Base Copy / VDI not merged
-
@olivierlambert said in Base Copy / VDI not merged:
It worked as long as you had no coalesce issues or lag, or a snapshot wasn't removed or garbage collected correctly. In short, you had very little room for error. Using ext will give you all that space you need
what I don't understand is: when use Ext SR in same condition (sr 890gb vm 400gb) when do a backup it will no longer be created base_copy ?
this base copy is created only when use lvm SR ?Or what is the difference between Ext/lvm regarding backup process
thank you
-
Ext is thin pro, meaning yes, you still have the base copy, but the active disk will be only few KiB instead of the full size in LVM. It's not backup related but storage thin vs thick.
-
Ok i understand now
What do you think about this aproach of machine configuration:
- 1 hdd 200Gb as xcp.ng os
- 1 hdd 1Tb as primary Ext SR Local Storage with 2 vm running (principal vm and xoa vm)
- 1 hdd 1Tb as seccondary Ext SR Local Storage where i will do Continuous Replication of that vm
Of course i will do and a full backup of vm to a smb share, and from here a new backup to external hdd
I know that CR will be more efficient if it was done to another machine in another location ... but in the next future will be.
Thankyou
-
I was about to tell you a warning about doing on CR on the same host but you are aware about the risk doing that, so I have nothing to add, it looks OK
-
yep i know but i think it is much better to have 2 Ext SR each with 1 hdd than to have 1 SR with a raid with 2 hdd, regarding downtime in case of failure disk
