XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    [DEPRECATED] SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    75 Posts 20 Posters 29.2k Views 19 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C Offline
      cg
      last edited by

      Then 8.1 should be the new LTSR. I'd appreciate that. Will XCP-ng follow that concept?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO Offline
        olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        Why do you think it will be the next LTSR?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C Offline
          cg
          last edited by

          IIRC they said this year should bring another LTSR - as the old one becomes quite old now. The last chance would be a release in Q4 - that would also fit for 7.1 LTSR -> 8.1 LTSR (basically making 8.0 evolutions mature/tested)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierlambertO Offline
            olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
            last edited by

            Do you remember where you read this?

            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A Offline
              AllooTikeeChaat @olivierlambert
              last edited by

              @olivierlambert

              Citrix, have recently announced via blog post that the next reported XenApp/XenDesktop LTSR release is due end Q4 2019 so its possible CH8.1 might show up at the same time.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                Damn I probably missed that post, can you put the URL here please?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C Offline
                  cg
                  last edited by

                  They removed the Hypervisor tag from their blog, so finding that posts isn't easy anmore and CH/XS posts get lost in stuff I don't care about.

                  Looks a bit like they only want to keep it because VMware Horizon becomes more attractive, if Citrix doesn't bring it's own HV for XenApp/XenDesktop for free.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    Citrix want to keep their HV/platform because they don't want to rely only on competitors to run XenApp/XenDesktop. It's just not a "product" but a technical part of their solution.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by

                      I can't find anything on this blog πŸ˜•

                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A Offline
                        AllooTikeeChaat @olivierlambert
                        last edited by

                        @olivierlambert

                        Its all about XA/XD I'm afraid but it does state year end 2019 for the next LTSR.

                        https://www.citrix.com/blogs/2019/09/19/whats-new-with-citrix-virtual-apps-and-desktops-september-2019/

                        "Long-Term Service Release News

                        For those of you on 7.15 LTSR β€” one of our most popular releases β€” we have some exciting news about our next LTSR availability. We’re planning our next LTSR for year-end."

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C Offline
                          cg
                          last edited by

                          Somewhere they said they want to algin numbers and XA/XD LTRS only makes sense on a fitting CH LTSR.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                            olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                            last edited by

                            Hmm okay so it's not written directly. We'll see soon enough πŸ™‚

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C Offline
                              cocoon XCP-ng Center Team
                              last edited by

                              Hi, is the "raw-device-plugin" branch already working?
                              https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp-ng-xapi-storage/tree/feat/raw-device-plugin

                              I just upgraded to 8.0 and wanted to try it now and found out, that the latest released package is v1.0.2 and is missing the raw-device.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • olivierlambertO Offline
                                olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                last edited by

                                @ronan-a is still working on it, and he's in the middle of a load of tests/benchs.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • C Offline
                                  cocoon XCP-ng Center Team
                                  last edited by

                                  OK thanks, so I better should wait a bit before I try anything?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                                    olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                    last edited by

                                    Exactly.

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • R Offline
                                      ravenet @olivierlambert
                                      last edited by

                                      @olivierlambert @ronan-a Has there been any update on this development? I do see an update to master in org.xen.xapi.storage.raw-device from feb 2020. is it more safe to test now?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                                        olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                        last edited by

                                        SMAPIv3 isn't production ready yet (we aren't really happy with the current state of it). Also because we are working on LINSTOR storage with LINBIT, it takes a lot of our storage R&D/resources right now. We can't be everywhere, so we have to prioritize…

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • R Offline
                                          ravenet
                                          last edited by

                                          Ok, thanks for the update. Wasn't expecting production ready, was just curious on status and if was safe to run tests with it which sounds like not.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • R Offline
                                            ravenet
                                            last edited by

                                            I see movement in the github repo again. Good sign!

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post