XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    FYI - Applying 11/3/2022 and 11/4/2022 Commits in XO from Sources

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    22 Posts 9 Posters 4.7k Views 7 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • I Offline
      iLix @Danp
      last edited by

      @Danp OK, good to know. I just set it to 4GB and never looked backπŸ™‚

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • gskgerG Offline
        gskger Top contributor @Danp
        last edited by

        @Danp Same here. Have been running XO from script with 4GB since I ran into problems I think a year ago. No problems since than πŸ˜ƒ

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DanpD Offline
          Danp Pro Support Team
          last edited by

          FWIW, today I'm having trouble building with 4GB --

          [08:34:41] Starting 'copyAssets'...
          transforming (10) ../../node_modules/@vue/runtime-dom/dist/runtime-dom.esm-bundler.jsKilled
          error Command failed with exit code 137.
          info Visit https://yarnpkg.com/en/docs/cli/run for documentation about this command.
          ERROR: "type-check" exited with 137.
          * @xen-orchestra/lite:build βˆ’ Error: 1
          <snip>
          [08:37:56] Finished 'copyAssets' after 3.23 min
          [08:39:37] Finished 'buildScripts' after 4.92 min
          [08:39:37] Finished 'build' after 4.92 min
          βœ– 1
          error Command failed with exit code 1.
          
          JamfoFLJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JamfoFLJ Offline
            JamfoFL @Danp
            last edited by

            I kept my VM at 4 GB after making the report the other day and haven't had any issues since. I even updated again this morning (after I noticed the large number of commits from yesterday and this morning) and everything ran just fine. The only thing out of the ordinary I noticed was I am still getting the "chunk" error message during the process.

            (!) Some chunks are larger than 500 KiB after minification. Consider:
            - Using dynamic import() to code-split the application
            - Use build.rollupOptions.output.manualChunks to improve chunking: https://rollupjs.org/guide/en/#outputmanualchunks
            - Adjust chunk size limit for this warning via build.chunkSizeWarningLimit.
            

            That hasn't caused any issues, as far as I see. Everything appears to be working as it should!

            H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • H Offline
              hoerup @JamfoFL
              last edited by

              When I (re)build on my 3 GB vm i use this before in order to keep nodejs at bay

              export NODE_OPTIONS='--max-old-space-size=3072'
              

              And then it runs smoothly

              DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • DanpD Offline
                Danp Pro Support Team @hoerup
                last edited by

                @hoerup Unfortunately, that doesn't help in my situation. I recently upgraded the VM to Ubuntu 22.10, so maybe that is contribution to the problem.

                JamfoFLJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • JamfoFLJ Offline
                  JamfoFL @Danp
                  last edited by

                  @Danp I'm using Debian Bullseye... I am able to run the updates now, but still see that same "chunk size" error notice you initially reported. Still, it seems you have it even worse...

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • ronivayR Offline
                    ronivay Top contributor
                    last edited by ronivay

                    I'm running daily installation from sources on multiple different OS's. All have the same specs: 2vCPU/4GB RAM. This has worked flawlessly for a long time. Recently (starting from 4th/5th Nov) i've started to see OOM errors almost daily during yarn build which then cause it to fail with following error:

                    Using polyfills: No polyfills were added, since the `useBuiltIns` option was not set.
                    [01:23:25] Finished 'copyAssets' after 36 s
                    [01:24:33] Finished 'buildScripts' after 1.73 min
                    [01:24:33] Finished 'build' after 1.73 min
                    βœ– 1
                    error Command failed with exit code 1.
                    

                    It isn't consistent, sometimes it's debian that fails, sometimes ubuntu, sometimes centos/almalinux and so on. Something has definitely changed in the build procedure that eats more RAM than it used to.

                    I’m fine with increasing the RAM if needed. Just wanted to point this out if there’s something out of the ordinary with latest changes.

                    DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • DanpD Offline
                      Danp Pro Support Team @ronivay
                      last edited by

                      @ronivay said in FYI - Applying 11/3/2022 and 11/4/2022 Commits in XO from Sources:

                      Something has definitely changed in the build procedure that eats more RAM than it used to.

                      Agreed. Maybe @julien-f can add some insight into what has changed and how to successfully build from sources.

                      julien-fJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • julien-fJ Offline
                        julien-f Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder XO Team @Danp
                        last edited by

                        I believe this was due to the inclusion of XO Lite on the master branch.

                        I've limited the number of packages built concurrently: https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/commit/08298d3284119ad855552af36a810a3a9a006759

                        Tell me if that helps πŸ™‚

                        0 julien-f committed to vatesfr/xen-orchestra
                        feat: limit concurrency of root build script
                        
                        Should fixes https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/54567
                        JamfoFLJ ronivayR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • JamfoFLJ Offline
                          JamfoFL @julien-f
                          last edited by

                          @julien-f I just ran a "yard build" this morning, and other than still seeing the chunk error message:

                          (!) Some chunks are larger than 500 KiB after minification. Consider:
                          - Using dynamic import() to code-split the application
                          - Use build.rollupOptions.output.manualChunks to improve chunking: https://rollupjs.org/guide/en/#outputmanualchunks
                          - Adjust chunk size limit for this warning via build.chunkSizeWarningLimit.
                          

                          Everything else ran fine... no errors or OOM issues.

                          julien-fJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • julien-fJ Offline
                            julien-f Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder XO Team @JamfoFL
                            last edited by

                            @JamfoFL Great!

                            Yes, the warning is unrelated (ping @pdonias).

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • ronivayR Offline
                              ronivay Top contributor @julien-f
                              last edited by

                              @julien-f haven't seen OOM's after this so looks good, thank you.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                              • E Offline
                                EliSmith
                                last edited by

                                Thanks for sharing πŸ™‚

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post