XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Any negative about using a bonded vlan interface for xostor traffic?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XOSTOR
    1 Posts 1 Posters 482 Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • TheNorthernLightT Offline
      TheNorthernLight
      last edited by

      Hello,
      We have 4 Dell R7525 hosts, each with Dual 100G QSFP+ nics running LACP bonded connections to two Dell Z9100 switches running a VLT domain.
      I had to setup the host using one of the onboard 1G nics initially, and then once it was setup and joined to the pool, I switched the management interface to the bonded vlan (that matches my management network vlan).
      I can get to the test host, and everything seems to work.
      I still have to finish making the same changes to the sub-and master in this pool, but I dont foresee any real issue.

      However, I'm not certain of two things:

      1. Can Xostor use a bonded vlan for Xostor traffic? (the bond is effectively 2x100GB total across both interfaces).
      2. Is there any recommendation against doing it this way? (for production use I should mention)
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

      Register Login
      • First post
        Last post