@stormi Tested the new edk package at looks good to me. was able to reboot linux and freebsd VMs without a hitch with UEFI boot mode.
Best posts made by bufanda
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
Updated my Lab pool consisting of 2 Nodes this morning
Rebooted master first, then slave. No issues VMs migrated between reboots.
Couldn't see any issue til now. -
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
Installed on my usual lab setup works fine so far although I have the "Fell back to full backup" message for qcow2 VMs
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
Upgraded my usual pool. VM migrations during reboot worked without issues. So far everything works
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
@stormi Installed on two node Pool. Both nodes are HP EliteDesk 800 G3 Miini. 10 Linux VMs with Secure Boot enabled and 1 Windows Server 2019 with SecureBoot and vTPM enabled. No issues. Migration between nodes worked flawlessly too.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
@dthenot Only have 2 Test VMs currently not running with qcow2. Nothing production and nothing crucial. It's a lab pool. As I said just to understand the behavior when I test the new updates. But thanks for the details. Really appreciated
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
Installed on my Test pool with 2 HP EliteDesk 800 G3 mini. Except the no stats in XenOrchestra. Did some VM migragration between hosts, reboot testes (only Linux VMs though) and so far no issues.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
Upgraded my dev Pool
2 HP EliteDesk 800 G3 Mini
One with i5 6500T and one i7 6700T
Both 32GB RAM, SATA and NVMe Storage
1x Intel NIC
1x RTL8139 NICUpdated Master first and then the second node. No issues so far.
-
RE: Hosts compatibility
@wtdrisco There should be no Problem if the core counts don't match. you just can't place a VM that has 32vCPUs on the 24 core host.
But one thing you should have equal over all hosts is the amount of network interfaces and also have them configured equally (which should be done by XOA/XO form sources). Otherwise a VM might not migrate because a network Interface is missing on the target host.
Also passed through hardware might prevent migrating to another host.
I run a pool with two diffrent hosts, one has 8 Cores and one only 4 cores, also one has 64 GB RAM and the other one has only 32GB and in this limitations I can easily migrate VMs back and forth between hosts.
-
RE: Automating VM builds on XO with Redhat AAP (Ansible)
@Murf There is a blog post about using XenOrchestra for a dynamic inventory.
https://xen-orchestra.com/blog/virtops3-ansible-with-xen-orchestra/Creating VMs is usually a job done by terraform and not ansible. I know there is an ansible collection for VMWare which can do that but as far as I know there is no collection that is able to manage VMs and sadly Satellite's virt-who doesn't seem to have XenOrchestra support at the moment and since RedHat is pushing OpenShift I don't think it will ever come.
But there was a wish for a colletion on the DevOps Megathread
https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/88993
Latest posts made by bufanda
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
@stormi installed updates. Did some backups and VM migrations between various storages (bad and qcow2) looks good so far.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
@bufanda I'm being told it's expected to have it the first time after the update, but in theory the next ones should be not be fulls. Can you try?
Just checked and the VM I was testing with was part of two backups and it seems that when one runs and the second starts that it will fall back. I removed the VM now from one backup and with being only member of one backup job it looks good then. Will keep an eye on it.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
@acebmxer purge snapshots is active since I created the backup job over a year ago. I always enable purge snapshots on backup jobs.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
Installed on my usual lab setup works fine so far although I have the "Fell back to full backup" message for qcow2 VMs
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
Upgraded my usual pool. VM migrations during reboot worked without issues. So far everything works
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
@stormi Installed on two node Pool. Both nodes are HP EliteDesk 800 G3 Miini. 10 Linux VMs with Secure Boot enabled and 1 Windows Server 2019 with SecureBoot and vTPM enabled. No issues. Migration between nodes worked flawlessly too.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
@gduperrey Installed on my Lab-Pool with teo HP EliteDesk 800 G3's no issues during and after upgrade. migration, creating, and deleteing of VMs wihtout issues too.
-
RE: DevOps Megathread: what you need and how we can help!
@sid I made that request a while ago, and tried to look into myself too, but the current API of XenOrchestra just doesn't support it, there are many pieces missing from what I could see. I hope with XenOrchestra 6 the API wil support it though.
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
Installed on a 2 Node pool consisting of 2
HP EliteDesk 300 G3 Mini with- 1x i7 6700T & 1x i5 6500T
- 32GB RAM each
- NFS VM SR
- iSCSI VM SR
- various SMB ISO SR
VMs migrated during reboot withput issues, also no issues with migration after updates completed with all nodes rebooted. Alos no issues found with VMs. Primarily AlmaLinux 9 and FreeBSD 13.
-
RE: cleanVm: incorrect backup size in metadata
@noritaka971 You sure it does always a full backup. I have this isuue for ages and looking at the backup protocols it's only doing the deltas, never a full backup when not supposed to.