XCP-ng Center: Future

[MajorTom]

@borzel, many many thanks for work on XCP-ng Center!
Without XCP-ng Center, administering XCP-ng would be much more difficult and risky (error-prone) for me.

[gskger]

@borzel: I second that! From time to time, I try to move over to XOA, but I always keep coming back to XCP-ng Center. XCP-ng Center supports my administrative tasks in a straight forward way (at least apart from backups ) and gives me all the information I need. Thank's for doing a great job!

[onur]

Thank you very much borzel. I am daily using XCP-ng Center to manage VM of 3 servers. I use XO for backup and migrate cases. Both are great tools. Thanks again for your time for providing and keep updating the release.

[borzel]

and here is the next nightly build

https://github.com/xcp-ng/xenadmin/releases/tag/99.99.99.28

Contains:

• all upstream changes from https://github.com/xenserver/xenadmin master
• 

[stevewest15]

@borzel Thank you for all your work. XCP-ng Center is a tool I use most while XO is great for doing backups.

[markhewitt1978]

@gskger said in XCP-ng Center: Future:

@borzel: I second that! From time to time, I try to move over to XOA, but I always keep coming back to XCP-ng Center. XCP-ng Center supports my administrative tasks in a straight forward way (at least apart from backups ) and gives me all the information I need. Thank's for doing a great job!

Same here. XO is good but doesn't give you the same sort of overview that you get from xcp-ng center. Everything is somewhat hidden away under its on set of sub menus.

[A Former User]

Will XCP-NG Center ever support IPv6?

[borzel]

@Appollonius I don't think so, unless it's implemented upstream.

[A Former User]

@borzel Sad, as it will be today's 'standard' and will apply even more the upcoming years.

[jtbw911]

@Appollonius @borzel They've been saying that it'll be relevant for 20 years, though.

[Lentz]

This post is deleted!