XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    FIX to XCP-ng

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    17 Posts 4 Posters 2.1k Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormiS Online
      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
      last edited by

      If having that fix is worth the trouble of updating a pool (and xenopsd updates can cause migration failures between hosts of a pool being updated), we could.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • _danielgurgel_ Offline
        _danielgurgel
        last edited by

        I think it's i'm going through this problem. we are migrating from CH8 to XCP and during migrate, I have noticed failure in the process (migre stalled at 100% and does not conclude) or unexpected shutdown occurs in virtual server.

        Does this bug affect migrate after a pool is 100% updated with XCP8 (with all updates applied)?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stormiS Online
          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
          last edited by

          Was it stuck at Caught Xs_protocol.Enoent("directory"): cleaning up VM stat like the commit message says?

          @_danielgurgel said in FIX to XCP-ng:

          Does this bug affect migrate after a pool is 100% updated with XCP8 (with all updates applied)?

          Which bug exactly?

          _danielgurgel_ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • _danielgurgel_ Offline
            _danielgurgel @stormi
            last edited by

            @stormi Described in CA-327906 🙃

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • _danielgurgel_ Offline
              _danielgurgel @stormi
              last edited by

              @stormi said in FIX to XCP-ng:

              cleaning up VM stat

              Yes, I received the error, see below:

              xensource.log:Nov 27 08:20:32 SECH82 xenopsd-xc: [debug|SECH82|24 |Async.VM.pool_migrate R:8472b9c00966|xenops_server] Caught Xenops_interface.Xenopsd_error([S(Storage_backend_error);[S(SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_46);[S();S(The VDI is not available [opterr=VDI e3222f55-10ce-4d85-b6a8-a7c81f1a5a1d not detached cleanly]);S()]]]): cleaning up VM state
              
              [10:14 SECH82 log]# cat /etc/xensource-inventory
              PRIMARY_DISK='/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-36d0946606f4911002317966d118d6a4f'
              DOM0_VCPUS='16'
              PRODUCT_VERSION='8.0.0'
              DOM0_MEM='8192'
              CONTROL_DOMAIN_UUID='8320160d-3a65-4051-8d55-2e619ad4875f'
              MANAGEMENT_ADDRESS_TYPE='IPv4'
              COMPANY_NAME_SHORT='Open Source'
              PARTITION_LAYOUT='ROOT,BACKUP,LOG,BOOT,SWAP,SR'
              PRODUCT_VERSION_TEXT='8.0'
              INSTALLATION_UUID='a394d22c-94a9-4e83-89c0-fd366b191216'
              PRODUCT_BRAND='XCP-ng'
              BRAND_CONSOLE='XCP-ng Center'
              PRODUCT_VERSION_TEXT_SHORT='8.0'
              MANAGEMENT_INTERFACE='xenbr2'
              PRODUCT_NAME='xenenterprise'
              STUNNEL_LEGACY='true'
              BUILD_NUMBER='release/naples/master/45'
              PLATFORM_VERSION='3.0.0'
              COMPANY_PRODUCT_BRAND='XCP-ng'
              PLATFORM_NAME='XCP'
              BACKUP_PARTITION='/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-36d0946606f4911002317966d118d6a4f-part2'
              BRAND_CONSOLE_URL='https://xcp-ng.org'
              INSTALLATION_DATE='2019-11-27 01:22:15.630698'
              COMPANY_NAME='Open Source'
              
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                I'm not completely sure it's the same issue. Have you double check that you have ejected VM CD before doing migration?

                _danielgurgel_ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • _danielgurgel_ Offline
                  _danielgurgel @olivierlambert
                  last edited by

                  @olivierlambert Yes, all VMs have ejected CD.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    Ideally, we could make a patch a see if it fixes your issue.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stormiS Online
                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                      last edited by

                      I've built xenopsd with that patch.

                      You can download the xenopsd and xenopsd-xc packages (both need to be updated) there:

                      • https://koji.xcp-ng.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/362/10362/xenopsd-0.101.0-2.0.1.xcpng8.0.x86_64.rpm
                      • https://koji.xcp-ng.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/362/10362/xenopsd-xc-0.101.0-2.0.1.xcpng8.0.x86_64.rpm

                      I believe a toolstack restart is enough afterwards.

                      _danielgurgel_ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                      • M Offline
                        maxcuttins
                        last edited by

                        What amazing support ♥

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • _danielgurgel_ Offline
                          _danielgurgel @stormi
                          last edited by

                          @stormi After applying the new patch, migrations are no longer failing. We just tested on a new cluster with 20 servers.

                          Thank you so much for your help.
                          This patch be including as official update?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                            last edited by

                            We can do that yes.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stormiS Online
                              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                              last edited by stormi

                              Did the patch fix migrations that were failing before, for the same VMs? Else we're not sure that the issue you had previously was fixed by it.

                              Your error message was
                              Caught Xenops_interface.Xenopsd_error([S(Storage_backend_error);[S(SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_46);[S();S(The VDI is not available [opterr=VDI e3222f55-10ce-4d85-b6a8-a7c81f1a5a1d not detached cleanly]);S()]]])

                              In the commit message the error message that the patch fixes is:
                              Caught Xs_protocol.Enoent("directory")

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stormiS Online
                                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                last edited by stormi

                                Note: the patch only fixes migration for VMs without any network interface. Was that the case for you?

                                Edit: looks like this patch could be a fix for https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/issues/269

                                elialum created this issue in xcp-ng/xcp

                                closed live migration failed - Xenops_interface.Does_not_exist #269

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • _danielgurgel_ Offline
                                  _danielgurgel
                                  last edited by

                                  @stormi it seems to be the same problem.

                                  Sorry, it may have been the "placebo effect" but after applying the update we no longer had the error when making the migrate.

                                  I'm going to continue the tests... and with VMs without network card, as described in the link.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • _danielgurgel_ Offline
                                    _danielgurgel
                                    last edited by

                                    Before applying the patch, in a new pool (during the CH8 update process to XCP8), when moving any VM to the updated host I received the error below.

                                    After installing the patch on the master host and restarting the toolstack on the host master and the source host, we no longer notice error, with the migrate process successfully completing.

                                    The error condition was the failed shutdown of the VM in the live migrate process. So I think the patch made available actually solves the problem in question. (for VMs with and without network interfaces)

                                    Nov 30 12:54:48 SECH82 xapi: [error|SECH82|946189 ||backtrace] Async.VM.pool_migrate R:29b4b31d74de failed with exception Server_error(INTERNAL_ERROR, [ xenopsd internal error: Device_common.QMP_Error(135, "{\"error\":{\"class\":\"GenericError\",\"desc\":\"Unable to open /dev/fdset/0: No such file or directory\",\"data\":{}},\"id\":\"qmp-000029-135\"}") ])
                                    Nov 30 12:54:48 SECH82 xapi: [error|SECH82|946189 ||backtrace] Raised Server_error(INTERNAL_ERROR, [ xenopsd internal error: Device_common.QMP_Error(135, "{\"error\":{\"class\":\"GenericError\",\"desc\":\"Unable to open /dev/fdset/0: No such file or directory\",\"data\":{}},\"id\":\"qmp-000029-135\"}") ])
                                    Nov 30 12:54:48 SECH82 xapi: [error|SECH82|946189 ||backtrace] 1/1 xapi @ SECH82 Raised at file (Thread 946189 has no backtrace table. Was with_backtraces called?, line 0
                                    Nov 30 12:54:48 SECH82 xapi: [error|SECH82|946189 ||backtrace]
                                    
                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post