@lknite Hello, sorry if replying in this old thread looks odd... but I wanted to share that we are starting to work on supporting Cluster API. We have an internal proof of concept: /home/nathanael/Images/Captures d’écran/Capture d’écran du 2026-05-05 17-12-22.png[image: 1777999357100-a9596fde-e251-4996-8fc9-3f8e208f9f01-image.jpeg]

Xen Project covered this as XSA-489.

Thank you so much for your feedback, @Vagrantin !

Nice catch @vagrantin ! Feel free to open a new thread if you have other problems.

There's no small contributions, every one of them are great & welcome!

@yann Item Opened on Gitlab.

@olivierlambert said in Rust-based guest-tools... How are things going?: The thing is that it works very well and doesn't need fixes… I know, not usual right? It was so stable that we left it like that waiting for people coming for bugs and nothing happened… We'll cut a 1.0 in the next weeks/months. I have indeed seen the stability of it myself. But the lack of updates made me worry anyway. But I'm really looking forward to the promotion to 1.0 as well. Thanks!

My current findings regarding this: https://github.com/xcp-ng-rpms/microsemi-aacraid/issues/2 0nelight created this issue in xcp-ng-rpms/microsemi-aacraid open Microsemi Adaptec Series-8 Card not working in XCP-NG 8.3 #2

I had the same question but the responses here was amazing and the following blogpost nailed it. I hope it helps someone else too: https://techdirectarchive.com/2026/01/25/a-z-of-xcp-ng-and-xen-orchestra-setup-and-vm-creation/

I have no clue, I usually back it up with XO, its the one called "XO config & pool metadata backup" and only had to restore it once.

Hi according to gh, it looks like there is traction on this feature: https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp-ng-release/pull/53#discussion_r2642865515 So it might be merged soon... rzr opened this pull request in xcp-ng/xcp-ng-release closed s/c/e/profile.d/history.sh: Add timestamps to history #53

@exetico I have updated my script. Please use your previous install file (if you have it saved) to remove your previous version (remember to save your config before running uninstall), before you proceed to install the new version.

@Greg_E said in Building XCP-ng from source code: @olivierlambert Ok, thanks. Yes I'm eagerly awaiting XCP-ng 9 for testing. Hi, check this thread: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/11698/xcp-ng-9.0-demonstrator-early-preview More coming...

@dinhngtu Thanks. We plan to migrate all Windows VMs from the Citrix tools down the road and only have a handful of VMs running these so far so will maybe hold off until the next version. Have been running the Linux rust tools for over a year with zero issues..

Hello, Thanks for your work ! We have some hypervisors of tests at Gladhost, we can use them with pleasure to test your work on xcp-ng 8.3 ! Best regards

@m4rCsi Very nice, thanks for sharing the repo. We will defintely look carefully as we are also working on writing a XO CSI Driver. Ping @Cyrille

@bleader just checked the Excel assessment file I got from the security team. They used Crowdstrike (sensor is not installed on xcp-ng hosts). The funny thing is, the asset that it reports as vulnerable is the VM that is running XOA (official image provided by XCP-NG). It is deployed recently, so everything is up-to-date, but even then I don't understand how it reports the XOA VM as the one containing the vulnerabilities.

Hi, There is an issue and/or a PR (I don't remember where though) to have a specific extra file to manage user config without overwriting it. Until then, it will be overwritten after updates. @Team-XAPI-Network could provide the link to the issue (or PR?) and check to make it merged when possible

Hello everyone, I absolutely understand the point regarding datacenters. I am using xcp-ng for years in smaller - non datacenter - environments and its great. Therefore I added the nut packages (8.2 and 8.3) and it works like a charm. It's installation is well explained in: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/4300/performing-automated-shutdown-during-a-power-failure-using-a-usb-ups-with-nut-xcp-ng-8-2/13?_=1742229073030 However, I agree with @Kajetan321 that it would be great if the nut package could be included in the standard "updated" packages repo since its added quite some benefits (imho) for "smaller" IT environments. However, I do not know how much effort it takes to maintain that.