XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    703 Posts 67 Posters 1.1m Views 86 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormiS Offline
      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Ultra2D
      last edited by

      @Ultra2D In fact, you may be right, differing versions of those packages may cause an issue, because both hosts may behave differently regarding VMs that have no platform:device-id set.

      So another test to do would be install the update candidate for those packages on all hosts and restart their toolstack, then test migration of that VM again.

      U 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • U Offline
        Ultra2D @stormi
        last edited by

        @stormi Thanks. Installing the update candidate on all hosts and restarting the toolstack works, but only after power cycling the VM once.
        xcp-emu-manager is version 0.0.9-1

        Is it advisable to stay on the testing repo until the next version? There are some more non-Windows HVM VM's.

        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stormiS Offline
          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Ultra2D
          last edited by

          @Ultra2D so you mean that installing the updated packages would "break" the first migration of such a VM unless it's been rebooted once? If that is so, then I'd advise to revert to the previous version (or to make sure not to attempt a migration without power cycling the VMs once). Else, your choice. If the updated packages bring a benefit to you, you can keep them, else revert to the previous ones.

          U 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • U Offline
            Ultra2D @stormi
            last edited by

            @stormi I only tested with one VM. It crashed a couple of times when the pool master had updates from xcp-ng-updates_testing and the slaves had the updates that were released yesterday. After updating the last remaining slave to updates from xcp-ng-updates_testing, moving the VM resulted in a stuck VM. So I don't think you can draw any conclusions from this, except maybe that you should install the same version on master and slaves.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stormiS Offline
              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
              last edited by

              Xen security updates pushed to everyone (7.6 yesterday, 7.5 today).
              Blog post: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2019/03/12/xcp-ng-security-bulletin-vulnerabilities-pv-guests/

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C Offline
                codedmind
                last edited by

                I'm getting an error

                
                Running transaction test
                
                
                Transaction check error:
                  installing package xen-dom0-tools-4.7.6-6.4.1.xcpng.x86_64 needs 1 inodes on the /var/log filesystem
                
                
                stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stormiS Offline
                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @codedmind
                  last edited by

                  @codedmind This is probably related to a bug in the openvswitch package and log rotation. We sent a newsletter about it a few days ago: https://mailchi.mp/7ed52f9a2151/important-noticeopenvswitch-issue

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C Offline
                    codedmind
                    last edited by

                    Humm ok... but i cannot update... yes i have that version.. but as i cannot up date how can i solve it?

                    stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stormiS Offline
                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @codedmind
                      last edited by stormi

                      @codedmind when it got to the point that you ran out of inodes in /var/log, you need to remove some files before you can update. find /var/log -name ovsdb-server.log.*.gz -delete should work (untested, try without -delete first). Else look at the other threads that covered the subject.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C Offline
                        codedmind
                        last edited by

                        Ok thanks!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • R Offline
                          rechotech
                          last edited by rechotech

                          Does the openvswitch bug cause the local storage to fill up, or just the log file?
                          Would this openvwswitch potential lead our XCP server to crash?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stormiS Offline
                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                            last edited by stormi

                            Local storage is not touched. Only the /var/log partition, or the / partition if you have no /var/log partition. In the latter case, I suppose this could hang or crash the server. In the former case, it prevents some new tasks to be performed, but we haven't had reports of crashing servers at this stage.

                            R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • R Offline
                              rechotech @stormi
                              last edited by

                              since this is unlikely the cause of our crash, where would you suggest we look to determine why our xcp servers crashed a few days ago?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stormiS Offline
                                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                last edited by

                                I suggest opening a dedicated thread with as much information as possible.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stormiS Offline
                                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                  last edited by

                                  As a starting point, see https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/wiki/Logfiles and look for whatever happened by the time of the crashes, if logging was still operational at that moment.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stormiS Offline
                                    stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                    last edited by

                                    For XCP-ng 7.6 only

                                    New security update for the latest Intel CPU vulnerabilities:

                                    http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-297.html

                                    Install it with:

                                    yum update --enablerepo='xcp-ng-updates_testing' microcode_ctl-2.1-26.xs5.x86_64 xen-dom0-libs-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-dom0-tools-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-hypervisor-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-libs-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-tools-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64
                                    

                                    There's nothing fancy in the way the updates were built so no breakage is expected, but we still need feedback from early-adopters before we push them to everyone.

                                    Reboot required.

                                    Downgrade if needed with:

                                    yum downgrade microcode_ctl xen-dom0-libs xen-dom0-tools xen-hypervisor xen-libs xen-tools
                                    

                                    What to test:

                                    • basic functions of the hypervisor, VMs...

                                    Read the advisory carefully: installing the updates is not enough. There are other steps to be taken for complete protection.

                                    Citrix announcement: https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX251995

                                    M borzelB rizaemet 0R 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • U Offline
                                      Ultra2D
                                      last edited by

                                      @stormi said in Updates announcements and testing:

                                      yum update --enablerepo='xcp-ng-updates_testing' microcode_ctl-2.1-26.xs5.x86_64 xen-dom0-libs-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-dom0-tools-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-hypervisor-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-libs-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-tools-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64

                                      Should the pool master be updated first? Or it doesn't matter for there updates?

                                      stormiS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stormiS Offline
                                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Ultra2D
                                        last edited by stormi

                                        @Ultra2D Yes, always the pool master first.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stormiS Offline
                                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Ultra2D
                                          last edited by

                                          @Ultra2D Technically, some updates could be installed in any order, but it's safer and simpler to consider that master is always updated first.

                                          U 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • U Offline
                                            Ultra2D @stormi
                                            last edited by

                                            @stormi Sure, but I'd rather test on a pool member first if trying as an early adopter 😉 .

                                            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post