XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    CPU Usage Mismatch

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    6 Posts 3 Posters 1.0k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S Offline
      SomeFixItDude
      last edited by

      Hi I am pretty new to xcp-ng and xoa. The cpu reported in the graphs doesn't match the actual. Or maybe I don't understand something? I also went on to the host and verified the cpu usage matches htop's values. The XOA graph says a pretty consistent 38% usage of one of the cpus.

      alt text

      Not sure how to get the image on here but here is the link: https://ibb.co/t2Bx8VC

      Thanks!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jedimarcusJ Offline
        jedimarcus
        last edited by

        What's your issue? That it says 38 on the left an 31 on the right?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S Offline
          SomeFixItDude
          last edited by

          Thanks for responding @jedimarcus

          I am just missing something possibly... The procs say cpu 1, 2, 3 and they are all 1.3% or lower. If you are referring to the lower area, in the table. That is 30% out of 300% I believe. Again I could just be misunderstanding how its being reporting. This is why I am asking. What i was expecting was, the breakout of cpu 1, 2, and 3 at the top left of htop to match the xoa chart, but these are different values?

          Thanks!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jedimarcusJ Offline
            jedimarcus
            last edited by

            I'm not sure why htop summary says 3x < 1.3% but on the bottom table, you can obviously see that there is a process using >30% CPU...

            I guess this is a htop question, not a XOA or XCP-ng question.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B Offline
              Biggen
              last edited by Biggen

              Did you have more cores/less cores assigned at some point to the VM? I noticed something similar some time ago. It took a host reboot to flush the RRDs which got XO(A) reporting CPU utilization accurately again for me.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S Offline
                SomeFixItDude
                last edited by

                I actually had more cores assigned to the vm earlier. Maybe that caused it.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                Register Login
                • First post
                  Last post