@john.c Why not, can you share what would be the first tools to support and your use cases? I assume that if you are working in VSCode you might be useing some infrastructure as code, like Terraform or Pulumi or Ansible, isn't? In these case do you also have some related MCP servers enabled?
Team - DevOps
Posts
-
RE: DevOps Megathread: what you need and how we can help!
-
RE: Pulumi Xen Orchestra - News
Release v2.2.0
This new version introduces a new field, 'memory_min', for the VM resource and makes a slight change to the 'memory_max' field, which now sets both the dynamic and static maximum memory limits and providing better control of VM memory.
What's Changed
- feat: Update TF provider to get VM memory improvements by @gCyrille in https://github.com/vatesfr/pulumi-xenorchestra/pull/420
Full Changelog: https://github.com/vatesfr/pulumi-xenorchestra/compare/v2.1.0...v2.2.0
- JavaScript/TypeScript: @vates/pulumi-xenorchestra
- Python: pulumi-xenorchestra
- Go: github.com/vatesfr/pulumi-xenorchestra/sdk
- .NET: Pulumi.Xenorchestra
-
RE: DevOps Megathread: what you need and how we can help!
New releases for Terraform and Pulumi providers!
This new version introduces a new field,
memory_min
, for the VM resource and makes a slight change to thememory_max
field, which now sets both the dynamic and static maximum memory limits and providing better control of VM memory.Pulumi Provider v2.2.0
Terraform Provider v0.33.0
Xen Orchestra Go SDK v1.4.0 -
RE: DevOps Megathread: what you need and how we can help!
Pulumi Xen Orchestra Provider - Pre-Release v2.2.0-alpha.1
This is the pre-release version, which includes the changes to the memory_max field and adds the new memory_min field.
https://github.com/vatesfr/pulumi-xenorchestra/releases/tag/v2.2.0-alpha.1
-
RE: DevOps Megathread: what you need and how we can help!
@bufanda said in DevOps Megathread: what you need and how we can help!:
@sid I made that request a while ago, and tried to look into myself too, but the current API of XenOrchestra just doesn't support it, there are many pieces missing from what I could see. I hope with XenOrchestra 6 the API wil support it though.
That's the point. We started working on it, but it wasn't possible to implement the required functionality in the TF provider using the current JRPC API. We are working with the XO team to provide feedback to make it happen with the REST API. I hope the backup resource will be available with XO6
NB: If you want to take a look, there are branches on the GitHub repository. These are for both the provider and the Golang client.
-
RE: DevOps Megathread: what you need and how we can help!
Hi @afk!
We are working on a new version of the Xen Orchestra Terraform provider to improve VM memory control.In this new version, the
memory_max
setting will now set the maximum limits for both the dynamic and static memory.There is also an optional new setting called 'memory_min', which can be used to set the minimum limit for dynamic VM memory.
This version will also resolve the issue with template memory limits used during VM creation.Can you test this pre-release version and provide us with some feedback? Or maybe just tell us if this new behaviour is more likely to meet your needs?
https://github.com/vatesfr/terraform-provider-xenorchestra/releases/tag/v0.33.0-alpha.1
I will try asap to do a pre-release version for the Pulumi provider.
-
RE: Packer / Pulumi examples for Ubuntu and Windows VMs
Hi, thank you for the example! We will take a look. It could be a good idea to have a dedicated documentation/web page with usage examples of 'DevOps' tools
-
RE: VM UUID via dmidecode does not match VM ID in xen-orchestra
@deefdragon can you check if
/sys/hypervisor/uuid
matches your VMs UUID? -
RE: VM UUID via dmidecode does not match VM ID in xen-orchestra
Hi,
Do you know what causes the system UUID to change and not match the VM UUID?In the tests I have run (with Debian and Microk8s), it never changed.
-
RE: Kubernetes Recipe VM failed to start - Raise Network Interfaces
@deefdragon We are still trying to figure out why the DHCP isn't working. Our tests showed no issues with the recipe and DHCP.
We don't yet plan to enable up/down scaling for the recipe, but we are working on adding the CCM. We welcome suggestions: what do you need and how would you like the up/down scaling feature to work in the XOA recipe?