XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    VDI export to VMDK results in a corrupted disk

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Xen Orchestra
    15 Posts 3 Posters 144 Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A Offline
      abudef
      last edited by abudef

      I tried to export 3 VDIs from 2 different XCP-ng pools. 2 VDIs from Windows Server 2025 VMs and 1 from Windows Server 2022 VM. All 3 VMDKs seem to be corrupted when I try to use them in VMware Workstation.

      I also tried reimporting 1 of the exported VMDKs back into the XCP-ng repository and the VM booted without any issue using the reimported VDI.

      Maybe there is either an issue with this VMDK format in VMware Workstation or the XOΒ΄s export/import method creates VMDK files that can be exported and reimport back into XCP-ng repository while preserving the original state of the VDI in the XCP-ng repository even if itΒ΄s unusable in VMware WS.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • poddingueP poddingue marked this topic as a question
      • A Offline
        abudef
        last edited by

        2a23be37-665b-4827-896a-a20545061b00-image.jpeg

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DanpD Offline
          Danp Pro Support Team
          last edited by

          Have you attempted to analyze the exported file using qemu-img?
          For example:

          qemu-img info file.vmdk
          qemu-img check file.vmdk
          
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A Offline
            abudef
            last edited by abudef

            qemu-img.exe info Windows Server 2025.vmdk
            image: Windows Server 2025.vmdk
            file format: vmdk
            virtual size: 64G (68719476736 bytes)
            disk size: 64G
            cluster_size: 65536
            Format specific information:
                cid: 2849992906
                parent cid: 4294967295
                create type: streamOptimized
                extents:
                    [0]:
                        compressed: true
                        virtual size: 68719476736
                        filename: Windows Server 2025.vmdk
                        cluster size: 65536
                        format:
            
            qemu-img.exe check Windows Server 2025.vmdk
            No errors were found on the image.
            

            It seems that the disk itself is formally OK, but the content is somehow corrupted.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DanpD Offline
              Danp Pro Support Team
              last edited by

              It's possible that the issue lies within VMware Workstation. 🀷

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Offline
                abudef
                last edited by

                I don't think it's a VMware issue. If the XO export created a VMDK with incorrect data block contents, qemu-img check can still complete without reporting any errors. It only means that it did not find any problems with the VMDK structure.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A Offline
                  abudef
                  last edited by

                  IΒ΄m not a developer so I asked Ai what it "thinks" about it...

                  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                  β”‚  XCP-ng VDI β”‚
                  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                         β”‚
                         β”‚ VDI_exportContent()
                         β”‚ format = VDI_FORMAT_VHD
                         β–Ό
                  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                  β”‚    VHD stream    β”‚
                  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                           β”‚
                           β”‚ vhdToVMDK()
                           β–Ό
                  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                  β”‚  vhdToVMDKIterator()    β”‚
                  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                              β”‚
                              β”‚ parseVhdToBlocks()
                              β–Ό
                  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                  β”‚    parseVhdStream()     β”‚
                  β”‚                         β”‚
                  β”‚    VHD blocks           β”‚
                  β”‚    { id, data }         β”‚
                  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                              β”‚
                              β”‚ onlyBlocks()
                              β”‚
                              β”‚ lba = id * blockSize
                              β–Ό
                  ══════════════════════════════════════════
                       POSSIBLE ERROR HERE
                       Incorrect mapping of id ↔ data
                       or incorrect block ordering
                  ══════════════════════════════════════════
                              β”‚
                              β–Ό
                  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                  β”‚   generateVmdkData()    β”‚
                  β”‚                         β”‚
                  β”‚   VHD block             β”‚
                  β”‚      ↓                  β”‚
                  β”‚   grainData             β”‚
                  β”‚      ↓                  β”‚
                  β”‚   createMarkedGrain()   β”‚
                  β”‚      ↓                  β”‚
                  β”‚   tableBuffer           β”‚
                  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                              β”‚
                              β–Ό
                  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                  β”‚   VMDK stream    β”‚
                  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                           β”‚
                           β–Ό
                  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                  β”‚    VMDK file     β”‚
                  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                  
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A Offline
                    abudef
                    last edited by abudef

                    Ah, I see it now. What XO exports is the streamOptimized format, which is used in OVAs for transfer. Such a standalone VMDK cannot be used directly and needs to be converted for both VMware Workstation and ESXi 🀦 , or you can use the OVA import, which performs the conversion automatically.

                    So before such a VMDK can be attached to a VMware VM, it needs to be converted to monolithicSparse e.g.:

                    qemu-img.exe convert -p -f vmdk -O vmdk -o subformat=monolithicSparse WS25.vmdk WS25-2.vmdk
                    
                    Emmanuel VE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A abudef has marked this topic as solved
                    • A Offline
                      abudef
                      last edited by

                      So in the end, I think the best approach is to export the VHD and convert it, because the conversion has to be done anyway, and the native VHD export is faster.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Emmanuel VE Offline
                        Emmanuel V Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @abudef
                        last edited by

                        It might be worth adding a message in XO at export, or in the documentation ?

                        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A Offline
                          abudef @Emmanuel V
                          last edited by

                          @Emmanuel-V In my opinion, it would make more sense if a standalone disk exported in VMDK format were exported directly as monolithicSparse, so that it would not need to be converted. This makes more sense to me because when only the disk is exported, rather than the entire VM (OVA), it can be assumed that the disk will be attached directly to some VM.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better πŸ’—

                          Register Login
                          • First post
                            Last post