XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Can xcp-ng utilize TPM 2.0 via passthrough or does TPM only work via vTPM?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    8 Posts 4 Posters 2.0k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Z Offline
      zachpeele
      last edited by

      I am purchasing several Dell Servers soon and would like to utilize the included TPM 2.0 module. However, I am unsure if xcp-ng will actually use the module or just use vTPM via passthrough. If it can't use the TPM module then I would rather not pay for the module and I will have it removed.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D Offline
        DustinB
        last edited by DustinB

        You'll be able to utilize the built in chip, for anyone else that doesn't have a TPM2.0 chip the virtual chip would be used.

        And for what its worth, I would recommend the physical chip over the virtualized one.

        Z 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • Z Offline
          zachpeele @DustinB
          last edited by

          @DustinB Thanks for the reply! That helps me out very much.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C Offline
            clip
            last edited by

            Thanks for this interesting discussion.

            @DustinB In your understanding, does using a built-in chip limit Windows 11 VM (for example) host migrations?

            Said another way, is vTPM recommended/required for VMs that will potentially run on multiple hosts?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Offline
              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              There's no other way to virtualize a device if it's shared between multiple VMs and requires VM to move. Like any PCI passthrough device for example.

              C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • C Offline
                clip @olivierlambert
                last edited by clip

                @olivierlambert Thank you, that was my understanding from reading the documentation - in which case, for multiple host / VM migration scenarios, a physical TPM2 chip is of no benefit - and thus not required?

                Per: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/7487/vtpm-support-requirements, Stormi (in June of 2023) has confirmed that a physical TPM hardware module is not required for vTPM. I assume, when buying host hardware for Windows VMs, it is correct to count on this for the future as well.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierlambertO Offline
                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                  last edited by olivierlambert

                  That's correct, no need for a physical TPM for your VMs.

                  C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • C Offline
                    clip @olivierlambert
                    last edited by

                    @olivierlambert Thank you - appreciate for the confirmation.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1

                    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                    Register Login
                    • First post
                      Last post