XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Large "steal time" inside VMs but host CPU is not overloaded

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Compute
    22 Posts 4 Posters 1.5k Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • TeddyAstieT Online
      TeddyAstie Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team Xen Guru @lovvel
      last edited by

      @lovvel from a software standpoint, this is a 16 cores CPUs and AFAICT, Xen doesn't account for these slight differences between cores.

      As to be fair, it's not really easy to know in practice if a 3D-VCache core will be faster than a non-3D-VCache one for a specific case.

      L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • L Offline
        lovvel @TeddyAstie
        last edited by

        Thanks for your feedback, @TeddyAstie and @gecant . From your answers and the discussion in Non-server CPU compatibility - Ryzen and Intel I conclude, that the benefits of the 8 V-cache cores vs. the 8 turbo cores are just irrelevant. For XEN they are transparent and not really different in terms of performance. Hence, in a typical server environment we just let XEN randomly choose the cores and don't think about different "performance cores" that COULD be faster in specific applications like games.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • First post
          Last post