XCP-ng

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    XCP-ng 7.5.0 final is here

    Development
    15
    74
    21623
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambert
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder🦸 CEO 🧑‍💼 last edited by

      Hey guys!

      Just before the official announcement tomorrow, please double test our latest ISO: https://xcp-ng.org/7.5/xcp-ng-7.5.0.iso

      md5sum: 33adb5d92f56fe6cda0df047f2f60895

      Nothing really changed since RC1 (except very few stuff).

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
      • A
        Aleksander last edited by

        Congratulations to the whole team for the release of the new version XCP-NG 7.5.
        Great job.

        Aleksander

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • olivierlambert
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder🦸 CEO 🧑‍💼 last edited by

          Well, technically everything will be announced officially tomorrow 😉

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stormi
            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team 🚀 last edited by

            Also, don't use it now, it's broken (my fault!)

            D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              DustinB @stormi last edited by

              @stormi said in XCP-ng 7.5.0 final is here:

              Also, don't use it now, it's broken (my fault!)

              Yeah. . . "Error installing packages"

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambert
                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder🦸 CEO 🧑‍💼 last edited by

                Fixed, new ISO incoming!

                D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  DustinB @olivierlambert last edited by

                  @olivierlambert is the ISO link updated?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambert
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder🦸 CEO 🧑‍💼 last edited by

                    @stormi will tell you when it's up (with the new md5sum)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stormi
                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team 🚀 last edited by stormi

                      It's fixed at last! Same link as before, MD5SUM is c377ccc342bc9f0b96f02c66132c132a

                      There was a bug that was my fault (wrong product name in configuration files), but not the one about the installation failure actually. That one was dormant and already potentially present in XenServer installation ISOs too. There was some RPM that needed /bin/uname in a preinstallation script but in that version of the ISO, it got installed before the coreutils package that contains /bin/uname, so the script would fail and the installer display an error message. I fixed it by adding Requires(pre): coreutils to the package like it should always have been.

                      Further explanation: how can that happen?

                      Actually, when a package A requires another package B, it does not guarantee that B gets installed before A. They can be installed in the same transaction and then the order is undefined unless other dependencies are taken into account. That's what happened here. If A really needs B to be present so that it can be used in pre- or post-installation scriptlets, then one must specify it explicitly: Requires(pre): B or Requires(post): B.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • sriccio
                        sriccio last edited by

                        Awesome! Thanks a lot for your work. Can the update now be done via yum or it's advised to use the standard upgrade procedure (from 7.4.1).

                        Cheers,
                        Sébastien

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stormi
                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team 🚀 last edited by

                          It can be done via yum but we still consider it safer to use the ISO (because that kind of installation has been tested for a longer time, because it creates a back-up in the back-up partition...).

                          We'll give the yum upgrade procedure in the announcement.

                          sriccio 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • F
                            fraggan last edited by

                            Nice! that was fast 😄

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • sriccio
                              sriccio @stormi last edited by

                              @stormi Okay, crystal clear thanks.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • txsastre
                                txsastre last edited by

                                Thanks.

                                Gonna install it from scratch on the 3 develop servers.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • D
                                  dsiminiuk last edited by

                                  Used Rufus to install the ISO to USB.
                                  Booted, upgraded pool master from 7.4.
                                  Tried to migrate all running VMs from the 2nd host (server1) to the pool master (server2) to apply the upgrade to server1.
                                  2 VMs wouldn't migrate. Forcibly shutdown, now they are stuck as "Starting VM on server2..." not completing.
                                  1 VM can't start "The operation cannot be performed because the specified virtual disk could not be found."

                                  Upgrading from Xenserver 7.3 to XCP-ng 7.4 was cleaner.

                                  F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • olivierlambert
                                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder🦸 CEO 🧑‍💼 last edited by

                                    Double check your shared SR is connected on all host.

                                    D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • D
                                      dsiminiuk @olivierlambert last edited by

                                      @olivierlambert It is. Reconnecting all the SRs was the first thing you're presented with after the upgrade. Even the local filesystem and DVD needed to be repaired.

                                      After a reboot and a "PANIC on CPU 0", I did a cold shutdown. All VMs start now except the one that can't find the VDI, yet I can detach and reattach the VDI in XCP-ng Center.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • olivierlambert
                                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder🦸 CEO 🧑‍💼 last edited by

                                        😨 that's… strange. Could it be a hardware issue? Panic on a CPU is not commong.

                                        D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • G
                                          GregW last edited by

                                          This post is deleted!
                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • D
                                            dsiminiuk @olivierlambert last edited by

                                            @olivierlambert The VDIs are over shared ISCSI on FreeNAS VDEVs. There are other VMs with VDIs on the same RAID10 LUN that are running fine.

                                            It's actually 2 VDIs and I moved both (boot and swap) of the failed VM to an alternate RAID5 LUN and it made no difference.

                                            Is there a log I should be looking in to see more detail?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post