XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XO server loses pool and hosts momentarily, timeout error

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Management
    24 Posts 5 Posters 2.0k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F Offline
      felibb @felibb
      last edited by

      @felibb said in XO server loses pool and hosts momentarily, timeout error:

      upgrade my old XO to bookworm + latest commit in master

      Welp, that didn't help much, still seeing timeouts. Also neither XO nor XOA show the VM's own IP in the GUI anymore. dist-upgrade renamed interface from eth0 to etX0, and I had to edit /etc/network/interfaces to get the network back up, and I can connect, but GUI still says "No IP record". Management agent 8.0.50-1 detected, in case it matters.

      Fresh VM setup to be tested another day.

      F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • F Offline
        felibb @felibb
        last edited by

        (Replying to my previous post, a bit off-topic for the thread, but having installed https://github.com/xenserver/xe-guest-utilities/releases/tag/v8.4.0 manually, I see the IP in GUI now, but XOA says "Management agent 8.3.60-1 detected")

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • F Offline
          felibb
          last edited by felibb

          So I booted a pre-bookworm upgrade XO VM I had created earlier, moved its network to Management LAN, and installed 6444f88 (latest as of writing this). No timeouts anymore. Seems that Debian version doesn't matter here, and the code is fine (as we sort of determined already), but my networks are perhaps not routed fast enough for XO? It makes sense to put a mgmt appliance into the mgmt LAN, of course, however older code (that I tested, pre-bfb8d3b) did not have this issue. So maybe a combo of that new undici piece and slightly higher latency is causing it for me?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • olivierlambertO Offline
            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
            last edited by

            That's a great feedback @felibb , thanks!

            We'll try to dig on this to see if that lead takes us to something 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • First post
              Last post