USB passthrough test reports in 7.5RC1



  • @redalert11 Nice! I'll give that a shot when I get a chance. I had resorted to using usb over ip until it worked.


  • XCP-ng Team

    Great news!

    Feel free to update the wiki to add this info 🙂



  • @redalert11 Thank you, I can now add my AEOTEC Z-wave key to my jeedom VM.

    But this key doesn't appear in my debian 9 VM.

    On my server :

    lsusb
    Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0424:2514 Standard Microsystems Corp. USB 2.0 Hub
    Bus 003 Device 003: ID 0658:0200 Sigma Designs, Inc.
    Bus 005 Device 002: ID 10d5:5a08 Uni Class Technology Co., Ltd
    Bus 005 Device 003: ID 0624:0248 Avocent Corp. Virtual Hub
    Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
    Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
    Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
    Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
    Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
    Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
    

    Sigma Designs is my USB key I want in my VM.
    Thanks to @redalert11, I enable the passthroud in XC-ng center.
    I attach the Sigma Designs key to my Jeedom VM (under Debian 9)

    I start the VM.

    lsusb
    Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
    Bus 002 Device 002: ID 0627:0001 Adomax Technology Co., Ltd
    Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
    
    

    Sigma Designs is missing.
    Any Idea ? (tried with Debian 8, and Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, Windows 10 same problem).

    But no problem when I passthrough the same aeotec key on a Debian9 vm under vmware 😞



  • First, I want to say thanks to @fjen, @redalert11, and @FrCo for providing this information. It has certainly gotten me closer to USB pass through with a Linux VM.

    @FrCo or @redalert11: were either of you able to get your AEOTEC Z-wave 5 gen USB to show as a device in your guest VM?

    I followed the instructions above and was able to configure USB Pass through in XCP-ng Center, however in my CentOS 7.6 guest VM I only ever see the following devices:

    [root@centos7.6 ~]$ lsusb
    Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
    Bus 002 Device 002: ID 0627:0001 Adomax Technology Co., Ltd 
    Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
    

    I also checked dmesg and didn't find a single trace that it attempted to load the usb device.



  • Hello,
    I am Georg, and I am also new to XCP, kind of...at work, we have XEN, but sadly, thats not my business.

    Long story short, I got nearly everything sorted out, but not USB passthrough.
    I got all devices showing up in XCP-center, and attached them to the VM.

    When I start the VM, all USB devices are attached. But as soon as the VM is booting, the status "Attached" changes to "No".
    [VM -> Properties -> USB]

    However, what I found out: for example, I attach my keyboard and pass it to my Windows vm: then why I can control the local XEN console with this keyboard I passed through?

    And this error:
    "Failed","Starting VM 'Windows 10 (64-bit) (1)'
    Internal error: xenopsd internal error: Call to usb reset failed: Forkhelpers.Spawn_internal_error("usage: usb_reset.py attach [-h] -d DOMID -p PID [-r RESET_ONLY] device\nusb_reset.py attach: error: argument -r: expected one argument\n", "", _)
    Time: 00:00:23","xcp-ng","Jun 29, 2019 12:05 AM"



  • @kcah427 did you ever resolved this? I have the same result trying to pass a Conbee2 stick into an Ubuntu VM.



  • @axiom00

    I did a bit more research and determined that XCP-ng was passing the USB device through to the guest OS, although either didn't have the right drivers for my z-wave USB stick, or otherwise didn't know what to do with it; so it always just passed it to the guest as a root hub.

    I wasn't particularly interested in spending too much more time on it so I purchased the following PCI-E card and passed the whole controller through to the guest. That solved my problem and it has been working ever since.

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00JFR2H64/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o05_s00


  • XCP-ng Team

    That's a solution 😛



  • @kcah427 Thanks for sharing your solution. I end up using a Raspberry Pi as a Socat host and passing the USB Zigbee stick over ethernet to the VM. Not ideal but it works.



  • @kcah427 did you do anything special to pass through the USB card?

    I'm trying with a ASM1142 but can not boot the VM once it is assigned.

    Is there a particular reason why you chose the card that you used?

    Thanks.



  • Hi,

    I have XCP-NG 8.0 loaded onto an Intel NUC and I'm trying to pass a USB device through to a guest V.M. Although the setup using the CLI seems to go OK, the guest never sees the device. I've tried 2 different guests with no success

    Digging into the logs a bit more I found this:

    Feb 15 14:20:49 xcp-ng-bywirlgr qemu-dm-17[18527]: qemu-dm-17: Warning: speed mismatch trying to attach usb device "ConBee II" (full speed) to bus "ehci.0", port "1" (high speed)
    

    This seems to come from qemu-dp/hw/usb/bus.c:usb_check_attach() which sets the warning if the speed of the probed USB device is different to the speed of the emulated USB controller in the guest (at least that's what I think it does)

    Despite the fact that it is classed as a warning, it appears to abort the attachment of the device to the guest in qemu-dp/hw/usb/bus.c:usb_device_attach() if the warning has been generated.

    • is it possible to use one of the "xe vusb-param-*" commands to set the emulated USB bus to USB 1.x instead of 2.x (ehci)? I haven't been able to trace back where the bus is created yet

    • if not, is it possible to comment out that check and see what happens? To be honest, the check puzzles me. It is perfectly valid to plug a FULL speed (USB1.x) device into a HIGH speed (USB2.x) or SUPER speed (USB3.x) bus and have it work normally. There might be some magic have to happen at the port level to make it work, but it works just fine as the USB 1.x device I'm trying to use is plugged into a USB 2.x port on my NUC

    Any ideas?

    Thanks,

    Gary


  • XCP-ng Team

    Thanks for the feedback and interesting findings. I have really little knowledge about all this, so I can't answer your questions. Maybe @r1 will have partial answers. Else this is an area where, at short term, I hope that the community, step by step, gets closer to a solution that we could implement.



  • Hi,

    Thanks for the reply @stormi

    I've kind of hit a roadblock in my own probing so far. I was trying to figure out how the VUSB parameters got passed into qemu. The daemon.log shows it's run by forkexecd, but comparing the command of the same vm run with and without VUSB shows no real differences, so there must be a configuration file or other metadata being passed in with the VUSB passthrough configuration. I tried poking at the xenapi and quickly got lost in the ocaml code which I can't really read.

    I've also found that a VM with a VUSB attached cannot be snapshotted and backed up, which is really unfortunate. I'm not entirely sure why that restriction exists. Surely if the VM is rolled back to the snapshot then the system can treat it the same as if the USB device vanishes? It seems that the system removes the VUSB attachment if the device vanishes so I would have thought the same could be done from snapshots or backups?

    Thanks,

    Gary



  • Update: I haven't been able to figure out how to tell qemu to use a USB1.x interface instead of USB2.x (EHCI) which would let me pass the device through, but I've found a different work around. The device I'm trying to pass through appears as a USB serial device. After I stumbled upon a page mentioning that you could tie an emulated serial port to a TCP socket I dug further and found that you can do

    xe vm-param-add uuid=<uuid> param-name=platform hvm_serial=/dev/ttyACM0
    

    and hey presto your /dev/ttyS0 in the guest is now tied to the device on the hypervisor

    I may still poke around and try and find a better solution but for now my needs appear to be satisfied.



  • Bonus: I just tried and snapshot/backup still works with the serial port tied in that way


  • XCP-ng Team

    Nice workaround indeed!! Well done and thanks a lot for reporting your progress, that's essential for the whole community 🙂

    edit: start a chat with me, I'd like to send you some goodies 😉


Log in to reply
 

XCP-ng Pro Support