Testing ZFS with XCP-ng

olivierlambert

How's the performance?

borzel

Currently hundred of gigabytes gets transfered

I switched xenorchestra from the VM to our hardware backup server, so we can use the 10Gbit cards. (The VM run iperf about 1,6 Gbit/s, the hardware at around 6 GBit/s.)

The data flow is:
NFS-Storage(ZFS) -> XenServer -> XO -> XCP-ng (ZFS), all connected over 10GBit Ethernet.

I did not measure correct numbers, was just impressed and happy that it runs

~~I will try to express my data and meanings more detailed later...~~

Setup

0_1530657646909_f6ca6db4-cd16-44bf-9db4-8dacfe3be0df-grafik.png

Settings

Alle servers are connected via 10GBit ethernet cards (Emulex OnConnect)
Xen1 and Xen2 are a pool, Xen1 is master
XenOrchestra connects per http:// (no SSL to improve speed)
DOM0 has 8GB RAM on XCP-ng AiO (so ZFS does use 4GB)

Numbers

iperf between Backupserver and XCP-ng AiO: ~6 GBit's
Transfer speed of Continous Replication Job from Xen-Pool to XCP-ng AiO (output of zpool iostat with 30 seconds sample rate on XCP-ng AiO)

0_1530658170537_7044bd63-39c3-4f93-aa3f-e97a596b6f26-grafik.png

The speed varies a bit because of lz4 compression, current Compress Ratio: 1.64x

Here a quick look at the graphs (on XCP-ng AiO)

0_1530658863169_485d9208-50d8-4051-9853-762e8e02c201-grafik.png

and a quick look at top (on XCP-ng AiO)

0_1530659073283_c3c22e43-e039-4ddf-8d7c-f4700d37f9ff-grafik.png

and arcstat.py (sample rate 1sec) (on XCP-ng AiO)

0_1530659347665_97dd73d9-2d83-4c6b-a57b-d8d5528e4b74-grafik.png

and arc_summary.py (on XCP-ng AiO)

0_1530659545510_0c723c27-1666-4943-992c-c203c79178a5-grafik.png

@olivierlambert I hope you can see somehting with these numbers

borzel

To avoid the problem with XenOrchestra runing as VM (and not using the full 10GBit of the host) I would install it directly inside DOM0. It could be preinstalled in XCP-ng as WEB-Gui

Maybe I try this later on my AiO Server ...

olivierlambert

Not a good idea to embed XO inside Dom0… (also it will cause issue if you have multiple XOs, it's meat to run at one place only).

That's why the virtual appliance is better

borzel

@olivierlambert My biggest Question: Why is this not a good Idea?

How do big datacenters solve the issue with the performance? Just install on Hardware? With virtual Appliance you are limited to GBit speed.

I run more than one XO's, one for Backups and one for Useraccess. Don't want users on my Backupserver.

Maybe this is something for a separat thread...

olivierlambert

VM speed is not limited to GBit speed. XO proxies will deal with big infrastructures to avoid bottlenecks.

borzel

@olivierlambert ah, ok

borzel

I did a little more testing with ZFS, tried to move a disk from localpool to srpool

Setup

XCP-ng on single 500Gb disk, ZFS-Pool created on a separat partition on that disk (~420GB) -> localpool -> SR named localzfs
ZFS-Pool on 4 x 500GB Disks (Raid10) -> srpool -> SR named sr1

Error

0_1530972133820_4eefffb1-2464-4985-a46d-da41cc6403b3-grafik.png

Output of /var/log/SMLog

 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] ['uuidgen', '-r']
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282]   pread SUCCESS
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/4c47f4b0-2504-fe56-085c-1ffe2269ddea/sr
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] lock: acquired /var/lock/sm/4c47f4b0-2504-fe56-085c-1ffe2269ddea/sr
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] vdi_create {'sr_uuid': '4c47f4b0-2504-fe56-085c-1ffe2269ddea', 'subtask_of':      'DummyRef:|62abb588-91e6-46d7-8c89-a1be48c843bd|VDI.create', 'vdi_type': 'system', 'args': ['10737418240', 'xo-os', '', '', 'false', '19700101T00:00:00Z', '', 'false'], 'o_direct': False, 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRef:ada301d3-f232-3421-527a-d511fd63f8c6', 'session_ref': 'OpaqueRef:02edf603-3cdf-444a-af75-1fb0a8d71216', 'device_config': {'SRmaster': 'true', 'location': '/mnt/srpool/sr1'}, 'command': 'vdi_create', 'sr_ref': 'OpaqueRef:0c8c4688-d402-4329-a99b-6273401246ec', 'vdi_sm_config': {}}
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] ['/usr/sbin/td-util', 'create', 'vhd', '10240', '/var/run/sr-mount/4c47f4b0-2504-fe56-085c-1ffe2269ddea/11a040ba-53fd-4119-80b3-7ea5a7e134c6.vhd']
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282]   pread SUCCESS
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] ['/usr/sbin/td-util', 'query', 'vhd', '-v', '/var/run/sr-mount/4c47f4b0-2504-fe56-085c-     1ffe2269ddea/11a040ba-53fd-4119-80b3-7ea5a7e134c6.vhd']
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282]   pread SUCCESS
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] lock: released /var/lock/sm/4c47f4b0-2504-fe56-085c-1ffe2269ddea/sr
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] lock: closed /var/lock/sm/4c47f4b0-2504-fe56-085c-1ffe2269ddea/sr
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] lock: acquired /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] ['/usr/sbin/td-util', 'query', 'vhd', '-vpfb', '/var/run/sr-mount/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0.vhd']
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311]   pread SUCCESS
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] vdi_attach {'sr_uuid': '319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|b0cce7fa-75bb-4677-981a-4383e5fe1487|VDI.attach', 'vdi_ref': 'OpaqueRef:9daa47a5-1cae-40c2-b62e-88a767f38877', 'vdi_on_boot': 'persist', 'args': ['false'], 'o_direct': False, 'vdi_location': 'ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0', 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRef:ada301d3-f232-3421-527a-d511fd63f8c6', 'session_ref': 'OpaqueRef:a27b0e88-cebe-41a7-bc0c-ae0eb46dd011', 'device_config': {'SRmaster': 'true', 'location': '/localpool/sr'}, 'command': 'vdi_attach', 'vdi_allow_caching': 'false', 'sr_ref': 'OpaqueRef:e4d0225c-1737-4496-8701-86a7f7ac18c1', 'vdi_uuid': 'ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0'}
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0/vdi
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] result: {'o_direct_reason': 'SR_NOT_SUPPORTED', 'params': '/dev/sm/backend/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0', 'o_direct': True, 'xenstore_data': {'scsi/0x12/0x80': 'AIAAEmNhODhmOGRjLTRhYjYtNGIgIA==', 'scsi/0x12/0x83': 'AIMAMQIBAC1YRU5TUkMgIGNhODhmOGRjLTRhYjYtNGJlNy05MDg0LTFiNDFjYmM4YzFjMCA=', 'vdi-uuid': 'ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0', 'mem-pool': '319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154'}}
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] lock: closed /var/lock/sm/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0/vdi
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] lock: released /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
 Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] lock: closed /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
 Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
 Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] lock: acquired /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
 Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] ['/usr/sbin/td-util', 'query', 'vhd', '-vpfb', '/var/run/sr-mount/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0.vhd']
 Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337]   pread SUCCESS
 Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] lock: released /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
 Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] vdi_activate {'sr_uuid': '319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|1f6f53c2-0d1e-462c-aeea-5d109e55d44f|VDI.activate', 'vdi_ref': 'OpaqueRef:9daa47a5-1cae-40c2-b62e-88a767f38877', 'vdi_on_boot': 'persist', 'args': ['false'], 'o_direct': False, 'vdi_location': 'ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0', 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRef:ada301d3-f232-3421-527a-d511fd63f8c6', 'session_ref': 'OpaqueRef:392bd2b6-2a84-48ca-96f1-fe0bdaa96f20', 'device_config': {'SRmaster': 'true', 'location': '/localpool/sr'}, 'command': 'vdi_activate', 'vdi_allow_caching': 'false', 'sr_ref': 'OpaqueRef:e4d0225c-1737-4496-8701-86a7f7ac18c1', 'vdi_uuid': 'ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0'}
 Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0/vdi
 Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] blktap2.activate
 Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] lock: acquired /var/lock/sm/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0/vdi
 Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] Adding tag to: ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0
 Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] Activate lock succeeded
 Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
 Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] ['/usr/sbin/td-util', 'query', 'vhd', '-vpfb', '/var/run/sr-mount/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0.vhd']
 Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337]   pread SUCCESS

borzel

@borzel said in Testing ZFS with XCP-ng:

Jul 7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] result: {'o_direct_reason': 'SR_NOT_SUPPORTED',

Did find it after posting this and looking onto it... is this a known thing?

nraynaud

that's weird: https://github.com/xapi-project/sm/blob/master/drivers/blktap2.py#L1002

I don't even know how my tests did work before.

olivierlambert

Maybe because it wasn't triggered without a VDI live migration?

borzel

~~did no livemigration ...just local copy of a vm~~
... ah, I should read before I answer ...

borzel

~~@nraynaud Is there any info how to build blktap2 myself to test with my homelab?~~
I did find it here: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/122/how-to-build-blktap-from-sources/3

borzel

I tested the updated version of blktap and build it like described in https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/1677, but copying a vm within the SR fails

Async.VM.copy R:f286a572f8aa|xapi] Error in safe_clone_disks: Server_error(VDI_COPY_FAILED, [ End_of_file ])

borzel

the function safe_clone_disks is located in https://github.com/xapi-project/xen-api/blob/72a9a2d6826e9e39d30fab0d6420de6a0dcc0dc5/ocaml/xapi/xapi_vm_clone.ml#L139

it calls clone_single_vdi in https://github.com/xapi-project/xen-api/blob/72a9a2d6826e9e39d30fab0d6420de6a0dcc0dc5/ocaml/xapi/xapi_vm_clone.ml#L116

which calls Client.Async.VDI.copy from a XAPI-OCaml Module Client which I can not find

borzel

found something in /var/log/SMlog

Jul 21 19:52:40 xen SM: [17060] result: {'o_direct_reason': 'SR_NOT_SUPPORTED', 'params': '/dev/sm/backend
/4c8bc619-98bd-9342-85fe-1ea4782c0cf2/8e901c80-0ead-4764-b3d9-b04b4376e4c4',
'o_direct': True, 'xenstore_data': {'scsi/0x12/0x80': 'AIAAEjhlOTAxYzgwLTBlYWQtNDcgIA==', 'scsi/0x12/0x83': 
'AIMAMQIBAC1YRU5TUkMgIDhlOTAxYzgwLTBlYWQtNDc2NC1iM2Q5LWIwNGI0Mzc2ZTRjNCA=', 'vdi-uuid': 
'8e901c80-0ead-4764-b3d9-b04b4376e4c4', 'mem-pool': '4c8bc619-98bd-9342-85fe-1ea4782c0cf2'}}

Note the 'o_direct': True in this log entry. But I created the SR with other-config:o_direct=false

stormi

@borzel I'll let @nraynaud have a say, but first, to be sure, you built it with

xcp-build --build-local . --define 'xcp_ng_section extras'

and the resulting RPM contains .extras in its name?

borzel

yes, I did Checked it multiple times. Will check it again today to be 100% sure.

I also saw the right logoutput from @nraynaud new function where he probes the open with O_DIRECT and retries with O_DSYNC.

I have the "feel" that xapi or blktap copy's files in some situations without it's normal way. Maybe a special "file copy" without a open command?

Can I attach a debugger to blktap while in operration? This would also be needed for deep support of the whole server.

stormi

You can probably attach gdb to a running blktap, yes. Install the blktap-debuginfo package that was produced when you built blktap to make debug symbols available.

nraynaud

@borzel there is something fishy around here https://github.com/xapi-project/sm/blob/master/drivers/blktap2.py#L994 I am still unsure what to do.

I have not removed O_DIRECT everywhere in blktap, I was expecting to remove the remainder by the o_direct flag in python, but I guess I was wrong. we might patch the python.