XO Team

Hi @RaHu! No, at the moment, we don't synchronize hosts' information. I'm not even sure where that information could go as there isn't such a thing as a host object in Netbox, AFAIK.

@olivierlambert No, because {name} will be replaced by the main name input (at the top of the form), not the individual names in case of bulk creation. So you should get "test1", "test2", as expected.

Thank you all, this is now fixed.

https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/commit/07bd9cadd4732554c57e441cd9d860b63f73fe02

0 julien-f committed to vatesfr/xen-orchestra

fix(xo-server/vm.create): typo during VIF creation

Introduced by ecae554a7

Fixes https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/49143

Hi @Andrew the backup listed in restore (and health check) should be complete. We create an alias to the real vhd directory and this alias is created only after the transfer is finished.

We are reworking the logs to be more precise and visible in the UI, because some of these are not needed anymore (and some are really hard to understand (like the unused message that can be reached by two code paths)

maybe it's more a restore heath check issue. Do you have more details?

@ronivay hi, can you test this branch fix_console_bis before we merge it?

thank you for your report

@ronivay hi , something should not have worked as intended, I'm working on it. Your server is a 7.6 ?

The DNS cache has been merged, keep us posted if you have any issues.

@hoerup I agree with your analysis, not sure how easy it will be to fix, we'll investigate.

Hello,

I have investigated a bit, and indeed Node does not cache DNS queries and calls system methods directly (e.g. gethostbyname).

I've created a test branch which improves the situation: https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/6196

But I'm wondering if it's the right approach, maybe it this responsibility should be left to the system and we should nscd to our XOAs.

Let me know if you have any opinions on this or feedbacks on my branch.

julien-f created this issue in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

closed feat(@vates/cached-dns.lookup): small DNS cache #6196

@bberndt are you able to test the fix ?