Not to be negative but in a professional environment auditors will trip on this. No one wants to explain to auditors that its plastered from upstream somewhere. Also itβs good for new hardware support. But good to hear work is progress.
Best posts made by xerxist
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback π
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback π
@xerxist said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta :
So which page do need to refer my auditor to for all the patching that is done once the kernel is EOL?
Just in case Iβve asked Lawerence on Youtube what his thoughts are on promoting EOL products to his clients
Latest posts made by xerxist
-
RE: MS-01 performance issues w/ Intel 226 NICs
Iβm good with the BIOS setting for my NUC11 and 13. I wish Intel would fix ASPM, but still not on the latest BIOS. Just canβt run xcp-ng yet because of the older kernel and passthrough issue on the NUC13.
It will probably come soon as 4.19 is out of support pretty soon. Was actually hoping there would be a alternate kernel for testing already.
-
RE: MS-01 performance issues w/ Intel 226 NICs
BIOS but if you dont have to option there you could use that.
-
RE: MS-01 performance issues w/ Intel 226 NICs
Good stuff
I wish I could use it but still waiting for them to start using a new kernel. As on the NUC13 I canβt use my igpu for passthrough on an old kernel. Need something above 5.15
-
RE: MS-01 performance issues w/ Intel 226 NICs
This is probably the same issue as I see on my NUC11 and NUC13.
Try turning off ASPM in the BIOS and see if you still have the same issue.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback π
That is not the point Iβm trying to make.
The heart of the OS is going to be end of life December this year. You can probably plaster away but you need to keep track of everything for cveβs etc.. if you donβt want an auditor to trip on this. As they will because itβs end of life. -
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback π
@xerxist said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta :
So which page do need to refer my auditor to for all the patching that is done once the kernel is EOL?
Just in case Iβve asked Lawerence on Youtube what his thoughts are on promoting EOL products to his clients
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback π
So which page do need to refer my auditor to for all the patching that is done once the kernel is EOL?
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback π
Not to be negative but in a professional environment auditors will trip on this. No one wants to explain to auditors that its plastered from upstream somewhere. Also itβs good for new hardware support. But good to hear work is progress.