XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    [DEPRECATED] SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    75 Posts 20 Posters 29.2k Views 19 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Marc.pezinM Offline
      Marc.pezin Vates πŸͺ Marketing @r1
      last edited by

      @r1 You are absolutely right, I have updated the command in the initial post and in the devblog. Thanks.

      R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R Offline
        r1 XCP-ng Team @Marc.pezin
        last edited by

        @Marc-pezin Thanks. I'd suggest to also add # xe-toolstack-restart so that Error code: MISSING_URI does not show up πŸ‘

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • R Offline
          r1 XCP-ng Team
          last edited by

          @ronan-a is VDI move from SMAPIv1 to SMAPIv3 supported?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierlambertO Offline
            olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
            last edited by

            Nope. I don't know if it's even planned by Citrix.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C Offline
              cg @olivierlambert
              last edited by

              @olivierlambert said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

              raw means any "whole" block device, meaning no snapshot, clone, no shared SR case, etc. Doesn't matter what's underneath. I would say the first use case is passing a whole drive to a VM (eg FreeNAS).

              But yeah, you would be able to pass a LUN if you like πŸ™‚

              Sounds a bit like VVOLs from VMware. Not sure how exactly they work but LUNs exclusively for VMs could be an easy thing, regarding TRIM/DISCARD etc.

              It just still needs mechanics for XAPI etc. to grab/backup them. Also Snapshots could be done with that, just a different logic.

              But first it's probably a target for people needing pure performance.

              @olivierlambert said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

              Nope. I don't know if it's even planned by Citrix.

              Noone noes if Citrix has plans at all - not even paying customers. Their communication is kind of a nightmare.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                Eager to see CH 8.1 and what they did to improve their driver to support storage live migration πŸ™‚

                C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C Offline
                  cg @olivierlambert
                  last edited by

                  @olivierlambert said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

                  Eager to see CH 8.1 and what they did to improve their driver to support storage live migration πŸ™‚

                  Any idea about the release date? I mean their "one release a quater" only worked for very short and they failed again with 8.1, which should have been released until 1st of October.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    I think we can reasonably imagine for the end of the year or so πŸ™‚

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C Offline
                      cg
                      last edited by

                      Then 8.1 should be the new LTSR. I'd appreciate that. Will XCP-ng follow that concept?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        Why do you think it will be the next LTSR?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C Offline
                          cg
                          last edited by

                          IIRC they said this year should bring another LTSR - as the old one becomes quite old now. The last chance would be a release in Q4 - that would also fit for 7.1 LTSR -> 8.1 LTSR (basically making 8.0 evolutions mature/tested)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                            olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                            last edited by

                            Do you remember where you read this?

                            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • A Offline
                              AllooTikeeChaat @olivierlambert
                              last edited by

                              @olivierlambert

                              Citrix, have recently announced via blog post that the next reported XenApp/XenDesktop LTSR release is due end Q4 2019 so its possible CH8.1 might show up at the same time.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • olivierlambertO Offline
                                olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                last edited by

                                Damn I probably missed that post, can you put the URL here please?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • C Offline
                                  cg
                                  last edited by

                                  They removed the Hypervisor tag from their blog, so finding that posts isn't easy anmore and CH/XS posts get lost in stuff I don't care about.

                                  Looks a bit like they only want to keep it because VMware Horizon becomes more attractive, if Citrix doesn't bring it's own HV for XenApp/XenDesktop for free.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                                    olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                    last edited by

                                    Citrix want to keep their HV/platform because they don't want to rely only on competitors to run XenApp/XenDesktop. It's just not a "product" but a technical part of their solution.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                                      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                      last edited by

                                      I can't find anything on this blog πŸ˜•

                                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A Offline
                                        AllooTikeeChaat @olivierlambert
                                        last edited by

                                        @olivierlambert

                                        Its all about XA/XD I'm afraid but it does state year end 2019 for the next LTSR.

                                        https://www.citrix.com/blogs/2019/09/19/whats-new-with-citrix-virtual-apps-and-desktops-september-2019/

                                        "Long-Term Service Release News

                                        For those of you on 7.15 LTSR β€” one of our most popular releases β€” we have some exciting news about our next LTSR availability. We’re planning our next LTSR for year-end."

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • C Offline
                                          cg
                                          last edited by

                                          Somewhere they said they want to algin numbers and XA/XD LTRS only makes sense on a fitting CH LTSR.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                                            olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                            last edited by

                                            Hmm okay so it's not written directly. We'll see soon enough πŸ™‚

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post