XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Any negative about using a bonded vlan interface for xostor traffic?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XOSTOR
    1 Posts 1 Posters 169 Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • TheNorthernLightT Offline
      TheNorthernLight
      last edited by

      Hello,
      We have 4 Dell R7525 hosts, each with Dual 100G QSFP+ nics running LACP bonded connections to two Dell Z9100 switches running a VLT domain.
      I had to setup the host using one of the onboard 1G nics initially, and then once it was setup and joined to the pool, I switched the management interface to the bonded vlan (that matches my management network vlan).
      I can get to the test host, and everything seems to work.
      I still have to finish making the same changes to the sub-and master in this pool, but I dont foresee any real issue.

      However, I'm not certain of two things:

      1. Can Xostor use a bonded vlan for Xostor traffic? (the bond is effectively 2x100GB total across both interfaces).
      2. Is there any recommendation against doing it this way? (for production use I should mention)
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • First post
        Last post