how to build blktap from sources?
-
Can you provide a bit more info, how to do it?
I managed to build the package, but it was not the right version and with the wrong headers. Do you have something like a commandlist to give me some hints?
I'm playing around with ZFS and would build my own blktap-package to modify and test some things.
-
Yes, it's quite complicated.
You need xenserver-build-env, and a repo of someone else's already compiled RPMs.
I added the repo to my Dockerfile:
COPY xcp-ng.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/xcp-ng-base.repo
Then I created a launch script:
#!/usr/bin/env bash (cd ../blktap && git diff 41bdd82242104ecea3f654f12704fe8122dfdf41 ) > nr-remove-odirect.patch docker build -t xenserver/xenserver-build-env . python run.py -v `pwd`:/builddir -v `pwd`/repo-7.4:/repo-7.4 -s /Volumes/7.4.0\ Source/SPackages/blktap-3.5.0-1.12.src.rpm /builddir/build-blktap-inside-docker.sh
build-blktap-inside-docker.sh
is here:#!/usr/bin/env bash set -ex sudo yum -y remove kernel-headers sudo rpm -ivh /repo-7.4/x86_64/kernel-headers-4.4.52-3.2.2.x86_64.rpm rpm -ivh local-SRPMs/blktap-3.5.0-1.12.src.rpm sudo yum-builddep -y blktap cp /builddir/nr-remove-odirect.patch rpmbuild/SOURCES/ cp /builddir/blktap.spec rpmbuild/SPECS/ rpmbuild -ba rpmbuild/SPECS/blktap.spec cp rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/blktap-3.5.0-1.12test.x86_64.rpm /builddir
The specfile just has a patch added and its version changed:
Patch54: nr-remove-odirect.patch
good luck.
-
hui ... will try that ...
-
@nraynaud said in how to build blktap from sources?:
repo-7.4
whats inside this directory? content of the XenServer 7.4 source iso?
-
ahh... maybe this? https://updates.xcp-ng.org/7/dev/builddeps/x86_64/Packages/
-
ok, got it working! my own blktap is running Thanks for your help!
-
@borzel sorry, I missed your question, glad you got it working.
what changes are you making?
-
First just playing around to get knowledge of this, maybe I find some usefull things. Don't know exactly, but I want to understand a bit more what I'm using here.
Can sometimes be handy to know such things. Everytime I learned something I was using it later at work or privat
-
Good idea We are glad to have more potential contributors on board. More the XCP-ng knowledge is spread, better the community!
-
@borzel Congratulations! And I can relate to the feeling
-
There's now a new and reproducible way to build blktap in a clean environment:
https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp-ng-build-env
I will not copy the readme here, but basically, you can do something like that:
Preparation
# create the build image, target current dev branch of XCP-ng (which is the future 7.5) # There's no support for 7.4 because of different repository structure and missing devel packages # You need to do it just once, though doing it from time to time won't hurt. ./build.sh dev # create an useful alias for later. You should probably add it to you .bashrc so that it stays # The --rm part is not mandatory but I find it useful to keep docker's disk usage low. alias xcp-build="$(pwd)/run.py --rm"
Build
Here I'll show you how to build from our new git repositories. Not all packages are present there, but blktap is and this is a good occasion to make you become accustomed to using them since that's where we'll commit patches and also experimental stuff.
# from the directory of your choice... git clone https://github.com/xcp-ng-rpms/blktap.git # or a forked version if you intend to send pull requests cd blktap # ... here make changes... or not... # use our shiny new alias to build it xcp-build --build-local . # or simply 'xcp-build -l .'
The resulting built RPMs will be in the SRPMS and RPMS subdirectories of your git working directory.
Just tested with blktap. If it fails at building another package, open a separate thread and I'll try to fix it.
Bonus: build with experimental changes applied
Our blktap package can be built with an experimental patch for better ZFS support. Build it this way:
xcp-build --build-local . --define 'xcp_ng_section extras'
-
If someone fails to build, maybe the git-lfs in not properly initialised. To fetch the lfs-files aftergit clone
you can do agit lfs fetch
.
weird ... after the second time installing git-lfs and again cloning the repo, it worked...