XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    703 Posts 67 Posters 1.1m Views 86 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormiS Offline
      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @codedmind
      last edited by

      codedmind This is probably related to a bug in the openvswitch package and log rotation. We sent a newsletter about it a few days ago: https://mailchi.mp/7ed52f9a2151/important-noticeopenvswitch-issue

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C Offline
        codedmind
        last edited by

        Humm ok... but i cannot update... yes i have that version.. but as i cannot up date how can i solve it?

        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stormiS Offline
          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @codedmind
          last edited by stormi

          codedmind when it got to the point that you ran out of inodes in /var/log, you need to remove some files before you can update. find /var/log -name ovsdb-server.log.*.gz -delete should work (untested, try without -delete first). Else look at the other threads that covered the subject.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C Offline
            codedmind
            last edited by

            Ok thanks!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R Offline
              rechotech
              last edited by rechotech

              Does the openvswitch bug cause the local storage to fill up, or just the log file?
              Would this openvwswitch potential lead our XCP server to crash?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stormiS Offline
                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                last edited by stormi

                Local storage is not touched. Only the /var/log partition, or the / partition if you have no /var/log partition. In the latter case, I suppose this could hang or crash the server. In the former case, it prevents some new tasks to be performed, but we haven't had reports of crashing servers at this stage.

                R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R Offline
                  rechotech @stormi
                  last edited by

                  since this is unlikely the cause of our crash, where would you suggest we look to determine why our xcp servers crashed a few days ago?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                    last edited by

                    I suggest opening a dedicated thread with as much information as possible.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stormiS Offline
                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                      last edited by

                      As a starting point, see https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/wiki/Logfiles and look for whatever happened by the time of the crashes, if logging was still operational at that moment.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stormiS Offline
                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                        last edited by

                        For XCP-ng 7.6 only

                        New security update for the latest Intel CPU vulnerabilities:

                        http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-297.html

                        Install it with:

                        yum update --enablerepo='xcp-ng-updates_testing' microcode_ctl-2.1-26.xs5.x86_64 xen-dom0-libs-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-dom0-tools-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-hypervisor-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-libs-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-tools-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64
                        

                        There's nothing fancy in the way the updates were built so no breakage is expected, but we still need feedback from early-adopters before we push them to everyone.

                        Reboot required.

                        Downgrade if needed with:

                        yum downgrade microcode_ctl xen-dom0-libs xen-dom0-tools xen-hypervisor xen-libs xen-tools
                        

                        What to test:

                        • basic functions of the hypervisor, VMs...

                        Read the advisory carefully: installing the updates is not enough. There are other steps to be taken for complete protection.

                        Citrix announcement: https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX251995

                        M borzelB rizaemet 0R 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • U Offline
                          Ultra2D
                          last edited by

                          stormi said in Updates announcements and testing:

                          yum update --enablerepo='xcp-ng-updates_testing' microcode_ctl-2.1-26.xs5.x86_64 xen-dom0-libs-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-dom0-tools-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-hypervisor-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-libs-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64 xen-tools-4.7.6-6.5.1.xcpng.x86_64

                          Should the pool master be updated first? Or it doesn't matter for there updates?

                          stormiS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stormiS Offline
                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Ultra2D
                            last edited by stormi

                            Ultra2D Yes, always the pool master first.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stormiS Offline
                              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Ultra2D
                              last edited by

                              Ultra2D Technically, some updates could be installed in any order, but it's safer and simpler to consider that master is always updated first.

                              U 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • U Offline
                                Ultra2D @stormi
                                last edited by

                                stormi Sure, but I'd rather test on a pool member first if trying as an early adopter 😉 .

                                stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stormiS Offline
                                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Ultra2D
                                  last edited by

                                  Ultra2D For this update, I think you could try with a slave first, since it's only an update of xen (and microcode_ctl), so I don't expect incompatibilities in pool management. But I wouldn't guarantee that cross-host operations such as migrations would work fine.

                                  U 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • U Offline
                                    Ultra2D @stormi
                                    last edited by

                                    stormi I'll try it on a master, no worries. But not on a Friday.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • borzelB Offline
                                      borzel XCP-ng Center Team @stormi
                                      last edited by

                                      stormi installed just now all latest patches from updates testing via yum on my testbox at work
                                      --> server bootet fine
                                      --> VMs bootet (Debian 9, Ubuntu 18.04, all PVHVM)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • stormiS Offline
                                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                        last edited by

                                        Upping this thread in the hope for more test results.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • rizaemet 0R Offline
                                          rizaemet 0 @stormi
                                          last edited by

                                          stormi installed on our pool hosts. Hosts boot normal. No vm boot issue Linux and Windows.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • stormiS Offline
                                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                            last edited by

                                            I have pushed the update to the updates repo. Security bulletin should follow shortly on the blog.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post