XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 7.6 RC1 available

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    71 Posts 12 Posters 45.0k Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormiS Offline
      stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
      last edited by

      7.6 has been released: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2018/10/31/xcp-ng-7-6/

      The migration issue that is being discussed here will be adressed by an update as soon as we have a fix.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • R Offline
        r1 XCP-ng Team
        last edited by

        Congratulations #TeamXCPNG

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • W Offline
          wayne @olivierlambert
          last edited by

          @olivierlambert how in the bloody hell could have happened that you released xcp-ng 7.6 with this bug? Also why not saying a word about it here https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2018/10/31/xcp-ng-7-6/?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierlambertO Online
            olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
            last edited by

            That's because the bug is likely already in 7.5, and we plan to patch it ASAP (next week?)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C Offline
              conradical
              last edited by

              just FYI, it is in 7.5 as well. Looking forward to the patch.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Online
                olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                Yeah, that's why we didn't stopped the release anyway. We got some trace and we continue to investigate right now. I hope we can have something this week.

                W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • W Offline
                  WBA
                  last edited by

                  I just upgraded from version 7.5 to 7.6 using yum upgrade, all seemed to go without error.
                  When I started to migrate our vm's from one of the 7.5 hosts to the new 7.6 host the vm's would be hung and unresponsive on the new host when the migration completed.
                  A forced stop and a fresh start of the VM brought the VMs back up.
                  After finding this post and seeing the notes about "xe-guest-utilities" I noticed that when I install the guest-tools the version remains the same, in fact the version remains at 7.4 looking at it in XCP-ng Center.
                  Optimized (version 7.4 installed)

                  This is what I see when I install guest-tools after migrating the VM to the 7.6 host.
                  root@# /mnt/Linux/install.sh
                  Detected `Debian GNU/Linux 9.5 (stretch)' (debian version 9).

                  The following changes will be made to this Virtual Machine:

                  • packages to be installed/upgraded:
                    • xe-guest-utilities_7.10.0-1_amd64.deb

                  Continue? [y/n] y

                  (Reading database ... 42324 files and directories currently installed.)
                  Preparing to unpack .../xe-guest-utilities_7.10.0-1_amd64.deb ...
                  Unpacking xe-guest-utilities (7.10.0-1) over (7.10.0-1) ...
                  Setting up xe-guest-utilities (7.10.0-1) ...
                  Processing triggers for systemd (232-25+deb9u4) ...

                  You should now reboot this Virtual Machine.
                  root@#

                  What is the correct version of guest-tools?
                  Are guest-tools not being updated because I have used yum to upgrade for the last 2 versions?
                  I should note these are 95% Linux VM's

                  Thanks, Will

                  stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @WBA
                    last edited by stormi

                    @WBA said in XCP-ng 7.6 RC1 available:

                    This is what I see when I install guest-tools after migrating the VM to the 7.6 host.
                    root@# /mnt/Linux/install.sh
                    Detected `Debian GNU/Linux 9.5 (stretch)' (debian version 9).

                    The following changes will be made to this Virtual Machine:

                    • packages to be installed/upgraded:
                      • xe-guest-utilities_7.10.0-1_amd64.deb

                    This is the correct version of the tools in XCP-ng 7.6 and is the same as in XCP-ng 7.5. It was 7.9.0 in 7.4.

                    Using yum to upgrade does give you the right version of the guest tools ISO.

                    So we need to find out why XCP-ng Center reports version 7.4.

                    Does anyone know how to check using xe in CLI to see if the wrong version number is reported by xapi directly or is coming from a bug in XCP-ng Center?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • W Offline
                      WBA
                      last edited by

                      This is what I see, not sure how that correlates to the correct tools build for 7.6

                      xe vm-param-get param-name=PV-drivers-version uuid=3a8a717f-c998-f05f-d096-f486a4990d1
                      major: 7; minor: 4; micro: 50; build: 1

                      Thx Will

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stormiS Offline
                        stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                        last edited by

                        I think the tools were built by XS before 7.5 was released and still carry the 7.4 version number, but they are the latest.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • W Offline
                          wayne @olivierlambert
                          last edited by

                          @olivierlambert honestly, my problem is that i was using 7.4 and i upgraded to 7.6, which made a perfectly stable pool pretty unstable.

                          It would have been really helpful to read a warning beforehand about this nasty bug which still exists in 7.6 as you were aware at that point.

                          AddeA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • AddeA Offline
                            Adde @wayne
                            last edited by

                            @wayne
                            https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/wiki/Upgrade-Howto#from-command-line
                            'know you're doing it at your own risk and be prepared to fix any issues that would arise, especially unforeseen upgrade issues'

                            //Adde

                            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stormiS Offline
                              stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @Adde
                              last edited by

                              @Adde Wayne's issues are not related to the update via yum, they're related to a bug in our replacement of the proprietary emu-manager (for which we'll release update candidates today).

                              AddeA W 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • AddeA Offline
                                Adde @stormi
                                last edited by Adde

                                @stormi

                                Aha Ok then I understand πŸ™‚
                                Sorry!!

                                @wayne
                                Sorry for that 😞

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • W Offline
                                  wayne @stormi
                                  last edited by

                                  @stormi my problem isn't the bug, there always be bugs.

                                  My problem is that there is no proper communication about it still. I think it is a serious issue about which you know before the 7.6 release as it was tested in rc phase apparently.

                                  It should have been mentioned when 7.6 was released, so anybody be aware what they're risking with upgrading.

                                  Anyhow, I'm glad that the fix is coming.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stormiS Offline
                                    stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                                    last edited by

                                    @wayne while it was found during the testing phase for 7.6, it was already present in 7.5 and hadn't been detected until late, so it let us assume that only few users were affected and that is was not worse to release 7.6 with it (and fix it fast) than it had been releasing 7.5 with it. We did not foresee that people still in 7.4 would skip 7.5 and discover the bug with 7.6.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stormiS Offline
                                      stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                                      last edited by

                                      That last comment is not intended as criticism of users who'd skip a release. It's just an explanation of why we thought it would not harm to release the 7.6 release as it was.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • C Offline
                                        conradical
                                        last edited by

                                        FYI The newly released xcp-emu-manager-0.0.6-2.x86_64.rpm has resolved the migration issues that i could produce.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stormiS Offline
                                          stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                                          last edited by

                                          Thanks, this is good news!

                                          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • C Offline
                                            conradical @stormi
                                            last edited by

                                            @stormi Yes it is!!

                                            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post