XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.3m Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormiS Offline
      stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
      last edited by

      @ThierryC01 Is there a /etc/fstab.orig file on your system? If yes, does it contain the missing line about the ISO? And what's the output of rpm -q setup?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T Offline
        ThierryC01 @stormi
        last edited by

        @stormi Now that you mention that, I did perform an ISO upgrade I should not have performed would I known. Remember a few posts above. 😐 My bad...

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stormiS Offline
          stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @xerxist
          last edited by

          @xerxist said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta πŸš€:

          Which kernel are you looking at since 4.19 will be EOL in 9 months?

          So, the main blocker in the way to upgrade the kernel is a kernel module we use for storage access from the VMs. Work is being done to replace it, which will unlock the possibility to move to a newer kernel. Which version exactly will be chosen in due time. Likely a LTS kernel.

          Meanwhile, XCP-ng 8.3 remains on 4.19, on which we'll continue to provide security fixes for vulnerabilities that may affect it in the context of dom0.

          X R 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • X Offline
            xerxist @stormi
            last edited by

            @stormi

            Thanks for the explanation.
            Will this be added like what there is now as an alternative kernel?

            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stormiS Offline
              stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @xerxist
              last edited by

              @xerxist Possibly, but then only some storage drivers will work with it. This will mainly be for testing purposes and gathering feedback.

              X 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • X Offline
                xerxist @stormi
                last edited by xerxist

                @stormi

                Not to be negative but in a professional environment auditors will trip on this. No one wants to explain to auditors that its plastered from upstream somewhere. Also it’s good for new hardware support. But good to hear work is progress. πŸ‘πŸΌ

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
                • G Offline
                  gb.123
                  last edited by gb.123

                  USB Passthrough Testing & Feedback :

                  Tested 2 Devices :-

                  1. 16 GB USB Flash Drive - Transcend
                    Results : Works Perfectly

                  2. ePass2003 Token (for Digital Signatures)
                    Results : Not Detected (See update)

                  Deep Diving :
                  lsusb & usb-devices commands list the device (vendor id - 096e) on console (cli). However, the device is not shown in the 'Advanced' tab of the node/host.

                  Maybe devices getting filtered only for USB Media / Flash Drive in Xen Orchestra ?

                  Update :
                  Token also works now after editing : /etc/xensource/usb-policy.conf
                  as enumerated here.

                  Thanks to @olivierlambert for the above link and prompt guidance!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    Probably not in the white list of device type. Read https://docs.xcp-ng.org/compute/#️-usb-passthrough for more details.

                    G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • G Offline
                      gb.123 @olivierlambert
                      last edited by gb.123

                      @olivierlambert

                      Thanks for the prompt reply !

                      You are right. The device was filtered. I am now removing from filter and re-testing.

                      Update: Re-tested and everything seems to work fine.
                      I will further try to use the signature device to see if it actually works inside the VM.

                      PS: I see no reason to filter tokens by default. Can we remove the DENY line for smartcards by default ?
                      We also need to add : DENY: Class=03 subclass=00 prot=00 # HID
                      as this class is used by some MSI motherboards for HID. Since rest of the HID are filtered, this should be added too for consistency sake.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • X Offline
                        xerxist @stormi
                        last edited by

                        @stormi

                        So which page do need to refer my auditor to for all the patching that is done once the kernel is EOL?

                        X ajpri1998A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • G Offline
                          gb.123 @olivierlambert
                          last edited by

                          @olivierlambert

                          In continuation of my previous post, I also noticed that any changes to /etc/xensource/usb-policy.conf are reverted in case of updates. I also notices this reverting in case of restart (but need to confirm this after thorough testing as it may be one-time senario)

                          B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • B Offline
                            bufanda @gb.123
                            last edited by

                            @gb-123 In case of restart I never had it reverted only in case of update. After an update I just run an ansible playbook to add my whitelist entries again. sure it's a work around and some include file like usb-policy.conf.d/*conf would be nice to have.

                            G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • G Offline
                              gb.123 @bufanda
                              last edited by

                              @bufanda

                              It reverted for me once in case of re-start but that has not happened the second time. That's why reported it as 'one-time' scenario.

                              I agree having usb-policy.conf.d/*conf would be nice to have.

                              For workaround, I am working on a script to over-write /etc/xensource/usb-policy.conf on every reboot (should take care of the updates as well). This is a crude way of doing it but this is just meant as a workaround rather than a long term solution which is adding the conf in something like usb-policy.conf.d/*conf as you mentioned.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • G Offline
                                gb.123
                                last edited by

                                @olivierlambert @stormi

                                Any way to get the UUID of the Host using CLI ?
                                What I mean is not the list of hosts using xe host-list params=uuid but I only want to get the host uuid of the host on which the command is being run on.

                                Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Tristis OrisT Offline
                                  Tristis Oris Top contributor @gb.123
                                  last edited by

                                  @gb-123 cat /etc/xensource-inventory | grep -i installation_uuid

                                  G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • G Offline
                                    gb.123 @Tristis Oris
                                    last edited by

                                    @Tristis-Oris Thanks a Lot!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • G Offline
                                      gb.123
                                      last edited by

                                      For everyone who needs to ensure usb-policy.conf remains intact after update/reboot, I have posted a workaround script here.

                                      Please note this is a workaround script only till a better implementation is done by the xcp-ng team.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • X Offline
                                        xerxist @xerxist
                                        last edited by

                                        @xerxist said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta πŸš€:

                                        @stormi

                                        So which page do need to refer my auditor to for all the patching that is done once the kernel is EOL?

                                        Just in case I’ve asked Lawerence on Youtube what his thoughts are on promoting EOL products to his clients

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -2
                                        • ajpri1998A Offline
                                          ajpri1998 @xerxist
                                          last edited by

                                          @xerxist

                                          https://xcp-ng.org/docs/releases.html#all-releases

                                          Latest LTS: XCP-ng 8.2
                                          
                                          Using the Long Term Support version is relevant if:
                                          
                                              you want to be sure the system will stay stable
                                              you want to **have all security fixes** without doing major upgrades every year
                                              you want a predictable migration path on a longer timeframe
                                              you don't care about new features coming for the next years
                                          
                                          LTS releases are supported for 5 years.
                                          

                                          XCP-ng 8.2 still has about a year and 3 months left of support.

                                          X 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • X Offline
                                            xerxist @ajpri1998
                                            last edited by

                                            @ajpri1998

                                            That is not the point I’m trying to make.
                                            The heart of the OS is going to be end of life December this year. You can probably plaster away but you need to keep track of everything for cve’s etc.. if you don’t want an auditor to trip on this. As they will because it’s end of life.

                                            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post