XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Testing ZFS with XCP-ng

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    80 Posts 10 Posters 58.9k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      VM speed is not limited to GBit speed. XO proxies will deal with big infrastructures to avoid bottlenecks.

      borzelB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • borzelB Offline
        borzel XCP-ng Center Team @olivierlambert
        last edited by

        @olivierlambert ah, ok 🙂

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • borzelB Offline
          borzel XCP-ng Center Team
          last edited by borzel

          I did a little more testing with ZFS, tried to move a disk from localpool to srpool

          Setup

          • XCP-ng on single 500Gb disk, ZFS-Pool created on a separat partition on that disk (~420GB) -> localpool -> SR named localzfs
          • ZFS-Pool on 4 x 500GB Disks (Raid10) -> srpool -> SR named sr1

          Error

          0_1530972133820_4eefffb1-2464-4985-a46d-da41cc6403b3-grafik.png

          Output of /var/log/SMLog

           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] ['uuidgen', '-r']
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282]   pread SUCCESS
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/4c47f4b0-2504-fe56-085c-1ffe2269ddea/sr
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] lock: acquired /var/lock/sm/4c47f4b0-2504-fe56-085c-1ffe2269ddea/sr
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] vdi_create {'sr_uuid': '4c47f4b0-2504-fe56-085c-1ffe2269ddea', 'subtask_of':      'DummyRef:|62abb588-91e6-46d7-8c89-a1be48c843bd|VDI.create', 'vdi_type': 'system', 'args': ['10737418240', 'xo-os', '', '', 'false', '19700101T00:00:00Z', '', 'false'], 'o_direct': False, 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRef:ada301d3-f232-3421-527a-d511fd63f8c6', 'session_ref': 'OpaqueRef:02edf603-3cdf-444a-af75-1fb0a8d71216', 'device_config': {'SRmaster': 'true', 'location': '/mnt/srpool/sr1'}, 'command': 'vdi_create', 'sr_ref': 'OpaqueRef:0c8c4688-d402-4329-a99b-6273401246ec', 'vdi_sm_config': {}}
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] ['/usr/sbin/td-util', 'create', 'vhd', '10240', '/var/run/sr-mount/4c47f4b0-2504-fe56-085c-1ffe2269ddea/11a040ba-53fd-4119-80b3-7ea5a7e134c6.vhd']
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282]   pread SUCCESS
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] ['/usr/sbin/td-util', 'query', 'vhd', '-v', '/var/run/sr-mount/4c47f4b0-2504-fe56-085c-     1ffe2269ddea/11a040ba-53fd-4119-80b3-7ea5a7e134c6.vhd']
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282]   pread SUCCESS
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] lock: released /var/lock/sm/4c47f4b0-2504-fe56-085c-1ffe2269ddea/sr
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28282] lock: closed /var/lock/sm/4c47f4b0-2504-fe56-085c-1ffe2269ddea/sr
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] lock: acquired /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] ['/usr/sbin/td-util', 'query', 'vhd', '-vpfb', '/var/run/sr-mount/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0.vhd']
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311]   pread SUCCESS
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] vdi_attach {'sr_uuid': '319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|b0cce7fa-75bb-4677-981a-4383e5fe1487|VDI.attach', 'vdi_ref': 'OpaqueRef:9daa47a5-1cae-40c2-b62e-88a767f38877', 'vdi_on_boot': 'persist', 'args': ['false'], 'o_direct': False, 'vdi_location': 'ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0', 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRef:ada301d3-f232-3421-527a-d511fd63f8c6', 'session_ref': 'OpaqueRef:a27b0e88-cebe-41a7-bc0c-ae0eb46dd011', 'device_config': {'SRmaster': 'true', 'location': '/localpool/sr'}, 'command': 'vdi_attach', 'vdi_allow_caching': 'false', 'sr_ref': 'OpaqueRef:e4d0225c-1737-4496-8701-86a7f7ac18c1', 'vdi_uuid': 'ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0'}
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0/vdi
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] result: {'o_direct_reason': 'SR_NOT_SUPPORTED', 'params': '/dev/sm/backend/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0', 'o_direct': True, 'xenstore_data': {'scsi/0x12/0x80': 'AIAAEmNhODhmOGRjLTRhYjYtNGIgIA==', 'scsi/0x12/0x83': 'AIMAMQIBAC1YRU5TUkMgIGNhODhmOGRjLTRhYjYtNGJlNy05MDg0LTFiNDFjYmM4YzFjMCA=', 'vdi-uuid': 'ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0', 'mem-pool': '319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154'}}
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] lock: closed /var/lock/sm/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0/vdi
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] lock: released /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
           Jul  7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] lock: closed /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
           Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
           Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] lock: acquired /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
           Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] ['/usr/sbin/td-util', 'query', 'vhd', '-vpfb', '/var/run/sr-mount/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0.vhd']
           Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337]   pread SUCCESS
           Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] lock: released /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
           Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] vdi_activate {'sr_uuid': '319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|1f6f53c2-0d1e-462c-aeea-5d109e55d44f|VDI.activate', 'vdi_ref': 'OpaqueRef:9daa47a5-1cae-40c2-b62e-88a767f38877', 'vdi_on_boot': 'persist', 'args': ['false'], 'o_direct': False, 'vdi_location': 'ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0', 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRef:ada301d3-f232-3421-527a-d511fd63f8c6', 'session_ref': 'OpaqueRef:392bd2b6-2a84-48ca-96f1-fe0bdaa96f20', 'device_config': {'SRmaster': 'true', 'location': '/localpool/sr'}, 'command': 'vdi_activate', 'vdi_allow_caching': 'false', 'sr_ref': 'OpaqueRef:e4d0225c-1737-4496-8701-86a7f7ac18c1', 'vdi_uuid': 'ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0'}
           Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0/vdi
           Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] blktap2.activate
           Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] lock: acquired /var/lock/sm/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0/vdi
           Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] Adding tag to: ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0
           Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] Activate lock succeeded
           Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/sr
           Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337] ['/usr/sbin/td-util', 'query', 'vhd', '-vpfb', '/var/run/sr-mount/319aebee-24f0-8232-0d9e-ad42a75d8154/ca88f8dc-4ab6-4be7-9084-1b41cbc8c1c0.vhd']
           Jul  7 15:44:08 xen SM: [28337]   pread SUCCESS
          
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • borzelB Offline
            borzel XCP-ng Center Team
            last edited by

            @borzel said in Testing ZFS with XCP-ng:

            Jul 7 15:44:07 xen SM: [28311] result: {'o_direct_reason': 'SR_NOT_SUPPORTED',

            Did find it after posting this and looking onto it... is this a known thing?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • nraynaudN Offline
              nraynaud XCP-ng Team
              last edited by

              that's weird: https://github.com/xapi-project/sm/blob/master/drivers/blktap2.py#L1002

              I don't even know how my tests did work before.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                Maybe because it wasn't triggered without a VDI live migration?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • borzelB Offline
                  borzel XCP-ng Center Team
                  last edited by borzel

                  did no livemigration ...just local copy of a vm
                  ... ah, I should read before I answer ...

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • borzelB Offline
                    borzel XCP-ng Center Team
                    last edited by borzel

                    @nraynaud Is there any info how to build blktap2 myself to test with my homelab?
                    I did find it here: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/122/how-to-build-blktap-from-sources/3

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • borzelB Offline
                      borzel XCP-ng Center Team
                      last edited by borzel

                      I tested the updated version of blktap and build it like described in https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/1677, but copying a vm within the SR fails 😞

                      Async.VM.copy R:f286a572f8aa|xapi] Error in safe_clone_disks: Server_error(VDI_COPY_FAILED, [ End_of_file ])
                      
                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • borzelB Offline
                        borzel XCP-ng Center Team
                        last edited by borzel

                        the function safe_clone_disks is located in https://github.com/xapi-project/xen-api/blob/72a9a2d6826e9e39d30fab0d6420de6a0dcc0dc5/ocaml/xapi/xapi_vm_clone.ml#L139

                        it calls clone_single_vdi in https://github.com/xapi-project/xen-api/blob/72a9a2d6826e9e39d30fab0d6420de6a0dcc0dc5/ocaml/xapi/xapi_vm_clone.ml#L116

                        which calls Client.Async.VDI.copy from a XAPI-OCaml Module Client which I can not find 😞

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • borzelB Offline
                          borzel XCP-ng Center Team
                          last edited by borzel

                          found something in /var/log/SMlog

                          Jul 21 19:52:40 xen SM: [17060] result: {'o_direct_reason': 'SR_NOT_SUPPORTED', 'params': '/dev/sm/backend
                          /4c8bc619-98bd-9342-85fe-1ea4782c0cf2/8e901c80-0ead-4764-b3d9-b04b4376e4c4',
                          'o_direct': True, 'xenstore_data': {'scsi/0x12/0x80': 'AIAAEjhlOTAxYzgwLTBlYWQtNDcgIA==', 'scsi/0x12/0x83': 
                          'AIMAMQIBAC1YRU5TUkMgIDhlOTAxYzgwLTBlYWQtNDc2NC1iM2Q5LWIwNGI0Mzc2ZTRjNCA=', 'vdi-uuid': 
                          '8e901c80-0ead-4764-b3d9-b04b4376e4c4', 'mem-pool': '4c8bc619-98bd-9342-85fe-1ea4782c0cf2'}}
                          

                          Note the 'o_direct': True in this log entry. But I created the SR with other-config:o_direct=false

                          stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stormiS Offline
                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @borzel
                            last edited by

                            @borzel I'll let @nraynaud have a say, but first, to be sure, you built it with

                            xcp-build --build-local . --define 'xcp_ng_section extras'
                            

                            and the resulting RPM contains .extras in its name?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • borzelB Offline
                              borzel XCP-ng Center Team
                              last edited by borzel

                              yes, I did 🙂 Checked it multiple times. Will check it again today to be 100% sure.

                              I also saw the right logoutput from @nraynaud new function where he probes the open with O_DIRECT and retries with O_DSYNC.

                              I have the "feel" that xapi or blktap copy's files in some situations without it's normal way. Maybe a special "file copy" without a open command?

                              Can I attach a debugger to blktap while in operration? This would also be needed for deep support of the whole server.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stormiS Offline
                                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                last edited by

                                You can probably attach gdb to a running blktap, yes. Install the blktap-debuginfo package that was produced when you built blktap to make debug symbols available.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • nraynaudN Offline
                                  nraynaud XCP-ng Team
                                  last edited by

                                  @borzel there is something fishy around here https://github.com/xapi-project/sm/blob/master/drivers/blktap2.py#L994 I am still unsure what to do.

                                  I have not removed O_DIRECT everywhere in blktap, I was expecting to remove the remainder by the o_direct flag in python, but I guess I was wrong. we might patch the python.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • borzelB Offline
                                    borzel XCP-ng Center Team
                                    last edited by

                                    Maybe we can create a new SR type "zfs" and copy the file SR implementation from https://github.com/xapi-project/sm/blob/master/drivers/FileSR.py
                                    This would us later allow to create a more deeper integration of ZFS.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • borzelB Offline
                                      borzel XCP-ng Center Team
                                      last edited by borzel

                                      Success! I changed in /opt/xensource/sm/blktap2.py

                                       elif not ((self.target.vdi.sr.handles("nfs") or self.target.vdi.sr.handles("ext") or self.target.vdi.sr.handles("smb"))):
                                      

                                      to

                                       elif not ((self.target.vdi.sr.handles("file")) or (self.target.vdi.sr.handles("nfs") or self.target.vdi.sr.handles("ext") or self.target.vdi.sr.handles("smb"))):
                                      

                                      Than I deleted /opt/xensource/sm/blktap2.pyc and /opt/xensource/sm/blktap2.pyo so that the *.py file is used.

                                      Now I can copy from other SR types to my ZFS SR.

                                      But copy within my ZFS SR does not work...

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • borzelB Offline
                                        borzel XCP-ng Center Team
                                        last edited by

                                        some info about the o_direct flag: https://xenserver.org/blog/entry/read-caching.html

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • borzelB Offline
                                          borzel XCP-ng Center Team
                                          last edited by borzel

                                          After reading some, I think we can not get it fully working in short time. Some of the tools might not work without o_direct support:

                                          If the underlying file-system does not support O_DIRECT, utilities (e.g, vhd-util) may fail with error code 22 (EINVAL). Similarly, Xen may fail with a message as follows:
                                          TapdiskException: ('create', '-avhd:/home/cklein/vms/vm-rubis-0/root.vhd') failed (5632 )

                                          https://github.com/xapi-project/blktap/blob/master/README


                                          Today there is just one fully working local ZFS configuration:

                                          • create your ZFS-Pool: zpool create ...
                                          • create a ZVOL (aka blockdevice): zfs create -V 50G pool/my_local_sr
                                          • create an EXT3 based SR: xe sr-create host-uuid=<UUID_of_your_host> type=ext shared=false name-label=<Name_of_my_SR> device-config:device=/dev/zvol/<pool-name>/<zvol-name>

                                          It's not optimal, but working.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • nraynaudN Offline
                                            nraynaud XCP-ng Team
                                            last edited by

                                            I am working on the issue right now. I am trying to exactly nail the problem.
                                            there are 2 cases:

                                            • xe vdi-copy from another SR to a ZFS SR doesn't work
                                            • xe vdi-copy on the same SR doesn't work.

                                            I that a complete assessment of the issues you found?

                                            A cursory test seems to show that ssh ${XCP_HOST_UNDER_TEST} sed -i.bak 's/# unbuffered = true/unbuffered = false/' /etc/sparse_dd.conf solves the issue of intra-ZFS copies, but I am still confirming that I have not done anything else on my test box.

                                            Thanks,
                                            Nicolas.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                            Register Login
                                            • First post
                                              Last post