great work!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • stormiS Offline
        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
        last edited by

        Making sure (how?) this topic is indexed by search engines would be a good starting point.

        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stormiS Offline
          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @stormi
          last edited by

          My search engine just made me discover this one: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/8584/dell-wyse-fw-update-breaks-vm-booting-console-frozen-tianocore-edk2-related

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stormiS Offline
            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
            last edited by

            So, could you get some logs from the boot failures?

            • head /proc/cpuinfo
            • full output of xl dmesg including booting the problem VM with the good and bad ucode in place
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T Offline
              t.chamberlain
              last edited by stormi

              @stormi said in Wyse 5070 VM won't booting after update bios 1.27:

              head /proc/cpuinfo

              Here info for my 3 nodes.

              xenserver01.trc.blox_cpuinfo.txt
              xenserver01.trc.blox_xl_dmesg.txt
              xenserver02.trc.blox_cpuinfo.txt
              xenserver02.trc.blox_xl_dmesg.txt
              xenserver03.trc.blox_cpuinfo.txt
              xenserver03.trc.blox_xl_dmesg.txt

              stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stormiS Offline
                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @t.chamberlain
                last edited by

                @t-chamberlain Is the output of xl dmesg with, or without the bad microcode? Did a VM fail to boot since the hosts were booted?

                T 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T Offline
                  t.chamberlain @stormi
                  last edited by

                  @stormi

                  Those are the microcode downgraded hosts. I can upgrade the packages & get those outputs as well if need be.

                  stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T Offline
                    t.chamberlain @stormi
                    last edited by

                    @stormi Sorry about that only answered part of the question. I did have a vm fail to boot, but it was because of an underlying issues with drbd/xostor & don't believe related to the microcode.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stormiS Offline
                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @t.chamberlain
                      last edited by

                      @t-chamberlain Yes, please. One host, with one failed VM start, would be enough

                      T 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T Offline
                        t.chamberlain @stormi
                        last edited by

                        @stormi

                        Here is the xl_dmesg output after the microcode update.

                        xenserver02.trc.blox_microcode_upd_xl_dmesg.txt

                        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T Offline
                          t.chamberlain @stormi
                          last edited by

                          @stormi

                          You can see the vms just kind of hang here.

                          374c345a-8aef-4d42-8aaa-d997590415a6-image.png

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierlambertO olivierlambert referenced this topic on
                          • stormiS Offline
                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @t.chamberlain
                            last edited by stormi

                            @t-chamberlain Was the xl dmesg output produced before, or after the VM hanged?

                            T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • T Offline
                              t.chamberlain @stormi
                              last edited by

                              @stormi At that point that vm dsk05002 was hung for about 20 minutes. I don't know if it where are like this that an alert event is ever generated.

                              If need be I can boot a vm & just let it go.

                              stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stormiS Offline
                                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @t.chamberlain
                                last edited by

                                @t-chamberlain No need to, unless you have some doubts. For now the conclusion will be xl dmesg doesn't output anything particular when the VM hangs.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stormiS Offline
                                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                  last edited by

                                  However, logs from a debug Xen might give more clues.

                                  If you can, please follow the instructions given by @andyhhp - a Xen developer - at https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/74855.

                                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • A Offline
                                    andyhhp Xen Guru @stormi
                                    last edited by andyhhp

                                    @t-chamberlain In addition to the XTF testing, could you also please (with the bad microcode) try booting Xen with spec-ctrl=no-verw on the command line, and seeing whether that changes the behaviour of your regular VMs? Please capture xl dmesg from this run too.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • stormiS Offline
                                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                      last edited by

                                      Doc about XTF testing: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/project/development-process/tests/#test-the-xen-hypervisor-itself

                                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A Offline
                                        andyhhp Xen Guru @stormi
                                        last edited by

                                        @t-chamberlain I've got a fix from Intel, and @stormi has packaged it.

                                        yum update microcode_ctl --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing should get you microcode_ctl-2.1-26.xs29.2.xcpng8.2 which has the fixed microcode for this issue in it.

                                        T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • T Offline
                                          t.chamberlain @andyhhp
                                          last edited by

                                          @andyhhp giving this a shot now.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • stormiS stormi referenced this topic on
                                          • First post
                                            Last post