XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. xerxist
    3. Posts
    X
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 0
    • Posts 24
    • Groups 0

    Posts

    Recent Best Controversial
    • RE: MS-01 performance issues w/ Intel 226 NICs

      Andrew

      I’m good with the BIOS setting for my NUC11 and 13. I wish Intel would fix ASPM, but still not on the latest BIOS. Just can’t run xcp-ng yet because of the older kernel and passthrough issue on the NUC13.

      It will probably come soon as 4.19 is out of support pretty soon. Was actually hoping there would be a alternate kernel for testing already.

      posted in Hardware
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: MS-01 performance issues w/ Intel 226 NICs

      cowboy

      Just got 2 new ones. 2,5Gbit from TP-Link Omada SG3210X-M2.

      Working pretty good.

      posted in Hardware
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: MS-01 performance issues w/ Intel 226 NICs

      Andrew

      BIOS but if you dont have to option there you could use that.

      posted in Hardware
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: MS-01 performance issues w/ Intel 226 NICs

      cowboy

      Good stuff πŸ‘πŸΌ

      I wish I could use it but still waiting for them to start using a new kernel. As on the NUC13 I can’t use my igpu for passthrough on an old kernel. Need something above 5.15

      posted in Hardware
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: Intel iGPU passthough

      CJ

      No output just need the Intel quick sync.

      posted in Hardware
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: MS-01 performance issues w/ Intel 226 NICs

      cowboy

      This is probably the same issue as I see on my NUC11 and NUC13.

      Try turning off ASPM in the BIOS and see if you still have the same issue.

      posted in Hardware
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€

      ajpri1998

      That is not the point I’m trying to make.
      The heart of the OS is going to be end of life December this year. You can probably plaster away but you need to keep track of everything for cve’s etc.. if you don’t want an auditor to trip on this. As they will because it’s end of life.

      posted in News
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€

      xerxist said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta πŸš€:

      stormi

      So which page do need to refer my auditor to for all the patching that is done once the kernel is EOL?

      Just in case I’ve asked Lawerence on Youtube what his thoughts are on promoting EOL products to his clients

      posted in News
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€

      stormi

      So which page do need to refer my auditor to for all the patching that is done once the kernel is EOL?

      posted in News
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€

      stormi

      Not to be negative but in a professional environment auditors will trip on this. No one wants to explain to auditors that its plastered from upstream somewhere. Also it’s good for new hardware support. But good to hear work is progress. πŸ‘πŸΌ

      posted in News
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€

      stormi

      Thanks for the explanation.
      Will this be added like what there is now as an alternative kernel?

      posted in News
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€

      stormi

      Which kernel are you looking at since 4.19 will be EOL in 9 months?

      posted in News
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€

      stormi

      πŸ‘ŒπŸΌπŸ˜ƒπŸš€

      It seems it would fix my iGPU passthrough issue with the NUC13 πŸ™‚

      posted in News
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€

      Any reason why xcp-ng is focussing on back porting kernel drivers and fixes to an old kernel instead of using a newer kernel and porting back in what is needed for xcp-ng?

      posted in News
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: Intel iGPU passthough

      bullerwins

      Yes I'm running 8.3 Beta

      posted in Hardware
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: Intel iGPU passthough

      bullerwins

      Not in the VM itself.
      I even went to kernel 6.6 and try it in there, all give the same issue.

      Something on the hypervisor side in the kernel I meant. This is 4.x something with allot of backports.

      I'll probably just wait a wile before moving full XCP-NG.
      But its a very nice system πŸ‘

      posted in Hardware
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: Intel iGPU passthough

      bullerwins

      Seems you would need at least Kernel > 5.15 for this to work on the NUC 12-13.
      Not sure what got implemented/fixed there but it would need to be back ported for this to work.

      posted in Hardware
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: Intel iGPU passthough

      NUC13 is still a no go with ASPM turned off.

      Not sure if the kernel needs to recognize it as it doesn't give me the type like on the NUC11

      4e3231e4-61e9-4101-abbb-ae2f90fdbd2f-image.png

      But the NUC11 is confirmed working fine BIOS or UEFI

      posted in Hardware
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: Intel iGPU passthough

      tjkreidl

      Strange it works on UEFI too now.
      Only thing that changed is "ASPM off" in the BIOS of the NUC.
      Need to try that too on the NUC 13.

      posted in Hardware
      X
      xerxist
    • RE: Intel iGPU passthough

      Got it working !!!!! πŸ™‚

      Changed the VM from UEFI to BIOS and it started working.

      55120676-0c12-46cb-bdb3-7a986113f5c1-image.png

      Still though why would it need it be BIOS instead of UEFI

      Need to do some more testing as I also disabled something in the BIOS of the NUC11 for ASPM to so I'll bring up another VM with UEFI and test it again.

      posted in Hardware
      X
      xerxist