Posts made by vit-zikmund

Hello @olivierlambert, I've put a comment to the issue. Was it what you expected? The issue itself seemed rather abandoned and nothing moved there since the comment. Is that to be expected? I don't want to sound disrespectful, I know all this is best-effort, but you react surprisingly often! Just want to make sure I didn't miss anything. Some of the changes I suggested I could maybe hand over in a (lame) PR, if such an effort would be appreciated.

Oh, thanks @olivierlambert, there indeed is such an issue: https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/issues/3915

In the meantime I scratched together a little oneliner to figure out the right number:

SR='sr-name-label=<sr-name-label>'  # or SR='sr-uuid=<sr-uuid>'
xe vdi-list "$SR" is-a-snapshot=false params=virtual-size | grep '[^[:space:]]' | sed 's/[^:]*: //' | awk '{s+=$1} END {print s/1024/1024/1024 " GiB"}'

It ignores snapshots, but that's OK for me.

Anyways, I'll try following up in the issue. Thanks again

etlweather created this issue in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

open Show allocated space on SR #3915

Hello great gurus of XCP-ng and XO!

Today I got myself into a "little" trouble by accidentally overcommitting my thin provisioned SR, because I falsely believed there's enough space for the theoreticaly-full VDIs I was migrating into it. While that eventually succeeded, later some VDIs grew and the whole space got depleted, and so the VMs ended up with a ro filesystems

Call me gullible, but I did so because I believed (for reasons I blame myself) this little green graph shows the sum of VDI sizes and not the real filesystem allocation.

Take e.g. the VDI I hovered over - kube-demo01-worker03, where it shows 12.32 GiB. When I switch to the "Disks" tab, I see its size to be 100 GiB:

I think that it's nice to be able to see what's the real allocation sum of the thin provisioned VDIs, but I believe I also need to know when I will overcommit the space when adding more VDIs. A sum of the VDI full sizes would be a big help, but I haven't found it. Did I miss it somewhere? If not, could that be possibly added? I hope we could elaborate on how.

Thanks!
Vit Zikmund