XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. ScarfAntennae
    S
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 7
    • Posts 19
    • Groups 0

    ScarfAntennae

    @ScarfAntennae

    0
    Reputation
    2
    Profile views
    19
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined
    Last Online

    ScarfAntennae Unfollow Follow

    Latest posts made by ScarfAntennae

    • Just an idea :) - (SATA controller passthrough)

      Hey, since I'm running TrueNAS virtualized, I wanted to passthrough the SATA controller.

      This led me to a journey of updating to 8.3, just so I could do it through xen orchestra, which I did. After I toggled the controller, the system restarted and all of a sudden xcp-ng didn't want to boot. It was stuck in the dracut emergency shell.

      I had absolutely no idea why, until I realized the system itself is on a SATA SSD, and not an m.2 drive.

      I had to manually change the grub config for it to be able to boot to the main config again, which was a bit stressful.

      Anyways, my idea, just adding a little popup warning, or something similar that this could happen if users have xcp-ng installed on a SATA drive, just to prevent future headaches for homelabbers such as myself, but in reality, it could happen to anyone.

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      ScarfAntennae
    • RE: Xen Orchestra Prometheus Backup Metrics?

      Good things take time.
      Your team is doing god's work.
      Remember to stay healthy, in both mind and body!

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      ScarfAntennae
    • RE: Xen Orchestra Prometheus Backup Metrics?

      Got it, thanks!
      I'm certain many if not all enterprise users would be interested in such a feature.

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      ScarfAntennae
    • RE: Xen Orchestra Prometheus Backup Metrics?

      @olivierlambert That's where my question comes in 🙂

      Any plans on having these exposed for monitoring in Grafana?

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      ScarfAntennae
    • RE: Xen Orchestra Prometheus Backup Metrics?

      @olivierlambert Could you confirm please if netdata provides such metrics? ^

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      ScarfAntennae
    • RE: Xen Orchestra Prometheus Backup Metrics?

      @olivierlambert Just to confirm, I want to look at the size of daily backups created by Xen Orchestra, and the time/speed it took for them to complete, basically this page, but on a graph:

      bc14db46-c12d-44b0-b5b4-a2d4c83b4126-image.png

      I'm not sure that is something netdata can offer?

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      ScarfAntennae
    • Xen Orchestra Prometheus Backup Metrics?

      Any plans on having these exposed for monitoring in Grafana?

      I would really much like to see a graph which would correlate backup length, backup size, per VM, per Job, etc.

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      ScarfAntennae
    • cleanVm: incorrect backup size in metadata
       cleanVm: incorrect backup size in metadata
      
          path
          "/xo-vm-backups/db8b6e5f-6e3a-e919-f5c1-d097f46eb259/20240321T000510Z.json"
          actual
          21861989376
          expected
          21861989888
      

      e62efac1-bea2-4547-808c-e653f2636126-image.png

      I've been having this warning for 3~ months, on all my VMs.
      At first the difference was just a few bytes (if those are bytes), but now the difference seems to be growing.

      Running XO from the sources, updated multiple times during those 3 months, and also updated yesterday, same warning still occurred during last night's backup.

      Any ideas how to get rid of this?

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      ScarfAntennae
    • NDB Connections per Disk?

      Hi,

      I do not understand what this setting does.

      To tailor the backup process to your specific needs and infrastructure, you can adjust the number of NBD connections per exported disk. This setting is accessible in the Advanced backup job section and allows for further customization to optimize performance according to your network conditions and backup requirements:
      

      More connections = faster backup? What's the trade-off?

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      S
      ScarfAntennae
    • RE: Error: Connection refused (calling connect ) (XCP-ng toolstack hang on boot)

      @olivierlambert I do.

      I have also noticed something extremely weird.

      I have 3 HDDs attached to one host.
      2x2TB raid 1 (software raid done on the XCP-ng host)
      1x4TB

      lsblk shows:

      ... SNIP ...
      sda                                                             8:0    0   1.8T  0 disk
      ├─sda2                                                          8:2    0   1.8T  0 part
      └─sda1                                                          8:1    0     2G  0 part
      ...
      sdb                                                             8:16   0   1.8T  0 disk
      ├─sdb2                                                          8:18   0   1.8T  0 part
      └─sdb1                                                          8:17   0     2G  0 part
        └─md127                                                       9:127  0     2G  0 raid1
      ...
      sde                                                             8:64   0   3.7T  0 disk
      ├─sde2                                                          8:66   0   3.7T  0 part
      └─sde1                                                          8:65   0     2G  0 part
        └─md127                                                       9:127  0     2G  0 raid1
      

      All 3 disks are passed through to a TrueNAS VM on the host, and all the data is properly stored, but I have no idea why mdadm shows that the 4TB disk is part of the raid, instead of the other one?

      /dev/md127:
                 Version : 1.2
           Creation Time : Sun Aug 27 14:32:08 2023
              Raid Level : raid1
              Array Size : 2094080 (2045.00 MiB 2144.34 MB)
           Used Dev Size : 2094080 (2045.00 MiB 2144.34 MB)
            Raid Devices : 2
           Total Devices : 2
             Persistence : Superblock is persistent
      
             Update Time : Sun Oct  8 12:07:28 2023
                   State : clean
          Active Devices : 2
         Working Devices : 2
          Failed Devices : 0
           Spare Devices : 0
      
      Consistency Policy : resync
      
                    Name : november:swap0
                    UUID : ae045fa0:74b00896:3134ede5:c837bec3
                  Events : 27
      
          Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
             0       8       65        0      active sync   /dev/sde1
             1       8       17        1      active sync   /dev/sdb1
      

      Anyways, this doesn't seem to be the issue, since the other host which has no HDDs attached, only m.2 VM SR's, and it also took exactly 10 minutes for the toolstack to go up.

      Now XO can't reach any of the hosts, even though all the VMs are up.

      posted in XCP-ng
      S
      ScarfAntennae