XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Andi79
    A
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 2
    • Posts 29
    • Groups 0

    Andi79

    @Andi79

    3
    Reputation
    1
    Profile views
    29
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined
    Last Online

    Andi79 Unfollow Follow

    Best posts made by Andi79

    • RE: XCP-NG vm's extremly slow

      @olivierlambert

      just wanted to tell the possible end of the story.... if anyone here ever has an simelar problem :-).

      Currently it looks like that the Fan caused vibrations on the case that where transmitted to the hdd nearby.... the hdd is an SMR harddisk that seems to have problems with such vibrations.... that caused the problems on server1.

      server2 had an nfs connection to a vds on server1. When IO was going to 100% because of the hdd error on server1 it caused exactly the same behavior on server2 (no idea why) even when there are no physical disk problems on this device.

      Overall no XCP-NG problem, but such strange that it's hard to imagine what could cause this at the beginning :).

      posted in Compute
      A
      Andi79
    • RE: XCP-NG vm's extremly slow

      @fohdeesha lol :-). ok.... good to now :). Next optimization by decoupling harddisks and fans.... and always be quite on the datacenter :).

      posted in Compute
      A
      Andi79
    • RE: XCP-NG vm's extremly slow

      @olivierlambert
      only the 4TB hdd. i also have testet it on the other dom0, there it's quicker. Maybe it's related because there are some running rsyncs on a virtual machine to this disk.

      posted in Compute
      A
      Andi79

    Latest posts made by Andi79

    • RE: can't delete snapshop - This operation cannot be performed because the system does not manage this VDI

      @olivierlambert

      how can i start it manually? As far as I understand GC starts in a case of an SR Scan, but when I do this it restores the forgotten vdi.

      1aa.png

      in some way it seems to be linked as basecopy snapshot to an active vm vdi.
      If i try to rename it it says no sch VDI, VDI-Snapshot with it's uuid

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      A
      Andi79
    • RE: can't delete snapshop - This operation cannot be performed because the system does not manage this VDI

      @olivierlambert
      ok, not 100% success.

      after running the vdi-forget it does not work to free up the space after clicking reclaim freed space. And when I rescan the vdi it appears again.

      is there any risk when i delete this lv directly by lvremove

      --- Logical volume ---
      LV Path                /dev/VG_XenStorage-c29b2189-edf2-8349-d964-381431c48be1/VHD-80304704-a164-4fe3-bc15-c776b2d4cc2b
      LV Name                VHD-80304704-a164-4fe3-bc15-c776b2d4cc2b
      VG Name                VG_XenStorage-c29b2189-edf2-8349-d964-381431c48be1
      LV UUID                glbGl8-UhKX-AxHV-0YJm-hy8e-sIe6-kNU2tZ
      LV Write Access        read only
      LV Creation host, time host2-neu, 2022-06-16 18:29:45 +0200
      LV Status              available
      # open                 1
      LV Size                <190,35 GiB
      Current LE             48729
      Segments               1
      Allocation             inherit
      Read ahead sectors     auto
      - currently set to     256
      Block device           252:2
      
      posted in Xen Orchestra
      A
      Andi79
    • RE: can't delete snapshop - This operation cannot be performed because the system does not manage this VDI

      @olivierlambert

      i had success with a vdi-forget. thanks

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      A
      Andi79
    • can't delete snapshop - This operation cannot be performed because the system does not manage this VDI

      I have problems on deleting an VM snapshot. it seems that it it's linked to a active VDI of a VM, but when i try to delete it in XOA nothing happens. I tried to delete it on CLI with that result:

      #xe vdi-destroy uuid=80304704-a164-4fe3-bc15-c776b2d4cc2b
      This operation cannot be performed because the system does not manage this VDI
      vdi: 80304704-a164-4fe3-bc15-c776b2d4cc2b (vm-test-disk)
      
      #xe vdi-list
      uuid ( RO)                : 80304704-a164-4fe3-bc15-c776b2d4cc2b
      name-label ( RW): vm-test-disk
      name-description ( RW): 
      sr-uuid ( RO): c29b2189-edf2-8349-d964-381431c48be1
      virtual-size ( RO): 214748364800
      sharable ( RO): false
      read-only ( RO): true
      

      Any idea how I can delete this snapshot?

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      A
      Andi79
    • RE: XCP-NG vm's extremly slow

      @fohdeesha lol :-). ok.... good to now :). Next optimization by decoupling harddisks and fans.... and always be quite on the datacenter :).

      posted in Compute
      A
      Andi79
    • RE: XCP-NG vm's extremly slow

      @olivierlambert

      just wanted to tell the possible end of the story.... if anyone here ever has an simelar problem :-).

      Currently it looks like that the Fan caused vibrations on the case that where transmitted to the hdd nearby.... the hdd is an SMR harddisk that seems to have problems with such vibrations.... that caused the problems on server1.

      server2 had an nfs connection to a vds on server1. When IO was going to 100% because of the hdd error on server1 it caused exactly the same behavior on server2 (no idea why) even when there are no physical disk problems on this device.

      Overall no XCP-NG problem, but such strange that it's hard to imagine what could cause this at the beginning :).

      posted in Compute
      A
      Andi79
    • RE: XCP-NG vm's extremly slow

      actually it looks like that the 4TB on Server 1 really has hardware problems.... and the reason why there was the same effect on the other dom is that there was an mounted NFS Share of an machine on the first server..... and the disk errors on this machine where "transfered" to the other dom with the same affects (delaying the whole system).

      I'm currently migrating all VMs von server1 to server2. I really hope that is the
      solution for all. Currently rsync is not running on any machine... i will test this later when the VMs are transfered.

      posted in Compute
      A
      Andi79
    • RE: XCP-NG vm's extremly slow

      latenz.png

      reported by munin on the slow VM. xvda has a latency ok 100ms. The problem occurs when there are many small file request like rsync does... and 100ms in sum is a lot. Any idea how I could debug the reason for this?

      posted in Compute
      A
      Andi79
    • RE: XCP-NG vm's extremly slow

      @fohdeesha

      perhaps this helps.

      dom0

      mpstat -P ALL
      Linux 4.19.0+1 (klartext1) 	16.06.2022 	_x86_64_	(12 CPU)
      
      12:00:43     CPU    %usr   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft  %steal  %guest  %gnice   %idle
      12:00:43     all    0,58    0,00    0,89    0,03    0,00    0,37    0,39    0,00    0,00   97,74
      12:00:43       0    0,57    0,00    1,14    0,02    0,00    1,50    0,38    0,00    0,00   96,39
      12:00:43       1    0,58    0,00    0,85    0,06    0,00    0,07    0,40    0,00    0,00   98,04
      12:00:43       2    0,57    0,00    0,85    0,04    0,00    0,11    0,39    0,00    0,00   98,03
      12:00:43       3    0,57    0,00    0,85    0,02    0,00    0,26    0,39    0,00    0,00   97,91
      12:00:43       4    0,55    0,00    0,86    0,02    0,00    0,49    0,38    0,00    0,00   97,69
      12:00:43       5    0,61    0,00    0,88    0,03    0,00    0,17    0,39    0,00    0,00   97,91
      12:00:43       6    0,60    0,00    0,94    0,03    0,00    0,92    0,40    0,00    0,00   97,11
      12:00:43       7    0,56    0,00    0,84    0,02    0,00    0,05    0,40    0,00    0,00   98,13
      12:00:43       8    0,56    0,00    0,84    0,02    0,00    0,29    0,40    0,00    0,00   97,89
      12:00:43       9    0,57    0,00    0,84    0,02    0,00    0,15    0,40    0,00    0,00   98,03
      12:00:43      10    0,56    0,00    0,85    0,02    0,00    0,33    0,40    0,00    0,00   97,83
      12:00:43      11    0,63    0,00    0,91    0,02    0,00    0,09    0,40    0,00    0,00   97,94
      
      

      vm1:

      mpstat -P ALL
      Linux 5.15.0-37-generic (backup1) 	16.06.2022 	_x86_64_	(12 CPU)
      
      10:02:33     CPU    %usr   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft  %steal  %guest  %gnice   %idle
      10:02:33     all    0,16    0,01    0,06   28,98    0,00    0,03    0,05    0,00    0,00   70,72
      10:02:33       0    0,08    0,01    0,02   12,98    0,00    0,00    0,01    0,00    0,00   86,89
      10:02:33       1    0,30    0,02    0,09   42,83    0,00    0,00    0,02    0,00    0,00   56,74
      10:02:33       2    0,18    0,01    0,07   32,57    0,00    0,00    0,02    0,00    0,00   67,15
      10:02:33       3    0,20    0,01    0,09   47,56    0,00    0,04    0,08    0,00    0,00   52,01
      10:02:33       4    0,16    0,01    0,05   28,91    0,00    0,00    0,01    0,00    0,00   70,85
      10:02:33       5    0,14    0,01    0,04   20,90    0,00    0,00    0,01    0,00    0,00   78,90
      10:02:33       6    0,16    0,02    0,04   22,59    0,00    0,00    0,03    0,00    0,00   77,17
      10:02:33       7    0,08    0,01    0,03   17,02    0,00    0,00    0,01    0,00    0,00   82,85
      10:02:33       8    0,08    0,00    0,03   17,85    0,00    0,00    0,01    0,00    0,00   82,02
      10:02:33       9    0,09    0,01    0,04   18,09    0,00    0,00    0,03    0,00    0,00   81,74
      10:02:33      10    0,31    0,01    0,13   47,49    0,00    0,26    0,37    0,00    0,00   51,43
      10:02:33      11    0,12    0,01    0,05   39,03    0,00    0,00    0,02    0,00    0,00   60,76
      
      

      very high io wait.... but low usr that should be higher because of running rsyncs on user level

      posted in Compute
      A
      Andi79
    • RE: XCP-NG vm's extremly slow

      @fred974 they have 6 - 10GB Ram, but it's not memory related. It's some kind of strange IO Problem that blocks the whole VM that must be some combination of things. The VMs worked without any problems on other hosts, but the Host itself doesn't have any problems (and because there are 2 of them hardware problems are very unlikley).

      posted in Compute
      A
      Andi79